IgorGirkin (Twitter)

RT @NatashaBertrand: SecDef HEGSETH just now at the Ukraine Defense Contact Group: "The United States does not believe that NATO membership for Ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement."

IgorGirkin (Twitter)

UAF drone-interceptor in action

Status-6 (Twitter)

RT @paulmcleary: NEW: UK Defense Minister Healey says in Brussels Ukraine meeting that US @SecDef "confirmed to me this morning, the US continued commitment and involvement" in the Ukraine Defense Contact Group.

Status-6 (Twitter)

RT @LucasFoxNews: Defense Secretary Hegseth, speaking at Nato hq in Brussels, says “stark strategic realities prevent the United States from being the primary guarantor of security in Europe,” says U.S. forces must focus on China and Europe must step up defense spending.

Colby Badhwar 🇨🇦🇬🇧 (Twitter)

🇺🇸🇺🇦 Ukraine has a new PATRIOT communications system from the US Army

Details linked below @ArchivesDefense ⬇️

Necro Mancer (Twitter)

RT @bodmiruk: 115 днів мій підрозділ безпосередньо виконує бойові завдання майже без додаткової грошової винагороди (лише за з.п. 22-26тис. грн/міс.)
Бійці моєї в.ч. «премію» отримали за цей час лише за період 20 днів, коли були в підпорядкуванні одної з 4х бригад в складі яких ми працювали.👇

Necro Mancer (Twitter)

RT @206_110: @gilead_soldier: Нормальний, але в мене порвався коли накладав, на фото чекаю закінчення обстрілу, а очі досі охуєвші, коли тільки перестало кров пиздувать з артерії, і тут вороттк в руках лишився)))

‌Status-6 (Twitter)

RT @JenGriffinFNC: Hegseth to NATO: “These security guarantees (for Ukraine) should NOT be provided through NATO membership, but must 
instead be backed by capable European and non-European troops. If these troops are deployed as peacekeepers to Ukraine at any point, they should be deployed as part of a non-NATO mission and not covered under Article 5. (An attack on one is an attack on all.) There also must be robust international oversight of the line of contact.

To be clear, as part of any security guarantee, there will NOT be U.S. troops deployed to Ukraine.”

‌Status-6 (Twitter)

RT @JenGriffinFNC: Hegseth to NATO: “The U.S. is prioritizing deterring war with China in the Pacific, 
recognizing the reality of scarcity, and making the resourcing tradeoffs to ensure deterrence does not fail. 
As the United States shifts its attention to these threats, 
European allies must lead from the front. 
Together, we can establish a division of labor that maximizes our comparative advantages in Europe and the Pacific respectively.”

‌The Lookout (Twitter)

While unpopular, these two quotes are the most uncontroversial of Hegseth's statement.

Reaching pre 2014 borders has been unlikely for quite some time.

US troops on the ground and NATO membership for Ukraine was off the table with the previous admin too.

The rest of what he said, IMO, points towards significant consequences, both for Ukraine and Europe as a whole.

The Lookout (Twitter)

@shashj: To me, his statement implies that the US footprint in Europe will shrink.

A transcript would be useful, so going by memory here, but think he said something like "Europe must manage conventionally on their own".

Not sure if they have thought about things like SACEUR yet.