DNAmeter
2.84K subscribers
1.78K photos
178 videos
54 files
582 links
Channel for posting dna,culture and other stuff.
Any queries contact:- @Messagehere333
Download Telegram
Deep eurasian breakdown of Uzbeks
Caucasoid=60.4%
Mongoloid=34.4%
Australoid=5.2%

Some people claim there is deliberate attempt to make central asia mixed with south asians?


Read a research paper before making such claims

Unlike preceding Copper Age individuals from Turan, people of the BMAC cluster also harbored an additional 2โ€“5% ancestry related (deeply in time) to Andamanese Hunter-Gatherers (AHG).

It is very simple people who don't read research papers often claim works of other people are part of some nationalist agenda





Source:-
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822619/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR15yrWoGg8Dcy6uXpwBGYBuKxGwkVHR35z4v-dj1fiy7mDcXR1GHNCgApM_aem_t9nyNEZqGM_x4vDnPG6ftA

@illyrianometer
Went to see iron age and bronze age British objects in Bristol museum but they said they werenโ€™t on display anymore. Instead they had this woke rubbish
๐Ÿ˜ฑ4
Genetic Continuity of Bronze Age Ancestry with Increased
Steppe-Related Ancestry in Late Iron Age Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan iron age individuals especially from Serkharakhat had 8% Onge detected

Conclusion:- Using south asian dna while modeling central asians isn't useless

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ˜1
BMAC/Oxus Civilization( c. 2250โ€“1700 BC) people reconstruction.
๐Ÿ˜10๐Ÿ‘1
Uzbekistan europid/non europid analysis based on pca argument used by ethnic nationalists

Europid cluster is cluster which is formed among populations with steppe,anatolian and Western_Hunter_Gatherer admixture

Non europid contains other group out of europid cluster usually additional non europid components

One may take care this analysis has no Paleolithic definition rather Neolithic to bronze age definition

@illyrianometer
A subscriber from Kazakhstan g25 autosomal breakdown distance =0.01885400

Proto indo european =24.8%
Proto turk proxy =56.4%
Anatolian Neolithic Farmer=13.4%
Iran Neolithic =5.4%
@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘10โค2๐Ÿ‘2
๐Ÿงฌ Andronovo (Aryan) DNA Breakdown:

Ancient DNA (qpAdm):

๐ŸŽ 71.7% Proto-Indo-European Steppe
๐ŸŒพ 22.9% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer
๐ŸŒณ 5.3% Western Hunter-Gatherer

๐Ÿค Genetically Close to Modern Northern Europeans:
- Swedish
- Norwegian
- Irish
- Icelandic

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘42โค6
Roman gold cup, found in Pompei, Italy Dated to I century BCE.
@illyrianometer
โค2๐Ÿ‘2
Admixture among Post-Medieval Albanians from Kukes, near today's Kosovo
1550 AD
@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘2
A blow to extreme south asian dna nationalism

Some Subcontinent people try to potray that indo europeans originated from Subcontinent so they try best to show all R based haplogroups came from Subcontinent so that steppe people sound indigenous

There are arguments like indo saka theory and fatyanovo founder effect theory
Indo saka theory is useless since no Subcontinent person scores Mongolia_EIA_SlabGrave_1 proto turk proxy even on qpAdm being robust tool.

Fatyanovo founder effect is also not well established

However if you carefully study swat valley in Subcontinent you will be surprised I2a lineages have been found
I2a is very europid lineage which originated in europe among Villabruna hunter gatherers who gave rise to western hunter gatherers

Some steppe people had this haplogroup too in minority

In nutshell again this proves andronovo invasion/migration is factual and correct

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ”ฅ15
๐Ÿงฌ BMAC: Uncovering a Hidden Chapter of Central Asian History

A Pre-Indo-European Population of Central Asia, often overlooked:

Ancient DNA (qpAdm):

๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท 51.1% Iran Neolithic
๐ŸŒพ 20.1% Anatolian Neolithic
๐ŸŒณ 14% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer
๐ŸŒณ 12.7% Western Siberian Hunter-Gatherer
๐ŸŒณ 2.1% Onge (AASI Indian Negrito)

๐Ÿค Genetically Close to:
- Balochi People residing in Pakistan ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฐ and Iran ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ท

They are ancestors of central asia

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘10
Subcontinent syeds aren't really arabic dna mixed like some people claim
They score good amount of south asian dna and they are close other south asians


This dna breakdown model is based on qpAdm analysis done by aryamsa twitter handle where he detected some additional bmac related ancestry in south asians

Overall conclusion is most syeds in south asia aren't arabic dna mixed

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘2
๐Ÿงฌ Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer Part 1: Georgia_Kotias qpAdm Analysis

๐ŸŒณ 58% Anatolian Hunter-Gatherer
๐Ÿงฌ 22.2% Archaic Lineage related to Zlaty Kun (an archaic European)
๐ŸŒณ 16.4% Ancient Northern Eurasian
๐ŸŒณ 3.4% Ethiopian East African Proxy

Note:-This population contributed in genetics of Caucasus and middle east.A basal form of Caucasus hunter gatherer also contributed in genetics of Proto indo europeans

๐Ÿค Genetically Close to Georgians and Hinukh People

โ“ Why an extinct population was used in the model?
- It is based on research and used as a proxy.

๐Ÿ“š Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02211-9

@illyrianometer
๐Ÿ‘8๐Ÿค”3