Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@clashreport: 575 x Kh-55SM cruise missiles so Russia could threaten and bomb Ukraine with those missiles 16 years later.

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@C_C_Codegeass_ @clashreport: They belonged to the Soviet Union not only Russia. Russia like Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union. The countries who had military equipment in it, including Russia inherited it. Russia inherited a lot of equipment made in Ukraine as well. That’s how inheritance works.

‌Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@clashreport: The military equipment, including Kh-55 cruise missiles and bombers, belonged to the Soviet Union before the Soviet Union broke apart, then to each respective country like Ukraine 🇺🇦 and others, not only Russia

Russia is not the same as the Soviet Union. It’s one of the countries that was formed after the Soviet Union broke apart. All countries contributed to the Soviet Union. Ukraine was a massive contributor to designing and building military equipment that Russia has today, including long-range missiles, aircraft carriers, and tanks.

This habit of equating everything the Soviet Union had as being only Russian is nonsense and complete propaganda. Is Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania also Russia because they were part of the Soviet Union by your logic?

Just like Ukraine has MiG-29s from the Soviet Union when it broke apart, those are not Russia’s MiG-29s; they are the Soviet Union’s MiG-29s that Ukraine inherited, as did Russia also inherit Russian Soviet Equipment. It’s like saying that if the US broke apart, all weapons belonged to Washington, DC.

There is no need to sell something that is not already yours. Ukraine was selling bombers and other military equipment to Russia. The same equipment Russia has used to threaten and destroy Ukraine on a daily basis for the past 10 years.

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@Tendar: Russian telegram channels said that Russia shot down 7 of 8 ATACMS yesterday over Kursk. It turns out that at least 5 ATACMS were not shot down, with no evidence of even one being shot down

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@OnehourMahhn: Look at the recent satellite images, there is no new damage to any of those buildings from that strike. Those are dummy warheads, that produced no explosions, and have a 250-meter CEP. The reason Russia used it is because it is an experimental missile with no nuclear warheads.

IgorGirkin (Twitter)

RT @TseyYenotKusaye: В одному вигаданому підрозділі один вигаданий мінометник:
Міни ми переважуємо, різниця від міни до міни 35 грамів (з одного ящика одного вагового знаку), підривачі не працюють, відкручуємо підривачі, ліпимо пластид під підривачі. Вишибні не працюють⬇️

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@warfareanalysis @CommunityNotes: It still surprises me that you think that strategy would ever work.

Everyone already knows about Israel-Palestine. You’re either reaching someone who is Pro-Israel or Pro-Palestine, or leaning slightly one way or the other, or in this case you maybe reaching people who are Pro-Ukraine but neutral on Palestine.

You start off by lying to them about the Ukraine conflict. But then expect them to believe what you say about another conflict. I will to bet there is not a single account you convinced with that post after spreading fake information to half a million people.

It’s not about getting the most information out to people, because you can get anybody to see what you’re posting. The challenge is convincing them, and you won’t convince them once you lost their trust in your reporting. Why not try another strategy?

I know plenty of people who are Pro-Ukrainian and neutral of Palestine. Why not trying to tie some similarities to each conflict. Like they are both being invaded, or both being bomb, or both have civilians impacted. That would get you more people to believe you, because the perspective you are showing, what about Palestine, people have seen it a million times already for the past year. They need something new to convince them.

So if it’s truly your goal to get more people to see the impact of the conflict or reconsider their opinions. You’ll need to come up with some more effective strategies. But people see that, and it doesn’t make anyone else more Pro-Palestine, in fact it makes them take a more negative view on conflict. All I am saying is if you want to convince people, coming up with a different, better, and truthful strategy is the best way to go.

Necro Mancer (Twitter)

Мото-, авто-, буханкоцид
t.me/ssternenko/36642 t.me/ssternenko/36652 t.me/wild_hornets/2174 t.me/ssternenko/36670 #RussianUkrainianWar

Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)

@warfareanalysis @CommunityNotes: It still surprises me that you think that strategy would ever work.

Everyone already knows about Israel-Palestine. You’re either reaching someone who is Pro-Israel or Pro-Palestine, or leaning slightly one way or the other, or in this case you maybe reaching people who are Pro-Ukraine but neutral on Palestine.

You start off by lying to them about the Ukraine conflict. But then expect them to believe what you say about another conflict. I will to bet there is not a single account you convinced with that post after spreading fake information to half a million people.

It’s not about getting the most information out to people, because you can get anybody to see what you’re posting. The challenge is convincing them, and you won’t convince them once you lost their trust in your reporting. Why not try another strategy?

I know plenty of people who are Pro-Ukrainian and neutral of Palestine. Why not trying to tie some similarities to each conflict. Like they are both being invaded, or both being bomb, or both have civilians impacted. That would get you more people to believe you, because the perspective you are showing, what about Palestine, people have seen it a million times already for the past year. They need something new to convince them.

So if it’s truly your goal to get more people to see the impact of the conflict or reconsider their opinions. You’ll need to come up with some more effective strategies. But people see that, and it doesn’t make anyone else more Pro-Palestine, in fact it makes them take a more negative view on conflict. All I am saying is if you want to convince people, coming up with a different, better, and truthful strategy is the best way to go.

Necro Mancer (Twitter)

ППП: поточный пехотоцид продолжается
t.me/ngu_3027/3348 t.me/ssternenko/36662 t.me/ogshb8/547 t.me/black_swan_ukraine/241 #RussianUkrainianWar

IgorGirkin (Twitter)

RT @DPSU_ua: «Фенікси» на Донеччині влаштували демілітаризаційний феєрверк🎆

У підсумку окупанти втратили:
✔️2 танки
✔️РСЗВ БМ-21 «Град»
✔️6 гармат
✔️міномет 2Б9 «Васильок»

Бійці «Помсти» @luhanskdpsu також спалили 2 склади БК, пункт управління БпЛА, установку РЕБ та автомобіль окупантів

IgorGirkin (Twitter)

Who cares about ru worms