IgorGirkin (Twitter)
Shatura strike officially confirmed
Important: no debris situation https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1992481588333146211#m
Shatura strike officially confirmed
Important: no debris situation https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1992481588333146211#m
❤2
IgorGirkin (Twitter)
Shatura strike officially confirmed
Important 1: no debris situation
Important 2: and the turbine shop caught fire as a result of the attack https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1992481588333146211#m
Shatura strike officially confirmed
Important 1: no debris situation
Important 2: and the turbine shop caught fire as a result of the attack https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1992481588333146211#m
❤3
Status-6 (Twitter)
A closer look at fires on the territory of the Shatura Power Station in Russia's Moscow Oblast caused by Ukrainian strikes this morning. https://twitter.com/Archer83Able/status/1992469282719232498#m
A closer look at fires on the territory of the Shatura Power Station in Russia's Moscow Oblast caused by Ukrainian strikes this morning. https://twitter.com/Archer83Able/status/1992469282719232498#m
❤2
Status-6 (Twitter)
RT @counterconor: Understanding half the spam political accounts are in India or Russia is a psychic relief for this website. https://twitter.com/DylanMcD8/status/1992073139178877187#m
RT @counterconor: Understanding half the spam political accounts are in India or Russia is a psychic relief for this website. https://twitter.com/DylanMcD8/status/1992073139178877187#m
Status-6 (Twitter)
RT @RobbieGramer: So to sum up:
- Plan leaks
- US confirms plan real
- (Some) senators condemn plan
- Senators say Rubio calls them, denies it’s real plan
- White House denies that denial
- Rubio says yes it is real starting plan
RT @RobbieGramer: So to sum up:
- Plan leaks
- US confirms plan real
- (Some) senators condemn plan
- Senators say Rubio calls them, denies it’s real plan
- White House denies that denial
- Rubio says yes it is real starting plan
🤪2😱1🙊1
Status-6 (Twitter)
RT @EerikNKross: Spent my Saturday analysing the 28-point plan. The result:
If the US is seriously considering enforcing this plan, it would place itself in violation of:
• 13 binding treaties and international instruments
• 23 political commitments, declarations, and authoritative resolutions
• 35 explicit articles, clauses, and legal principles
Total: 71 separate international legal or political obligations.
Full analysis below — and keep in mind that even this list is far from exhaustive.
.........
This is structured by principles. Under each principle I first state the core rule, then list key treaties/commitments, and show which points of the Witkoff–Dmitriev 28-point plan collide with them.
(References to the plan use its point numbers.)
I. Non-recognition of territorial acquisition by force and Ukraine’s territorial integrity
Core idea: No state may recognize as lawful any territorial change achieved by aggression; all states must respect Ukraine’s territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders.
Key commitments and instruments the US is bound to or has endorsed
UN Charter
– Article 2(4): prohibition on the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.
– Creates peremptory norms (jus cogens) and erga omnes obligations not to recognize or assist serious breaches.
UN General Assembly resolutions on Ukraine’s territorial integrity
– Resolution 68/262 (2014) “Territorial integrity of Ukraine” (Crimea).
– Resolution ES-11/1 (2022) “Aggression against Ukraine”.
– Resolution ES-11/4 (2022) “Territorial integrity of Ukraine: defending the principles of the Charter of the United Nations”, which:
• declares the referendums and annexation of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia “invalid” and “illegal under international law”;
• calls on all states not to recognize these territories as part of Russia and demands Russia’s full withdrawal.
Declaration on Friendly Relations (UNGA Res. 2625, 1970)
– States that no territorial acquisition resulting from the threat or use of force shall be recognized as legal
Definition of Aggression (UNGA Res. 3314, 1974)
– Reiterates that no territorial acquisition or special advantage resulting from aggression is or shall be recognized as lawful.
OSCE Helsinki Final Act (1975) and Charter of Paris for a New Europe (1990)
– Inviolability of frontiers; territorial changes only in conformity with international law and by peaceful agreement, not by force.
PACE Resolution 2605 (June 2025) on the legal and human rights aspects/consequences of Russia’s aggression
– Stresses that inviolability of borders and non-recognition of territorial acquisitions resulting from use of force are core tenets of international law and of the rules-based order.
UNGA Resolution ES-11/5 (2022) on remedies and reparations for Ukraine
– Reaffirms Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and links it to accountability and reparations.
How the Witkoff–Dmitriev plan conflicts
– Point 21:
• “Crimea, Luhansk and Donetsk will be recognised as de facto Russian, including by the United States.”
• Kherson and Zaporizhzhia “frozen along the line of contact,” amounting to de facto recognition.
• Part of Donetsk Oblast that Ukraine currently controls is to be vacated by Ukraine and the withdrawal zone is to be “internationally recognised as territory belonging to the Russian Federation.”
– Point 2: “All ambiguities of the last 30 years will be considered settled” – in context, this means settling Russia’s unlawful territorial gains and closing the file.
By agreeing to these, the US would:
• directly contradict multiple UNGA resolutions it voted for (68/262, ES-11/1, ES-11/4, ES-11/5);
• breach the customary principle of non-recognition of territorial acquisition by force;
• undermine OSCE commitments and the PACE line that such acquisitions must never be recognized.
II. Sovereign right of states to choose their own alliances and foreign policy (no “sphere of...
Перейти на оригинальный пост
RT @EerikNKross: Spent my Saturday analysing the 28-point plan. The result:
If the US is seriously considering enforcing this plan, it would place itself in violation of:
• 13 binding treaties and international instruments
• 23 political commitments, declarations, and authoritative resolutions
• 35 explicit articles, clauses, and legal principles
Total: 71 separate international legal or political obligations.
Full analysis below — and keep in mind that even this list is far from exhaustive.
.........
This is structured by principles. Under each principle I first state the core rule, then list key treaties/commitments, and show which points of the Witkoff–Dmitriev 28-point plan collide with them.
(References to the plan use its point numbers.)
I. Non-recognition of territorial acquisition by force and Ukraine’s territorial integrity
Core idea: No state may recognize as lawful any territorial change achieved by aggression; all states must respect Ukraine’s territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders.
Key commitments and instruments the US is bound to or has endorsed
UN Charter
– Article 2(4): prohibition on the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.
– Creates peremptory norms (jus cogens) and erga omnes obligations not to recognize or assist serious breaches.
UN General Assembly resolutions on Ukraine’s territorial integrity
– Resolution 68/262 (2014) “Territorial integrity of Ukraine” (Crimea).
– Resolution ES-11/1 (2022) “Aggression against Ukraine”.
– Resolution ES-11/4 (2022) “Territorial integrity of Ukraine: defending the principles of the Charter of the United Nations”, which:
• declares the referendums and annexation of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia “invalid” and “illegal under international law”;
• calls on all states not to recognize these territories as part of Russia and demands Russia’s full withdrawal.
Declaration on Friendly Relations (UNGA Res. 2625, 1970)
– States that no territorial acquisition resulting from the threat or use of force shall be recognized as legal
Definition of Aggression (UNGA Res. 3314, 1974)
– Reiterates that no territorial acquisition or special advantage resulting from aggression is or shall be recognized as lawful.
OSCE Helsinki Final Act (1975) and Charter of Paris for a New Europe (1990)
– Inviolability of frontiers; territorial changes only in conformity with international law and by peaceful agreement, not by force.
PACE Resolution 2605 (June 2025) on the legal and human rights aspects/consequences of Russia’s aggression
– Stresses that inviolability of borders and non-recognition of territorial acquisitions resulting from use of force are core tenets of international law and of the rules-based order.
UNGA Resolution ES-11/5 (2022) on remedies and reparations for Ukraine
– Reaffirms Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and links it to accountability and reparations.
How the Witkoff–Dmitriev plan conflicts
– Point 21:
• “Crimea, Luhansk and Donetsk will be recognised as de facto Russian, including by the United States.”
• Kherson and Zaporizhzhia “frozen along the line of contact,” amounting to de facto recognition.
• Part of Donetsk Oblast that Ukraine currently controls is to be vacated by Ukraine and the withdrawal zone is to be “internationally recognised as territory belonging to the Russian Federation.”
– Point 2: “All ambiguities of the last 30 years will be considered settled” – in context, this means settling Russia’s unlawful territorial gains and closing the file.
By agreeing to these, the US would:
• directly contradict multiple UNGA resolutions it voted for (68/262, ES-11/1, ES-11/4, ES-11/5);
• breach the customary principle of non-recognition of territorial acquisition by force;
• undermine OSCE commitments and the PACE line that such acquisitions must never be recognized.
II. Sovereign right of states to choose their own alliances and foreign policy (no “sphere of...
Перейти на оригинальный пост
💯2❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
During the night, drones targeted the Shaturskaya Thermal Power Plant in the Moscow region.
During the night, drones targeted the Shaturskaya Thermal Power Plant in the Moscow region.
🤣4🤮1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
Shaturskaya Thermal Power Plant in the Moscow region after the night drone strikes. https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1992494774901952692#m
Shaturskaya Thermal Power Plant in the Moscow region after the night drone strikes. https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1992494774901952692#m
👍6🤮1🤣1
IgorGirkin (Twitter)
A dozen mobile power plants of Mosobenergo are stationed at the city entrance. https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1992494188328550587#m
A dozen mobile power plants of Mosobenergo are stationed at the city entrance. https://twitter.com/GirkinGirkin/status/1992494188328550587#m
🤣3🔥1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@banderafella: “Joined in” was the only accurate feature
“Based in” can be changed by VPNs and many accounts won’t be using social media without a VPN
There are problems with “Connected Via” as anyone can use any App Store. While “Joined In” they weren’t think about when they made the account
@banderafella: “Joined in” was the only accurate feature
“Based in” can be changed by VPNs and many accounts won’t be using social media without a VPN
There are problems with “Connected Via” as anyone can use any App Store. While “Joined In” they weren’t think about when they made the account
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
More drones attack the territory around the Shaturskaya TPP, Moscow region, in the morning https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1992496712003538973#m
More drones attack the territory around the Shaturskaya TPP, Moscow region, in the morning https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1992496712003538973#m
🔥1