До речі, канал на Патреон можна підтримати тут https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk
💯701👍131👏38🤮14🔥12🖕9❤4⚡4😁2🤡2
"Гордым приднестровцам" разработали методичку о том, как экономить электроэнергию(фото 1).
На остальных скринах - реакция ваты из "пымыры" на отключение газа.
P.S. Оказывается, биндеры виноваты в том, что пымыры осталось без газа: они надоумили Санду, что платить рф за газ не нужно(скрин 10).
Контент від підписника
На остальных скринах - реакция ваты из "пымыры" на отключение газа.
P.S. Оказывается, биндеры виноваты в том, что пымыры осталось без газа: они надоумили Санду, что платить рф за газ не нужно(скрин 10).
Контент від підписника
😁873🤣407👍56💩36🤡16👻11❤6🤷♂5🔥5😈2🥰1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Це вам за те шо до церкви не ходите
🤮1.18K😁249💩152🤣141👻11👍8😱6🍓5🖕5❤4🎃2
Forwarded from Petrenko AndryiⒸ (Kyiv Ukraine)
Мішок для путіна, в подарунок мотузок...
🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻
ПІДТРИМАЙТЕ ПО 7 ГРН:
Важливий #ЗБІР пілотам дронів з 5 ОШБ Київської області на зброю!
- PayPal: petrenkoandryi@gmail.com
- Monobank: send.monobank.ua/jar/5UWtYEFB1V
- PrivatBank: privat24.ua/send/d0nml
🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻
За донат 500 грн — отримайте кружку від автора:
@PetrenkoAndryi
🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻
ПІДТРИМАЙТЕ ПО 7 ГРН:
Важливий #ЗБІР пілотам дронів з 5 ОШБ Київської області на зброю!
- PayPal: petrenkoandryi@gmail.com
- Monobank: send.monobank.ua/jar/5UWtYEFB1V
- PrivatBank: privat24.ua/send/d0nml
🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻
За донат 500 грн — отримайте кружку від автора:
@PetrenkoAndryi
👍567❤57🙏26💯14🤪6🔥4🖕1
Goebbelsyatina in rf on their knees
I love it when russians try to play mummy's manipulators. And now I'm going to prove it. On pebbles.
In the given statement of boyarin of all Russia (deputy minister) there is a stupid pack of manipulative receptions which influence perception of the information by audience.
For example, such a concept is used as a false dichotomy (false dilemma). The statement offers only two options for solving the problem:
either increasing tariffs by 2-3 times or reducing electricity consumption.
In reality, there may be other options - optimisation of energy sector management, reduction of corruption, attraction of more efficient investors or introduction of energy efficient technologies. But the Russian people are being offered two "alternative" scenarios, both of which are negative
Therefore, the peasant will be happy to "choose" the lesser evil and drown against those who ask a lot of "unnecessary" questions.
What follows is pure Orwellian or shifting responsibility to the consumer. The responsibility for the financial sustainability of the energy industry is placed on the villeins: either they pay more or reduce their consumption. Issues of management efficiency, corruption in the industry, public investment and subsidies are left out of the picture - fuck it, it's all gay.
Then the Goebbelsyatin continues and the katsap uses such a manipulative technique as appeal to inevitability. The wording "In order for investments to pay off, we will have to..." gives the impression that there are no other solutions and cannot be. Well, and the fact that the return on investment depends on many factors (project efficiency, transparency of procurement, technology, level of state subsidies, etc.), the peasants do not need to be told (they won't fucking understand). Therefore, everything is presented as an "inevitable" reality.
And I am not talking about the fact that the text has an emotional context. The use of the phrase "the era of cheap electricity is over" appeals to emotional perception, deliberately evoking a sense of loss and anxiety among citizens. Such wording generalises the situation and creates a feeling of catastrophic, without giving specific data and reasons why it happened and who is to blame (well, not the boyars, right - it happened somehow).
Manipulation with a lack of specifics and figures. The statement stupidly lacks data on the volume of investments, the current state of the power industry and the real reasons for the need to raise tariffs. Because it is easy to calculate the figures and double-check their reliability. That's why everything is done without figures - it allows to create any convenient explanation, leaving the audience without the opportunity for critical analysis.
The bottom line is that the grabchka statement uses:
false choice (illusion of choice);
appeal to inevitability;
shifting responsibility to the consumer;
an emotional message to justify potential tariff increases or reductions in electricity consumption;
plus deliberately does not provide any arguments that can be verified (the boss said = so it's true);
plus no one is named as the guilty party - it all worked out that way somehow, yeah;
Epilogue or why so many letters. In order to clearly understand that typical manipulative rhetoric is used to prepare the Russian people for unpopular measures and to minimise criticism of the boyars (authorities and managers of the rf industry):
the decision has already been made, the villeins will not decide anything and I cannot participate in making such decisions (it is not in the order of mortals to get involved in matters of national importance
Hello to mum's manipulators from rf. Practise in front of a mirror first
End
P.s - Want to help Ukraine's counter-propaganda? - 4441111068433840
PayPal- fashdonetsk2022@gmail.com
Patreon- https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk
Втс:
bc1qdtrkvnqhur6zvftku73stq88y97ut4rg730kdq
I love it when russians try to play mummy's manipulators. And now I'm going to prove it. On pebbles.
In the given statement of boyarin of all Russia (deputy minister) there is a stupid pack of manipulative receptions which influence perception of the information by audience.
For example, such a concept is used as a false dichotomy (false dilemma). The statement offers only two options for solving the problem:
either increasing tariffs by 2-3 times or reducing electricity consumption.
In reality, there may be other options - optimisation of energy sector management, reduction of corruption, attraction of more efficient investors or introduction of energy efficient technologies. But the Russian people are being offered two "alternative" scenarios, both of which are negative
Therefore, the peasant will be happy to "choose" the lesser evil and drown against those who ask a lot of "unnecessary" questions.
What follows is pure Orwellian or shifting responsibility to the consumer. The responsibility for the financial sustainability of the energy industry is placed on the villeins: either they pay more or reduce their consumption. Issues of management efficiency, corruption in the industry, public investment and subsidies are left out of the picture - fuck it, it's all gay.
Then the Goebbelsyatin continues and the katsap uses such a manipulative technique as appeal to inevitability. The wording "In order for investments to pay off, we will have to..." gives the impression that there are no other solutions and cannot be. Well, and the fact that the return on investment depends on many factors (project efficiency, transparency of procurement, technology, level of state subsidies, etc.), the peasants do not need to be told (they won't fucking understand). Therefore, everything is presented as an "inevitable" reality.
And I am not talking about the fact that the text has an emotional context. The use of the phrase "the era of cheap electricity is over" appeals to emotional perception, deliberately evoking a sense of loss and anxiety among citizens. Such wording generalises the situation and creates a feeling of catastrophic, without giving specific data and reasons why it happened and who is to blame (well, not the boyars, right - it happened somehow).
Manipulation with a lack of specifics and figures. The statement stupidly lacks data on the volume of investments, the current state of the power industry and the real reasons for the need to raise tariffs. Because it is easy to calculate the figures and double-check their reliability. That's why everything is done without figures - it allows to create any convenient explanation, leaving the audience without the opportunity for critical analysis.
The bottom line is that the grabchka statement uses:
false choice (illusion of choice);
appeal to inevitability;
shifting responsibility to the consumer;
an emotional message to justify potential tariff increases or reductions in electricity consumption;
plus deliberately does not provide any arguments that can be verified (the boss said = so it's true);
plus no one is named as the guilty party - it all worked out that way somehow, yeah;
Epilogue or why so many letters. In order to clearly understand that typical manipulative rhetoric is used to prepare the Russian people for unpopular measures and to minimise criticism of the boyars (authorities and managers of the rf industry):
the decision has already been made, the villeins will not decide anything and I cannot participate in making such decisions (it is not in the order of mortals to get involved in matters of national importance
Hello to mum's manipulators from rf. Practise in front of a mirror first
End
P.s - Want to help Ukraine's counter-propaganda? - 4441111068433840
PayPal- fashdonetsk2022@gmail.com
Patreon- https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk
Втс:
bc1qdtrkvnqhur6zvftku73stq88y97ut4rg730kdq
👍182👏25💯4👎1