Dan (Twitter)
RT @shashj: “Defence sources say that one option under consideration is sending British troops to Ukraine to help train their forces. Speaking to the BBC, Healey declined to give specifics.”
RT @shashj: “Defence sources say that one option under consideration is sending British troops to Ukraine to help train their forces. Speaking to the BBC, Healey declined to give specifics.”
BBC News
UK considers sending troops to Ukraine to help train its forces
Defence Secretary John Healey visits Kyiv to discuss plans to provide more support to Ukraine.
Dan (Twitter)
@GorakhIn @shashj: Little risk if the training program is carefully planned/located.
But why risk? Simple - because the defeat of Ukraine poses a greater risk to long term UK and Euro security.
This helps avoid a later war in NATO border countries where the UK would certainly have more casualties.
@GorakhIn @shashj: Little risk if the training program is carefully planned/located.
But why risk? Simple - because the defeat of Ukraine poses a greater risk to long term UK and Euro security.
This helps avoid a later war in NATO border countries where the UK would certainly have more casualties.
The Lookout (Twitter)
There are developments in the Yi Peng 3 case today.
https://polisen.se/aktuellt/nyheter/nationell/2024/december/observer-role-for-police-on-chinese-vessel/
There are developments in the Yi Peng 3 case today.
https://polisen.se/aktuellt/nyheter/nationell/2024/december/observer-role-for-police-on-chinese-vessel/
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Status-6 (Twitter)
Russian President Putin believes that a ceasefire would give Ukraine the opportunity to rearm and regroup.
"We don't need a truce. We need a long-term, lasting peace with security guarantees for the Russian Federation and its citizens."
Russian President Putin believes that a ceasefire would give Ukraine the opportunity to rearm and regroup.
"We don't need a truce. We need a long-term, lasting peace with security guarantees for the Russian Federation and its citizens."
🤡10👍2😁1
The Lookout (Twitter)
The Danish Minister of Foreign Affairs expeuct that Yi Peng 3 will continue her voyage after today's inspection.
https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/udland/svensk-politi-gaar-ombord-paa-kinesisk-fragtskib-i-kattegat
The Danish Minister of Foreign Affairs expeuct that Yi Peng 3 will continue her voyage after today's inspection.
https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/udland/svensk-politi-gaar-ombord-paa-kinesisk-fragtskib-i-kattegat
DR
Svensk politi går ombord på kinesisk fragtskib i Kattegat
Danske myndigheder faciliterer besøget, lyder det.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@ukraine_map @Maks_NAFO_FELLA: He forgot to show his followers these bodies.
@ukraine_map @Maks_NAFO_FELLA: He forgot to show his followers these bodies.
👍1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@Maks_NAFO_FELLA: Thank god they didn’t spend $150 billion because that would be too much escalation and would probably cause WW3.
@Maks_NAFO_FELLA: Thank god they didn’t spend $150 billion because that would be too much escalation and would probably cause WW3.
The Lookout (Twitter)
@oroborous: It's the Chinese, as flag state, that's conducting today's inspection/investigation. The other nationalities are onboard just as observers.
International waters make the legal side complicated,so doubt anyone will be arrested today.
@oroborous: It's the Chinese, as flag state, that's conducting today's inspection/investigation. The other nationalities are onboard just as observers.
International waters make the legal side complicated,so doubt anyone will be arrested today.
The Lookout (Twitter)
This is just a hunch, but I do doubt that the next merchant ship that drags its anchor across any sea floor infrastructure will be Chinese flagged.
This is just a hunch, but I do doubt that the next merchant ship that drags its anchor across any sea floor infrastructure will be Chinese flagged.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@fbhenriknilsson @ITWorldPM: Most are increases in Shaheds due to them being shot down more when fired at low rates. Now Russia fires 50 to 100 Shaheds per day because the production rate increased due to the necessity of larger Shahed strikes and electronic warfare. Almost all Shaheds get shot down daily.
@fbhenriknilsson @ITWorldPM: Most are increases in Shaheds due to them being shot down more when fired at low rates. Now Russia fires 50 to 100 Shaheds per day because the production rate increased due to the necessity of larger Shahed strikes and electronic warfare. Almost all Shaheds get shot down daily.
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
Another collection point for killed Russian and North Korean troops on the Kursk front.
t.me/ua_regteam/260
Another collection point for killed Russian and North Korean troops on the Kursk front.
t.me/ua_regteam/260
🎉7🤯1
The Lookout (Twitter)
RT @Poland_MOD: 🇳🇴Norwegian #NASAMS anti-aircraft systems deployed & ready to protect the logistics hub in Rzeszów. F-35 aircraft have also been sent to 🇵🇱Poland to support the defence of PL airspace. The NATO's mission will last until Easter. 100 🇳🇴soldiers will also be sent to 🇵🇱Rzeszów. https://twitter.com/DGeneralneRSZ/status/1869725424327983184#m
RT @Poland_MOD: 🇳🇴Norwegian #NASAMS anti-aircraft systems deployed & ready to protect the logistics hub in Rzeszów. F-35 aircraft have also been sent to 🇵🇱Poland to support the defence of PL airspace. The NATO's mission will last until Easter. 100 🇳🇴soldiers will also be sent to 🇵🇱Rzeszów. https://twitter.com/DGeneralneRSZ/status/1869725424327983184#m
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@TorbenAnschau @front_ukrainian: To say they need one thing more than they need another is a total losing strategy and has shown to be unsuccessful in the long run. Yes, Ukraine needs as many long-range missiles as possible, which they do not currently have and won’t have for a long time, to strike deep into Russia, where there are much less dense air defenses than in occupied Ukraine. The most densely packed air defenses are in occupied Ukraine of the ~120,000km2 of it vs the +800,000km2 of territory that those same air defenses would have to be allocated to if Ukraine was allowed to strike inside Russia with ATACMS, Taurus, SCALP-EG, and Storm Shadow with no restrictions. These excuses to keep restrictions and not send Ukraine enough missiles have led Russia to move most of their major ammo depots, military command centers, production, and fighter jets out of Ukraine into Russia while bringing their air defense systems into Ukraine and causing Western missiles to be shot down at much higher rates, and lesser important targets to be hit, while Western restrictions and weakness are protecting the more essential hundreds of targets in Russia.
Also, saying that one weapon won’t change the war is pretty apparent. Nobody claims that deep strikes into Russia will change the war, but without them, the war is also not winnable, and damage inflicted on Russia militarily, politically, and economically will be much less severe. Instead of making these excuses, provide Ukraine with the necessary aid and stop thinking Ukraine has or will ever have the necessary production or stockpile to defeat Russia or do meaningful strikes in Russia to win the war.
@TorbenAnschau @front_ukrainian: To say they need one thing more than they need another is a total losing strategy and has shown to be unsuccessful in the long run. Yes, Ukraine needs as many long-range missiles as possible, which they do not currently have and won’t have for a long time, to strike deep into Russia, where there are much less dense air defenses than in occupied Ukraine. The most densely packed air defenses are in occupied Ukraine of the ~120,000km2 of it vs the +800,000km2 of territory that those same air defenses would have to be allocated to if Ukraine was allowed to strike inside Russia with ATACMS, Taurus, SCALP-EG, and Storm Shadow with no restrictions. These excuses to keep restrictions and not send Ukraine enough missiles have led Russia to move most of their major ammo depots, military command centers, production, and fighter jets out of Ukraine into Russia while bringing their air defense systems into Ukraine and causing Western missiles to be shot down at much higher rates, and lesser important targets to be hit, while Western restrictions and weakness are protecting the more essential hundreds of targets in Russia.
Also, saying that one weapon won’t change the war is pretty apparent. Nobody claims that deep strikes into Russia will change the war, but without them, the war is also not winnable, and damage inflicted on Russia militarily, politically, and economically will be much less severe. Instead of making these excuses, provide Ukraine with the necessary aid and stop thinking Ukraine has or will ever have the necessary production or stockpile to defeat Russia or do meaningful strikes in Russia to win the war.
😁1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@WarMonitors: Just absolutely amazing. A terrorist country’s ambassador was killed that day.
@WarMonitors: Just absolutely amazing. A terrorist country’s ambassador was killed that day.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Necro Mancer (Twitter)
RT @donikroman: 1. Одна з наших заслуг, (скромно так - крім багатьох інших) це те що в центрі нічого не робиться для показухи, "постанови", "для красоти" або "чинопочитання". Всі без виключення їдять з одного котла. Рекрут, інструктор, викладач, командир. Не тому що показушна псевдодемократія.
RT @donikroman: 1. Одна з наших заслуг, (скромно так - крім багатьох інших) це те що в центрі нічого не робиться для показухи, "постанови", "для красоти" або "чинопочитання". Всі без виключення їдять з одного котла. Рекрут, інструктор, викладач, командир. Не тому що показушна псевдодемократія.