Twitter и TikTok
7.43K subscribers
247K photos
73.3K videos
19 files
279K links
Стриминг твитов о российско-украинской войне в ТГ; иногда сообщения также постятся и редактируются вручную
Download Telegram
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Lookout (Twitter)

Just an initial impression:

This doesn't look like something with any significant amounts of explosives impacting, and it doesn't look like normal RV's either. https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1859533578599575629#m
🤬4❤‍🔥1👍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Status-6 (Twitter)

Better footage of the alleged impacts of multiple warheads separated from a Russian ICBM in Dnipro earlier today. https://twitter.com/Archer83Able/status/1859531912345235564#m
❤‍🔥1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dan (Twitter)

RT @The_Lookout_N: Just an initial impression:

This doesn't look like something with any significant amounts of explosives impacting, and it doesn't look like normal RV's either. https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1859533578599575629#m
Dan (Twitter)

RT @shashj: I would be inclined to put more weight on American assessments over the Ukrainian ones in this particular instance. The US had forewarning, it would have been watching the Kapustin Yar facility very closely & would have seen detailed signs of launch & trajectory.
👍1
The Lookout (Twitter)

RT @russianforces: Regarding reports about ICBM fired by Russia to Dnipro. My take is that one must be skeptical and cautious. Regarding the "intercontinental" claim, the distance from Kapustin Yar to Dnipro is about 800 km. It's not an intercontinental range. But it's complicated. Short thread 1/
The Lookout (Twitter)

RT @russianforces: I would urge people to keep calm, not assume automatically that "intercontinental" is something inherently and immediately dangerous. But it should be taken seriously. Everyone should be cautious about making claims or sending and interpreting signals. 6/6
👍1
Dan (Twitter)

RT @RealCynicalFox: @EsotericCD @ElbridgeColby: This is a point I thoroughly disagree with. A revanchist Russia was always going to conduct local aggressive actions against unaligned states on its borders to “recover” territory. The only way to stop that was with the threat of force. There’s a reason Russia invaded Ukraine, not the Baltics who enjoy the protection of NATO.

There were only three options; bring Ukraine into NATO before Russia was ready to take military action l, fight a proxy war when Ukraine was invaded, or let the Russians conduct local aggressions. We chose the worst combination of the latter two options.
👍1
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)

The fragment of Russian ICBM which was used to track the city of Dnipro this morning.
t.me/war_home/3139 https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1859533578599575629#m
👍1
Status-6 (Twitter)

A Western official told ABC News that today's Russian strike on Dnipro did not appear to be conducted with an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), but rather a shorter-range ballistic missile of some kind.

https://abcnews.go.com/International/ukraine-russia-icbm-launch-intercontinental-ballistic-missile/story?id=116085317
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
IgorGirkin (Twitter)

Марию Захарову прямо во время брифинга попросили не комментировать информацию о якобы применении Россией межконтинентальной баллистической ракеты против Украины. @ejdailyru
😁10🍌2