Colby Badhwar 🇨🇦🇬🇧 (Twitter)

@farsideagm: The US budget deficit isn't caused by discretionary spending, it's caused by non discretionary spending.

IgorGirkin (Twitter)

Тривожно 🫂

Colby Badhwar 🇨🇦🇬🇧 (Twitter)

RT @Havoc_Six: Californians in 2026 after 155mm artillery shells were successfully re-routed to tackle the annual forest fires

Rob Lee (Twitter)

RT @sternenko: ЗБИТО 500 РОСІЙСЬКИХ РОЗВІДУВАЛЬНИХ ДРОНІВ!

Маємо дуже крутий результат — наші воїни з вашою поміччю знищили вже 500 ворожих крил, і це тільки початок🔪

Zala - 263
Supercam - 164
Орлан - 57
Ланцет - 11
Інше - 5

Складно переоцінити цю роботу. Збиті розвідники це безліч врятованих життів та збережена техніка, адже ворог використовує їх саме для подальших ударів, у тому числі балістикою по наших містах.

Крім того, це також і суттєва економія дефіцитних ракет до ЗРК. Раніше на збиття таких цілей витрачали засоби ціною від 100 000 доларів до пари мільйонів, тепер вартість збиття складає менше 1000 доларів.
Економія дозволяє нам частіше збивати і російські ракети, бо ми менше витрачаємо цінний ресурс на БПЛА.

Дякую вам за цю безцінну допомогу!
Закиньте по 2 гривні.
Рятуйте життя!

Rob Lee (Twitter)

Serhii Sternenko announced that 500 Russian UAVs have been downed through his fundraising efforts, including 263 Zala, 164 Supercam, 57 Orlan, 11 Lancet, and 5 other UAVs. 99/
t.me/ssternenko/38565

The Lookout (Twitter)

@OccTranspo: Conceptually, I think very little has changed since WW2, so looking at history is still very valuable.

Especially so when looking at a type of operation which, with the exception of Inchon and the Falklands, hasn't been conducted since then.

Colby Badhwar 🇨🇦🇬🇧 (Twitter)

RT @heatloss1986: During the development of the Tomahawk Cruise missile, an airfield attack version was proposed.
This was to utilize runway-cratering submunitions as an alternative to manned missions or nuclear strikes to disable a Soviet airfield in a war.
This was MRASM BKEP, or AGM-109H.
🧵

The Lookout (Twitter)

@OccTranspo: Reaction times are shorter now but that's about it, thinking conceptually, and not diving into specific systems. Over the horizon targeting still remains a challenge which is why you shouldn't be fixated on range rings.

Naval equipment isn't marginalized. Why do you think the Chinese are conducting one of the larger naval buildups in history?

‌The Lookout (Twitter)

Well worth reading if you are interested in navigation.

The Lookout (Twitter)

@KEdvardson: I don't think that much has changed conceptually since then, except that reaction times are shorter now.

The Japanese could escort land based bombers beyond 500 nautical miles, and back, in 1942. To me, conceptually, their role was the same as the long range missiles of today.

As back then, air superiority and good enough sea control remains the keys for a successful amphibious operation.

Rob Lee (Twitter)

RT @TonyaLevchuk: Hello from the 95th Brigade...
Can you identify the type of this downed drone?

To help this unit with more drones - https://libertyukraine.org/quadcopters