The counsel has experience in prosecuting Federal and state class actions throughout the U.S.

Plaintiffs and Class members all own code published under a License.

The Defendants’ agents operated under the explicit and apparent authority of their principals.

OpenAI, GitHub, and Microsoft are the stated defendants in the 'Doe v. Github' lawsuit.

GitHub and all the OpenAI entities are headquartered within the San Francisco Division of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Plaintiffs’ fraud claim alleges merely that GitHub stated that it would not sell or distribute Plaintiffs’ code, then “failed to honor [these] representations”.

Plaintiffs duplicate their DMCA, tort, passing off, and privacy claims as purported violations by GitHub of California’s Unfair Competition Law.

Plaintiffs purport to advance an unjust enrichment claim against GitHub (Count VI), but “there is no cause of action in California for unjust enrichment.”

As Plaintiffs acknowledge, Copilot’s suggestions are not copied from any particular source, but generated based on patterns it has “seen the most."

The TOS informs users that “You own content you create, but you allow us certain rights to it.”