Plus to justify to Russian villeins the growth of military expenditures.

This kind of news is an argument for why Russia spends hundreds of billions on the army and the military-industrial complex, a la - we're not just throwing money in the hole - we have milk production records here!

And don't give a fuck that the money is not actually spent on real modernisation, but on eating, sabotage and sawing (which is not bad for Ukrainians, by the way).

Plus for imitation of stability for internal and external consumers.

For internal audience - it is an indicator that the country is holding up, industry is working, the fleet is being built.

For the external audience - Russia is coping with sanctions, everything is going according to plan.

Everything is like in the USSR - stable stability, no one checks reports, and the media will not say anything unnecessary.

Moral. The text about milk yields in Russia is so bad, citizens of the Chekists. Try it again

The end

P.s - Want to help Ukraine's counter-propaganda? - 4441111068433840

PayPal- fashdonetsk2022@gmail.com

Patreon- https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk

Btc
bc1qdtrkvnqhur6zvftku73stq88y97ut4rg730kdq

Это пропаганда в чистом виде — для отвлечения внимания от реального состояния дел. Чтобы русский скот думал, типа всё не так уж и плохо - деньги идут, предприятия работают

Плюс шоб замылить реальную картину провалов в ОПК, который постоянно в эпицентре коррупции, просрочек и проваленных контрактов.

Но публиковать это напрямую нельзя (на Колыму уехать за такое можно). Поэтому вброс делается через успешный успех, но без цифр по убыточности.

По факту же все выглядит так, будто отрасль растёт, а реальный смысл размывается.

Плюс шоб обосновать русским холопам рост военных расходов

Новости подобного рода — это аргументация того, почему россия тратит сотни миллиардов на армию и ВПК, а-ля - мы ж не просто кидаем деньги в яму — у нас тут рекорды надоев!

И похуй шо на самом деле деньги идут не на реальную модернизацию, а на проедание, саботаж и распилы (что для украинцев совсем неплохо, кстати)

Плюс для имитации стабильности для внутреннего и внешнего потребителя

Для внутренней аудитории - это показатель того шо страна держится, промышленность работает, флот строится

Для внешней - россия справляется с санкциями, у нас всё идёт по плану

Все как при ссср- стабильная стабильность, отчёты никто не проверяет, а в СМИ лишнего не скажут

Мораль. Текст про надои в россии так себе, граждане чекисты. Спробуйте ще

Конец

P.s - Хочешь помочь контрпропаганде Украины?- 4441111068433840

PayPal- fashdonetsk2022@gmail.com

Патреон- https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk

ВТС
bc1qdtrkvnqhur6zvftku73stq88y97ut4rg730kdq

🏔️🇺🇦128-ма окрема гірсько-штурмова бригада запрошує до своїх лав:

- Операторів/майстрів БПЛА,
- Навідників танків та інших бойових машин,
- Командирів відділень (піхотних),
- Бойових медиків,
- Механіків-водіїв / водіїв.

Чому обирають нас:
- забезпечуємо необхідним обладнанням та амуніцією,
- досвідчені командири, які знають ціну життя.

Якщо ви готові захищати свій дім та рідних разом з нами, звертайтеся за детальною інформацією:
📞 050 665 67 00, або на сайті https://bit.ly/42IMhD0
💪Ставай частиною легендарної бригади, приєднуйся до 128-ї ОГШБр!

Це ше шо за хуйня?

Ояєбу

Ой, все)

До речі, канал на Патреон можна підтримати тут https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk

Сукаблдйбнпздцнхй

The Caribbean crisis of every day or the battle for the Arctic has begun.

The government of the Russian Federation has denounced agreements with Norway, Sweden and Finland on cooperation in the Barents/Euro-Arctic region. This means that Russia has officially withdrawn from a number of international treaties governing cooperation in this region.

A number of agreements were denounced, including

Agreement on the Establishment of the International Barents Secretariat (signed in 2007) - a structure that coordinates cooperation between the countries of the region.

The 2008 Agreement on Cooperation in Disaster Prevention, Preparedness and Response among the Member States of the Barents/Euro-Arctic Council (BER).

The denunciation order was signed by Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin on 16 April 2025. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs was instructed to notify the partners and stop paying membership fees to the Barents Secretariat budget.

After the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine in 2022, the Nordic countries - Norway, Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Iceland - suspended cooperation with Russia within the framework of the CBSS. In response, Russia officially withdrew from the Council in September 2023, accusing its Western partners of "politicising and paralysing the work" of the organisation.

In practice, this means a complete breakdown of institutional cooperation between Russia and the Nordic countries in the Arctic + the termination of joint projects in the fields of ecology, transport, economy, and emergency response + increased political isolation of Russia in the Arctic region.

Thus, Russia is finally withdrawing from the cooperation formats created in the 1990s for the development of the Arctic and border regions.

In fact, the denunciation of the agreements with Norway, Finland and Sweden is an alarming signal, as Moscow is turning the North into a springboard for a new confrontation.

Now the Kremlin is not bound by any norms of cooperation - not in emergencies, not in environmental issues, not in conflict prevention.

In military terms, this means freedom of action to escalate relations with NATO. Let me explain why

Previously, there was a treaty practice of warning of military exercises, limited deployment of troops near borders, and joint monitoring. Now, after the cancellation of the agreements, Moscow has the opportunity to deploy additional forces on the Kola Peninsula, expand military infrastructure in the Arkhangelsk region, Karelia and the Arctic Ocean islands, create fortified strongholds with radar, observation posts, hangars for fighter jets and air defence, and build dual-purpose airfields in the Tiksi - Anadyr - Severomorsk area.

Russia can use the Northern Fleet, which is the main tool for controlling the Barents and Norwegian Seas, without restrictions. We are talking about nuclear submarines with "Bulava" (ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads). Destroyers and frigates capable of operating in close proximity to the Norwegian coast will carry scanners and other peaceful shit on their platforms. Right in the vicinity of NATO countries

In addition, the rejection of the agreements allows Russia to move naval groups covertly, without warning notifications, imitating manoeuvres

Also, Russia can use submarines to reconnoiter NATO routes, in particular in the GIUK-gap (Greenland-Iceland-Scotland) + conduct operations to sabotage communication cables and sensors, as it did in the Baltic and North Seas (2022-2024) (installation of underwater sensors and beacons allows tracking the movements of Western ships and potentially attacking infrastructure in the future)

I'm not sure, but I think that Russia will create an air defence belt to block NATO's northern routes with S-400, S-500, Pantsir-SM, and install long-range radar for hundreds of kilometres.
👇

After that, an ongoing Cuban Missile Crisis 2.0 will begin - Russian missiles will be deployed as close to the border with Norway and Finland as possible, which ultimately gives a simple and clear result - any NATO aircraft over the Barents Sea will be hit.

Or in simple terms, Russia will stupidly create no-fly zones for Western aviation. And that's it.

Next. The Northern Sea Route (NSR), a former logistics project, will be turned into a military-controlled route by the Russians. As a result of such actions, Russia can accompany civilian ships with military convoys (optional) + establish prohibited zones for foreign ships, justifying it with conditional military exercises

But that's not all. Next, dual-purpose icebreakers, including nuclear-powered icebreakers, are being used to provide logistics for naval operations in the Eastern Arctic. In practice, this means that under the guise of protection, Russia will deploy ships and submarines to strategic positions near the Bering Strait and Northern Canada (!!!)

Once again, after the denunciation of the agreements, Russia is not obliged to explain anything to anyone. Therefore, the Caribbean crisis 2.0 will begin

First of all, there will be provocations near the Norwegian or Finnish maritime borders. After the water, Russia will take to the skies and start violating the airspace of NATO members "by mistake"

There will definitely be an exercise involving nuclear carriers, without notice and against the backdrop of normal logistics - to scare the "Eurofascists" as much as possible.

I forgot - Norway, Sweden and Finland, get ready to shoot down reconnaissance drones in the neutral zone, which the Russians will call ordinary "weather observation" tools.

In fact, NATO is getting a new "northern front" with a constant threat of a nuclear strike

Therefore, NATO should take care of increasing the US presence in Norway, deploying air defence and HIMARS, Atacams in Finland, and try to turn Svalbard (where the Russians are already present) and Iceland into an air defence and radar base.

There is even a bonus - now NATO needs constant exercises in the Arctic (Nordic Response, Arctic Forge, Cold Response).

Europe faces a threat to maritime communication cables and gas pipelines, a blow to the logistics of liquefied natural gas supplies through the Barents Sea, and the risk of damage to critical infrastructure in Scandinavia, including power plants, shipyards, and the satellite network. Russia openly puts military priority above international obligations.

Denunciation of agreements is an act of not only legal but also strategic importance. Russia.

Official Moscow has sent a clear message: in northern Eurasia, as in eastern Europe, there is now only the right to rule by force, military threat and unilateral control.

The era of "Arctic stability" is over. The Arctic is no longer a white spot in the world, but a new frontline.

Next. From the point of view of semantic warfare, Russia's denunciation of the agreements with Norway, Sweden and Finland is a well-defined message. The semantic dimension of this step is no less important than the military one. This is how it works:

Russia is abandoning the language of cooperation and returning to the language of force. Words like "partnership," "cooperation," "coordination," "dialogue," and "joint response" have been the basis of Arctic diplomacy since the 1990s.

Now they are being replaced by "unilateral decision" and "response to Western aggression",
"liberation from illusions", and "protection of national interests in the Arctic".

Please note how the context has changed: from the concept of "the North as a zone of common good" to "the North as an arena of competition and control". Moscow no longer wants to speak the language of international law - only the language of power.

The phrase "politicisation of the Council" is a pure substitution of concepts. When Moscow claims that the Barents Council "no longer exists" because of its "politicisation", it is a semantic manipulation

👇👇

In reality, "politicisation" is the West's reaction to Russia's aggression.

In the rhetoric of Russia, it is a pretext to present its isolation as a voluntary separation from the allegedly "morally degraded West".

Thus, the outcast is not the one who violates the norms, but the one who "dared to demand their observance".

Further. Until 2022, the Arctic was presented in Russian propaganda as a "zone of cooperation", "an example of successful multipolarity", "a region of trust despite sanctions".

But that was before. Now it is "our resource shield", "our northern bastion", "the key to Russia's sovereignty".

There is a change in the semantic framework (the frame of perception, the angle of interpretation) from "common future" to "existential struggle" (the battle for existence)

Now the North is a new "sacred" territory for Russia

In the official rhetoric of Russian propaganda, the following theses are increasingly heard: "the Arctic is ours", "no one has the right to dictate to Russia how to defend its shores"; "we will not allow a repeat of the NATO scenario near our northern borders".

The Arctic is already turning into a "sacred" Crimea or Donbas in Russian propaganda. The region is declared a symbol of strength, sacrifice and national revival.

In the terms of semantic warfare, this is the sacralisation of space - and the sacred is known to be "non-negotiable".

In addition, Moscow is also building a narrative in style: "We wanted to cooperate. But they betrayed us. They brought war to a place where there was peace. Now it's too late".

This is a technique of projective accusation (inverse propaganda), when one's own aggression is presented as a response to the "betrayal of partners".

But for the Kremlin, this is only a convenient tool, because it is used to demoralise Europeans (the effect of the point of no return, giving up hope for dialogue) and to mobilise Russians (we are not weak - we were the first to leave).

Russia will use the denunciation of the treaty in its media campaigns in the South and East, in the context of "Russia is getting out of Western control even in the Arctic - this is what a strong civilisation does", "Europe is losing control of the North, and Russia is regaining it".

Watch out for the hands, or rather how the Russians' breaking of the treaty turns into an imperial narrative:

"We are regaining control of history and space. Even in the Arctic".

And lastly, or to understand that Russian actions cannot be interpreted according to generally accepted rules. In the traditional logic of international relations, isolation is a sign of weakness.

👇👇👇