DNAmeter
2.88K subscribers
1.79K photos
189 videos
63 files
599 links
Channel for posting dna,culture and other stuff.
Any queries contact:- @Messagehere333
Download Telegram
DNAmeter
So some Mediterraneans also visited subcontinent @illyrianometer https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-11357-9
QpAdm dna breakdown of med sample from India_RoopkundB_oNearEast

In roopkund B site of india possible Mediterranean samples were found
One outlier is close to greeks with
47.6% Anatolian Neolithic farmer
19% iran Neolithic farmer
15.8% proto indo european
9.7% Caucasus hunter gatherer
7.9% israel natufian

This sample is genetically close to greek central anatolia

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘5
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ Unveiling the Iraqi Tapestry: A Journey Through Ancestry ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ

๐Ÿงฌ G25 DNA Breakdown:

โ€ข 45.4% Iran Chalcolithic ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท
โ€ข 39.4% Levantine ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
โ€ข 11.8% Proto-Indo-European ๐ŸŒพ
โ€ข 3.4% East African (Probably Cushitic) ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡น

๐Ÿค Genetic Connections:

โ€ข Other Iraqi Arabs ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ
โ€ข Syrians ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡พ
@illyrianometer
๐Ÿฅฐ10
Fst analysis of northern Caucasus,saudi and Norwegian
Previously we discussed about armenians
They are related to southern Caucasus and they had more Levantine

Fst between chechen and Norwegian is 0.0140
Fst between Norwegian and saudi is 0.0273

Overall chechens are closer to Norwegians than arabs

@illyrianometer
โค2
the second model acknowledges the presence of South Asian ancestry in some Bronze Age BMAC samples and suggests Tajiks and Yaghnobis could have derived from distinct BMAC populations, respectively with and without South Asian ancestry, who have both experienced independent admixture with Andronovo-like steppe populations during Iron Age
@illyrianometer
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-04144-4
Female bust, Sassanian,
3rd-7th century CE.
@illyrianometer
DNAmeter
Female bust, Sassanian, 3rd-7th century CE. @illyrianometer
My imagination on Female bust, Sassanian,
3rd-7th century CE.
@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘5
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Unveiling the Turkish Tapestry: A Journey Through Ancestry ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท

๐Ÿงฌ QpAdm DNA Breakdown:

โ€ข 35.9% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŒพ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท
โ€ข 16.9% Iran Neolithic Farmer ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŒพ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท
โ€ข 16.3% Proto-Indo-European ๐ŸŒพ
โ€ข 14.2% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer ๐Ÿน๐Ÿ”๏ธ
โ€ข 10% Proto-Turk ๐Ÿบ
โ€ข 4.5% Israel_Natufian ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
โ€ข 3% Western Hunter-Gatherer ๐Ÿน

๐Ÿค Genetic Connections:

โ€ข Turks residing in Turkey ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท

๐Ÿงฌ Simulated Turkish Sample:

โ€ข Close to Turks of Denizli ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘8โค1
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Unveiling the Belarusian Tapestry: A Journey Through Ancestry ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ

๐Ÿงฌ QpAdm DNA Breakdown:

โ€ข 32.2% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŒพ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท
โ€ข 49.7% Proto-Indo-European ๐ŸŒพ
โ€ข 15.5% Western Hunter-Gatherer ๐Ÿน
โ€ข 2.7% Uralic ๐Ÿ”๏ธ

๐Ÿค Genetic Connections:

โ€ข Russians residing in Smolensk ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘5โค3
Balto-Slavic drift doesn't make sense
In genetic community mostly people use Balto-Slavic drift to do dna breakdown of slavic people but it doesn't make sense

It is a G25 issue
qpAdm dna tool tells baltic hunter gatherer isn't scored by slavs at all

Balto-Slavic drift is debunked

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘10
I want you all to have attention on picture c
I have simplified it:-

(c) Early Eurasians (like Ustโ€™Ishim and Tianyuan) and Eastern non-Africans (like Onge and Papuans) share more alleles with European hunter-gatherers than with Dzudzuana.


This is happening because ancient northern eurasian most likely had an archaic ancestry related to basal east eurasians
@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘3
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Japanese immigrants in Brazil ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต over 2 milion, 2024
@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ˜3
Exploring real turanic heritage of modern Turks
Many people say Turanism is ideology or philosophy but let us think genetically
We all know native Anatolians were not turanics but related to anatolia
Turanians were basically related to central asian avestan people
Most people confuse avestan with modern iranians
Please don't do this modern iranians have extra Levantine and iran chalcolithic
Turanians on other hand were central asians and they are mentioned in avesta a lot of times

So if you look Turanian=avestan +proto turkic east eurasian sample

From the 5th century CE, the Sasanian Empire defined "Turan" in opposition to "Iran", as the land where lay its enemies to the northeast

Later turanians were clearly considered enemies of Iran by west Iranians

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘12
Admixture among bulgarians with qpadm
53% Slavic
47% Thracian Roman Era (Mixed with anatolians)
@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘6
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฑ First time i got chance to deal with mixed chilean dna sample
Quiet interesting
Thank you Felipe for help
He is:-

๐Ÿงฌ 58% European & 42% Non-European

๐Ÿงฌ 12.6% Steppe ๐ŸŽ
35.4% Indigenous American
๐Ÿน 38.6% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŒพ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท
6.8% Western Hunter-Gatherer ๐Ÿน
3.6% Proto-Maghrebi ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ
3% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer ๐Ÿ”๏ธ

๐ŸŒŽ Almost Unrelated to any modern populations

๐ŸŒ Distant Relative of Central Asians

@illyrianometer
โค8๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿ”ฅ2
Dna results of a turk from turkey
70.2% anatolian
18.8% turkic
6.4% pontic
2.8% european
1.8% african
@illyrianometer
โค6๐Ÿ‘1
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Unveiling the Azerbaijani Tapestry: A Journey Through Ancestry ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ

๐Ÿงฌ QpAdm DNA Breakdown:

โ€ข 28.2% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŒพ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท
โ€ข 24.5% Proto-Indo-European ๐ŸŒพ
โ€ข 21.1% Iran Neolithic Farmer ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŒพ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท
โ€ข 12.2% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer ๐Ÿน๐Ÿ”๏ธ
โ€ข 6.9% Proto-Turkic ๐Ÿบ
โ€ข 5.0% Natufian ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
โ€ข 2.2% AASI Onge-Like ๐Ÿ๏ธ

๐Ÿค Genetic Connections:

โ€ข Azerbaijanis of Dagestan ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘11โค2