Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@Zagonel85: Those strikes are all from old hits, all the major ones. They are from months ago, some from 2022
So where are the new big Oreshink strikes?
Green 🟢 confirmed strikes from the past (1st photo)
Red 🟥 where Oreshink hit
Thin Yellow 🟡 confirmed strikes from past (3rd photo)
@Zagonel85: Those strikes are all from old hits, all the major ones. They are from months ago, some from 2022
So where are the new big Oreshink strikes?
Green 🟢 confirmed strikes from the past (1st photo)
Red 🟥 where Oreshink hit
Thin Yellow 🟡 confirmed strikes from past (3rd photo)
🤡1
Dan (Twitter)
@moklasen: Wow, posted almost 2 hours ago and surprised no ones left any media yet of wrecked and burning BTR-82As - for example north west of Kruglen'koe or countless other examples.
@moklasen: Wow, posted almost 2 hours ago and surprised no ones left any media yet of wrecked and burning BTR-82As - for example north west of Kruglen'koe or countless other examples.
Rob Lee (Twitter)
@thinkdefence: How to build a proper brigade and battalion defense in modern warfare conditions is one of the best lessons we can draw from the Ukrainians.
@thinkdefence: How to build a proper brigade and battalion defense in modern warfare conditions is one of the best lessons we can draw from the Ukrainians.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Necro Mancer (Twitter)
Оператор российского "Мавика" вообразил себя камикадзе и будет внеочерёдно переведён в штурма
t.me/blackraven93ua/260 #дроноцид
Оператор российского "Мавика" вообразил себя камикадзе и будет внеочерёдно переведён в штурма
t.me/blackraven93ua/260 #дроноцид
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dan (Twitter)
RT @bayraktar_1love: Wild. A Russian BTR-D runs over two Russian infantrymen while unloading into position. None of the rest of the group even thought about trying to help them in any way. t.me/BFBoiko/305
RT @bayraktar_1love: Wild. A Russian BTR-D runs over two Russian infantrymen while unloading into position. None of the rest of the group even thought about trying to help them in any way. t.me/BFBoiko/305
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@Zagonel85: Show us a single strike that Oreshink made penetrating the factory roof.
A single strike that did not occur before November 21st, 2024? Instead of laughing like an idiot, could you show us the evidence? We can start with just one.
@Zagonel85: Show us a single strike that Oreshink made penetrating the factory roof.
A single strike that did not occur before November 21st, 2024? Instead of laughing like an idiot, could you show us the evidence? We can start with just one.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Rob Lee (Twitter)
Russian telegram channels posted videos of fiber optic cable FPV strikes on a Ukrainian Abrams tank in Kursk oblast last week. Aside from a concussion, the crew survived without injury and made it back to friendly lines. @KofmanMichael and I spoke to the commander of the tank from Ukraine's 47th Mechanized Brigade about what happened, and here is what he told us: (tweeted with his permission)
"That's our tank. But they only posted two of the strikes. Yesterday [from last week] was the first time that the crew survived multiple hits while inside a disabled Abrams. Actually, there were 4-6 direct hits. The crew survived, and even without injuries. God bless America.
Fiber-optic FPVs. Between four and six hits within like 2 minutes. I believe that at least one more got stuck in the net. Two more missed several minutes before.
They apparently hit the engine. They were unable to penetrate either the turret or the hull elsewhere while we were inside....
Перейти на оригинальный пост
Russian telegram channels posted videos of fiber optic cable FPV strikes on a Ukrainian Abrams tank in Kursk oblast last week. Aside from a concussion, the crew survived without injury and made it back to friendly lines. @KofmanMichael and I spoke to the commander of the tank from Ukraine's 47th Mechanized Brigade about what happened, and here is what he told us: (tweeted with his permission)
"That's our tank. But they only posted two of the strikes. Yesterday [from last week] was the first time that the crew survived multiple hits while inside a disabled Abrams. Actually, there were 4-6 direct hits. The crew survived, and even without injuries. God bless America.
Fiber-optic FPVs. Between four and six hits within like 2 minutes. I believe that at least one more got stuck in the net. Two more missed several minutes before.
They apparently hit the engine. They were unable to penetrate either the turret or the hull elsewhere while we were inside....
Перейти на оригинальный пост
🤬4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Status-6 (Twitter)
RT @RALee85: Russian telegram channels posted videos of fiber optic cable FPV strikes on a Ukrainian Abrams tank in Kursk oblast last week. Aside from a concussion, the crew survived without injury and made it back to friendly lines. @KofmanMichael and I spoke to the commander of the tank from Ukraine's 47th Mechanized Brigade about what happened, and here is what he told us: (tweeted with his permission)
"That's our tank. But they only posted two of the strikes. Yesterday [from last week] was the first time that the crew survived multiple hits whileide a disabled Abrams. Actually, there were 4-6 direct hits. The crew survived, and even without injuries. God bless America.
Fiber-optic FPVs. Between four and six hits within like 2 minutes. I believe that at least one more got stuck in the net. Two more missed several minutes before.
They apparently hit the engine. They were unable to penetrate either the turret or the hull elsewhere while we were...
Перейти на оригинальный пост
RT @RALee85: Russian telegram channels posted videos of fiber optic cable FPV strikes on a Ukrainian Abrams tank in Kursk oblast last week. Aside from a concussion, the crew survived without injury and made it back to friendly lines. @KofmanMichael and I spoke to the commander of the tank from Ukraine's 47th Mechanized Brigade about what happened, and here is what he told us: (tweeted with his permission)
"That's our tank. But they only posted two of the strikes. Yesterday [from last week] was the first time that the crew survived multiple hits whileide a disabled Abrams. Actually, there were 4-6 direct hits. The crew survived, and even without injuries. God bless America.
Fiber-optic FPVs. Between four and six hits within like 2 minutes. I believe that at least one more got stuck in the net. Two more missed several minutes before.
They apparently hit the engine. They were unable to penetrate either the turret or the hull elsewhere while we were...
Перейти на оригинальный пост
Rob Lee (Twitter)
Some of his takeaways about using the Abrams in combat:
"1. The Abrams is a great tank. Thanks to the fact that the ammo is completely separated from the crew, the crew has a chance to survive (unlike in the T series tanks).
2. Without the additional ERA and 'cope netting' on top of the turret, we would have been smashed and surely dead by now without any chance. The tank's armour is weak, and it is vulnerable (as any other tank) to FPV drones.
3. The crew survived multiple FPV hits inside the tank thanks to the aforementioned ERA and 'cope netting'. We as as crew were allowed to install the protection as we liked, we analysed everything we could, we did a huge job, and this saved our lives in the long run.
4. The most valuable advantage of the Abrams is that, when having MUCH additional armour and a thorough approach, it saves human lives, even in DIRE conditions.
5. We, the crew(s), are in love with this tank and are immensely grateful to the United States.
6. If the US provided the tanks with the original armour and the complete ARAT 1/2 kits, this would make us more protected (although the top would still remain unprotected and we would need Kontakt-1, etc.).
7. The American tankers should act promptly. Their tanks are too thin and vulnerable given the current threats on the battlefield. Protect your tanks urgently to avoid losses in potential near-future conflicts, taking into account our experience."
He also added that the Abram's weight isn't a significant problem even with 2-3 tons of additional weight from ERA.
It is also important to note that Ukraine did not receive the latest version of the Abrams and they were sent the export version without depleted uranium armor.
Some of his takeaways about using the Abrams in combat:
"1. The Abrams is a great tank. Thanks to the fact that the ammo is completely separated from the crew, the crew has a chance to survive (unlike in the T series tanks).
2. Without the additional ERA and 'cope netting' on top of the turret, we would have been smashed and surely dead by now without any chance. The tank's armour is weak, and it is vulnerable (as any other tank) to FPV drones.
3. The crew survived multiple FPV hits inside the tank thanks to the aforementioned ERA and 'cope netting'. We as as crew were allowed to install the protection as we liked, we analysed everything we could, we did a huge job, and this saved our lives in the long run.
4. The most valuable advantage of the Abrams is that, when having MUCH additional armour and a thorough approach, it saves human lives, even in DIRE conditions.
5. We, the crew(s), are in love with this tank and are immensely grateful to the United States.
6. If the US provided the tanks with the original armour and the complete ARAT 1/2 kits, this would make us more protected (although the top would still remain unprotected and we would need Kontakt-1, etc.).
7. The American tankers should act promptly. Their tanks are too thin and vulnerable given the current threats on the battlefield. Protect your tanks urgently to avoid losses in potential near-future conflicts, taking into account our experience."
He also added that the Abram's weight isn't a significant problem even with 2-3 tons of additional weight from ERA.
It is also important to note that Ukraine did not receive the latest version of the Abrams and they were sent the export version without depleted uranium armor.
❤1
Status-6 (Twitter)
RT @RALee85: Some of his takeaways about using the Abrams in combat:
"1. The Abrams is a great tank. Thanks to the fact that the ammo is completely separated from the crew, the crew has a chance to survive (unlike in the T series tanks).
2. Without the additional ERA and 'cope netting' on top of the turret, we would have been smashed and surely dead by now without any chance. The tank's armour is weak, and it is vulnerable (as any other tank) to FPV drones.
3. The crew survived multiple FPV hits inside the tank thanks to the aforementioned ERA and 'cope netting'. We as as crew were allowed to install the protection as we liked, we analysed everything we could, we did a huge job, and this saved our lives in the long run.
4. The most valuable advantage of the Abrams is that, when having MUCH additional armour and a thorough approach, it saves human lives, even in DIRE conditions.
5. We, the crew(s), are in love with this tank and are immensely grateful to the United States.
6. If the US provided the tanks with the original armour and the complete ARAT 1/2 kits, this would make us more protected (although the top would still remain unprotected and we would need Kontakt-1, etc.).
7. The American tankers should act promptly. Their tanks are too thin and vulnerable given the current threats on the battlefield. Protect your tanks urgently to avoid losses in potential near-future conflicts, taking into account our experience."
He also added that the Abram's weight isn't a significant problem even with 2-3 tons of additional weight from ERA.
It is also important to note that Ukraine did not receive the latest version of the Abrams and they were sent the export version without depleted uranium armor.
RT @RALee85: Some of his takeaways about using the Abrams in combat:
"1. The Abrams is a great tank. Thanks to the fact that the ammo is completely separated from the crew, the crew has a chance to survive (unlike in the T series tanks).
2. Without the additional ERA and 'cope netting' on top of the turret, we would have been smashed and surely dead by now without any chance. The tank's armour is weak, and it is vulnerable (as any other tank) to FPV drones.
3. The crew survived multiple FPV hits inside the tank thanks to the aforementioned ERA and 'cope netting'. We as as crew were allowed to install the protection as we liked, we analysed everything we could, we did a huge job, and this saved our lives in the long run.
4. The most valuable advantage of the Abrams is that, when having MUCH additional armour and a thorough approach, it saves human lives, even in DIRE conditions.
5. We, the crew(s), are in love with this tank and are immensely grateful to the United States.
6. If the US provided the tanks with the original armour and the complete ARAT 1/2 kits, this would make us more protected (although the top would still remain unprotected and we would need Kontakt-1, etc.).
7. The American tankers should act promptly. Their tanks are too thin and vulnerable given the current threats on the battlefield. Protect your tanks urgently to avoid losses in potential near-future conflicts, taking into account our experience."
He also added that the Abram's weight isn't a significant problem even with 2-3 tons of additional weight from ERA.
It is also important to note that Ukraine did not receive the latest version of the Abrams and they were sent the export version without depleted uranium armor.