Numerous questions of law or fact common to the entire Class arise from Defendants’ conduct.

Plaintiffs and Class members all own code published under a License.

Plaintiffs bring this action for damages and injunctive relief on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated.

The Defendants’ agents operated under the explicit and apparent authority of their principals.

OpenAI, GitHub, and Microsoft are the stated defendants in the 'Doe v. Github' lawsuit.

GitHub and all the OpenAI entities are headquartered within the San Francisco Division of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Plaintiffs seek to recover injunctive relief and damages as a result and consequence of Defendants’ unlawful conduct.

Contrary to and in violation of the Licenses, code reproduced by Copilot never includes attributions to the underlying authors.

Future AI products may represent a bold and innovative step forward. GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex, however, do not.

Plaintiffs purport to advance an unjust enrichment claim against GitHub (Count VI), but “there is no cause of action in California for unjust enrichment.”

Although Plaintiffs label their claim one for tortious interference with contract, they identify no contractual relationship between themselves and anyone else.