Admixture among a Post-Medieval Croat

Deep eurasian breakdown of Uzbeks
Caucasoid=60.4%
Mongoloid=34.4%
Australoid=5.2%

Some people claim there is deliberate attempt to make central asia mixed with south asians?


Read a research paper before making such claims

Unlike preceding Copper Age individuals from Turan, people of the BMAC cluster also harbored an additional 2–5% ancestry related (deeply in time) to Andamanese Hunter-Gatherers (AHG).

It is very simple people who don't read research papers often claim works of other people are part of some nationalist agenda





Source:-
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6822619/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR15yrWoGg8Dcy6uXpwBGYBuKxGwkVHR35z4v-dj1fiy7mDcXR1GHNCgApM_aem_t9nyNEZqGM_x4vDnPG6ftA

@illyrianometer

Uzbekistan europid/non europid analysis based on pca argument used by ethnic nationalists

Europid cluster is cluster which is formed among populations with steppe,anatolian and Western_Hunter_Gatherer admixture

Non europid contains other group out of europid cluster usually additional non europid components

One may take care this analysis has no Paleolithic definition rather Neolithic to bronze age definition

@illyrianometer

A subscriber from Kazakhstan g25 autosomal breakdown distance =0.01885400

Proto indo european =24.8%
Proto turk proxy =56.4%
Anatolian Neolithic Farmer=13.4%
Iran Neolithic =5.4%
@illyrianometer

🧬 Andronovo (Aryan) DNA Breakdown:

Ancient DNA (qpAdm):

🐎 71.7% Proto-Indo-European Steppe
🌾 22.9% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer
🌳 5.3% Western Hunter-Gatherer

🤝 Genetically Close to Modern Northern Europeans:
- Swedish
- Norwegian
- Irish
- Icelandic

@illyrianometer

Roman gold cup, found in Pompei, Italy Dated to I century BCE.
@illyrianometer

A blow to extreme south asian dna nationalism

Some Subcontinent people try to potray that indo europeans originated from Subcontinent so they try best to show all R based haplogroups came from Subcontinent so that steppe people sound indigenous

There are arguments like indo saka theory and fatyanovo founder effect theory
Indo saka theory is useless since no Subcontinent person scores Mongolia_EIA_SlabGrave_1 proto turk proxy even on qpAdm being robust tool.

Fatyanovo founder effect is also not well established

However if you carefully study swat valley in Subcontinent you will be surprised I2a lineages have been found
I2a is very europid lineage which originated in europe among Villabruna hunter gatherers who gave rise to western hunter gatherers

Some steppe people had this haplogroup too in minority

In nutshell again this proves andronovo invasion/migration is factual and correct

@illyrianometer

🧬 BMAC: Uncovering a Hidden Chapter of Central Asian History

A Pre-Indo-European Population of Central Asia, often overlooked:

Ancient DNA (qpAdm):

🇮🇷 51.1% Iran Neolithic
🌾 20.1% Anatolian Neolithic
🌳 14% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer
🌳 12.7% Western Siberian Hunter-Gatherer
🌳 2.1% Onge (AASI Indian Negrito)

🤝 Genetically Close to:
- Balochi People residing in Pakistan 🇵🇰 and Iran 🇮🇷

They are ancestors of central asia

@illyrianometer