Forwarded from Survive the Jive: All-feed
Went to see iron age and bronze age British objects in Bristol museum but they said they weren’t on display anymore. Instead they had this woke rubbish
😱4
Genetic Continuity of Bronze Age Ancestry with Increased
Steppe-Related Ancestry in Late Iron Age Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan iron age individuals especially from Serkharakhat had 8% Onge detected
Conclusion:- Using south asian dna while modeling central asians isn't useless
@illyrianometer
Steppe-Related Ancestry in Late Iron Age Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan iron age individuals especially from Serkharakhat had 8% Onge detected
Conclusion:- Using south asian dna while modeling central asians isn't useless
👍2😁1
Uzbekistan europid/non europid analysis based on pca argument used by ethnic nationalists
Europid cluster is cluster which is formed among populations with steppe,anatolian and Western_Hunter_Gatherer admixture
Non europid contains other group out of europid cluster usually additional non europid components
One may take care this analysis has no Paleolithic definition rather Neolithic to bronze age definition
@illyrianometer
Europid cluster is cluster which is formed among populations with steppe,anatolian and Western_Hunter_Gatherer admixture
Non europid contains other group out of europid cluster usually additional non europid components
One may take care this analysis has no Paleolithic definition rather Neolithic to bronze age definition
A subscriber from Kazakhstan g25 autosomal breakdown distance =0.01885400
Proto indo european =24.8%
Proto turk proxy =56.4%
Anatolian Neolithic Farmer=13.4%
Iran Neolithic =5.4%
@illyrianometer
Proto indo european =24.8%
Proto turk proxy =56.4%
Anatolian Neolithic Farmer=13.4%
Iran Neolithic =5.4%
👏10❤2👍2
🧬 Andronovo (Aryan) DNA Breakdown:
Ancient DNA (qpAdm):
🐎 71.7% Proto-Indo-European Steppe
🌾 22.9% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer
🌳 5.3% Western Hunter-Gatherer
🤝 Genetically Close to Modern Northern Europeans:
- Swedish
- Norwegian
- Irish
- Icelandic
@illyrianometer
Ancient DNA (qpAdm):
🐎 71.7% Proto-Indo-European Steppe
🌾 22.9% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer
🌳 5.3% Western Hunter-Gatherer
🤝 Genetically Close to Modern Northern Europeans:
- Swedish
- Norwegian
- Irish
- Icelandic
👍42❤6
👍2
A blow to extreme south asian dna nationalism
Some Subcontinent people try to potray that indo europeans originated from Subcontinent so they try best to show all R based haplogroups came from Subcontinent so that steppe people sound indigenous
There are arguments like indo saka theory and fatyanovo founder effect theory
Indo saka theory is useless since no Subcontinent person scores Mongolia_EIA_SlabGrave_1 proto turk proxy even on qpAdm being robust tool.
Fatyanovo founder effect is also not well established
However if you carefully study swat valley in Subcontinent you will be surprised I2a lineages have been found
I2a is very europid lineage which originated in europe among Villabruna hunter gatherers who gave rise to western hunter gatherers
Some steppe people had this haplogroup too in minority
In nutshell again this proves andronovo invasion/migration is factual and correct
@illyrianometer
Some Subcontinent people try to potray that indo europeans originated from Subcontinent so they try best to show all R based haplogroups came from Subcontinent so that steppe people sound indigenous
There are arguments like indo saka theory and fatyanovo founder effect theory
Indo saka theory is useless since no Subcontinent person scores Mongolia_EIA_SlabGrave_1 proto turk proxy even on qpAdm being robust tool.
Fatyanovo founder effect is also not well established
However if you carefully study swat valley in Subcontinent you will be surprised I2a lineages have been found
I2a is very europid lineage which originated in europe among Villabruna hunter gatherers who gave rise to western hunter gatherers
Some steppe people had this haplogroup too in minority
In nutshell again this proves andronovo invasion/migration is factual and correct
🔥15
🧬 BMAC: Uncovering a Hidden Chapter of Central Asian History
A Pre-Indo-European Population of Central Asia, often overlooked:
Ancient DNA (qpAdm):
🇮🇷 51.1% Iran Neolithic
🌾 20.1% Anatolian Neolithic
🌳 14% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer
🌳 12.7% Western Siberian Hunter-Gatherer
🌳 2.1% Onge (AASI Indian Negrito)
🤝 Genetically Close to:
- Balochi People residing in Pakistan 🇵🇰 and Iran 🇮🇷
They are ancestors of central asia
@illyrianometer
A Pre-Indo-European Population of Central Asia, often overlooked:
Ancient DNA (qpAdm):
🇮🇷 51.1% Iran Neolithic
🌾 20.1% Anatolian Neolithic
🌳 14% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer
🌳 12.7% Western Siberian Hunter-Gatherer
🌳 2.1% Onge (AASI Indian Negrito)
🤝 Genetically Close to:
- Balochi People residing in Pakistan 🇵🇰 and Iran 🇮🇷
They are ancestors of central asia
👍10
Subcontinent syeds aren't really arabic dna mixed like some people claim
They score good amount of south asian dna and they are close other south asians
This dna breakdown model is based on qpAdm analysis done by aryamsa twitter handle where he detected some additional bmac related ancestry in south asians
Overall conclusion is most syeds in south asia aren't arabic dna mixed
@illyrianometer
They score good amount of south asian dna and they are close other south asians
This dna breakdown model is based on qpAdm analysis done by aryamsa twitter handle where he detected some additional bmac related ancestry in south asians
Overall conclusion is most syeds in south asia aren't arabic dna mixed
👍2
🧬 Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer Part 1: Georgia_Kotias qpAdm Analysis
🌳 58% Anatolian Hunter-Gatherer
🧬 22.2% Archaic Lineage related to Zlaty Kun (an archaic European)
🌳 16.4% Ancient Northern Eurasian
🌳 3.4% Ethiopian East African Proxy
Note:-This population contributed in genetics of Caucasus and middle east.A basal form of Caucasus hunter gatherer also contributed in genetics of Proto indo europeans
🤝 Genetically Close to Georgians and Hinukh People
❓ Why an extinct population was used in the model?
- It is based on research and used as a proxy.
📚 Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02211-9
@illyrianometer
🌳 58% Anatolian Hunter-Gatherer
🧬 22.2% Archaic Lineage related to Zlaty Kun (an archaic European)
🌳 16.4% Ancient Northern Eurasian
🌳 3.4% Ethiopian East African Proxy
Note:-This population contributed in genetics of Caucasus and middle east.A basal form of Caucasus hunter gatherer also contributed in genetics of Proto indo europeans
🤝 Genetically Close to Georgians and Hinukh People
❓ Why an extinct population was used in the model?
- It is based on research and used as a proxy.
📚 Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02211-9
👍8🤔3
Regional differences between the average face shapes of Northern (British Isles/Scandinavia/Baltics), Western (Germany, France), Eastern and Southern Europeans. East and North Sea Europeans tend to have more developed cheekbones, outer faces and gonial jaw regions, West Europeans tend to have less developed cheekbones but more developed foreheads and jaws, whilst South Europeans have more developed lips, noses and maxilla. Quite interesting and a more modern attempt at physical anthropology.
From this paper:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-30855-x/figures/4
From this paper:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-30855-x/figures/4
Региональные различия между средними формами лица северных (Британские острова/Скандинавия/Прибалтика), западных (Германия, Франция), восточных и южных европейцев. Европейцы Восточного и Северного морей, как правило, имеют более развитые скулы, внешние поверхности лица и области гониальных челюстей, западные европейцы, как правило, имеют менее развитые скулы, но более развитые лоб и челюсти, в то время как южные европейцы имеют более развитые губы, нос и верхнюю челюсть. Довольно интересная и более современная попытка физической антропологии. Из этой статьи: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-30855-x/figures/4 @
👍7❤1