Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
Destroyed Russian AFV column on the Kreminna front. Russian losses of 1xT-72, 4xBMP-2, 1xBMP-3, 1xBTR-82 shown on the video.
t.me/brigade95/918
Destroyed Russian AFV column on the Kreminna front. Russian losses of 1xT-72, 4xBMP-2, 1xBMP-3, 1xBTR-82 shown on the video.
t.me/brigade95/918
🔥7👏1
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
"This is a warhead of yesterday's 3M22 missile. As long as a Shahed-136 warhead, weighing no more than 200kg, of which 80 kg of explosives."
t.me/war_home/911 https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1772228253006078337#m
"This is a warhead of yesterday's 3M22 missile. As long as a Shahed-136 warhead, weighing no more than 200kg, of which 80 kg of explosives."
t.me/war_home/911 https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1772228253006078337#m
Def Mon (Twitter)
RT @typesfast: Me remembering the last time I thought about the Port of Baltimore this much...
RT @typesfast: Me remembering the last time I thought about the Port of Baltimore this much...
🤗2
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@autunite1878 @deez_nuts_news: If you actually look at the missile launch at the initial one, you can see that there is no scramjet there. Russia has claimed to be making a “hypersonic missile” but we have not seen any evidence that it is actually a hypersonic missile, what it appears to be now is a ballistic missile that is launched from a ship. Which is what Ukraine claimed it to be, Ukraine did claim to shot down ballistic missiles down usually they specific either Iskander-M, Kinzhal, or KN-23 but this time they did not because they are clarifying details, which is why the outlet Defense UA has published photos of the same missiles that were shot down and clarified it as being a 3M22 Zircon. There appears to also
Defense UA, an outlet in Ukraine linked to the Ukrainian armed forces, stated this is the second usage of the Zircon missile. There is no evidence of a Scram Jet.
You need will to show some proof that it’s there. This was the second time the missile was used, the one back in February also had the number 3M22 on it, and was shot down, and they were able to construct it and make a mock design of how it looks. So that photo is showing you how the missile is supposed to look without being destroyed.
You don’t know what all the parts are better than the people actually reconstructing the missile on the ground, and neither do you know where the Scram Jet is or if there even is one. The best evidence we have of this is the diagram of the reconstructed missile. And after looking at the video of the launch of this missile today from the Russian ship, it looks the same as what Russia claims is a Zircon.
According to Defense UA, there were only a few fragments from the Zircon shot down in February and it took them five days to reconstruct the missile to verify that it was a Zircon. Part of the reason is how the Patriot PAC-3 directly impacts the missile. It’s a kinetic warhead, and it breaks a lot of fragments into pieces, depending on how it hits the missile.
As of today, there is not a single photo of the Zircon missile, only low quality photos of the launch released by Russia, zero evidence of any Scram Jet has ever been released. Also, it does appear that there is a warhead, and it hit a building and made a hole in the building, and the warhead is laying visibly through the hole in other photos that I posted. But both me and you can be wrong about that because we have never even seen a missile in real life, your guess as good as good as mine. We’re basically both assuming which part is what because we are not there on the ground examining the missile and we have never seen it in real life only what Russia aspired it to be in a 3D diagram years ago. Also, if the Zircon missiles hit something, I would like to see some evidence of exactly what they hit via satellite images or any other reports with evidence.
@autunite1878 @deez_nuts_news: If you actually look at the missile launch at the initial one, you can see that there is no scramjet there. Russia has claimed to be making a “hypersonic missile” but we have not seen any evidence that it is actually a hypersonic missile, what it appears to be now is a ballistic missile that is launched from a ship. Which is what Ukraine claimed it to be, Ukraine did claim to shot down ballistic missiles down usually they specific either Iskander-M, Kinzhal, or KN-23 but this time they did not because they are clarifying details, which is why the outlet Defense UA has published photos of the same missiles that were shot down and clarified it as being a 3M22 Zircon. There appears to also
Defense UA, an outlet in Ukraine linked to the Ukrainian armed forces, stated this is the second usage of the Zircon missile. There is no evidence of a Scram Jet.
You need will to show some proof that it’s there. This was the second time the missile was used, the one back in February also had the number 3M22 on it, and was shot down, and they were able to construct it and make a mock design of how it looks. So that photo is showing you how the missile is supposed to look without being destroyed.
You don’t know what all the parts are better than the people actually reconstructing the missile on the ground, and neither do you know where the Scram Jet is or if there even is one. The best evidence we have of this is the diagram of the reconstructed missile. And after looking at the video of the launch of this missile today from the Russian ship, it looks the same as what Russia claims is a Zircon.
According to Defense UA, there were only a few fragments from the Zircon shot down in February and it took them five days to reconstruct the missile to verify that it was a Zircon. Part of the reason is how the Patriot PAC-3 directly impacts the missile. It’s a kinetic warhead, and it breaks a lot of fragments into pieces, depending on how it hits the missile.
As of today, there is not a single photo of the Zircon missile, only low quality photos of the launch released by Russia, zero evidence of any Scram Jet has ever been released. Also, it does appear that there is a warhead, and it hit a building and made a hole in the building, and the warhead is laying visibly through the hole in other photos that I posted. But both me and you can be wrong about that because we have never even seen a missile in real life, your guess as good as good as mine. We’re basically both assuming which part is what because we are not there on the ground examining the missile and we have never seen it in real life only what Russia aspired it to be in a 3D diagram years ago. Also, if the Zircon missiles hit something, I would like to see some evidence of exactly what they hit via satellite images or any other reports with evidence.
👍2
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@21aar_show: You’re absolutely correct, there are some places that have absolutely no defense, Actually most of the country probably has no defense, but they’re probably not valuable targets.
I’m saying that probably Ukraine intercepted like 70% of all the cruise and ballistic missile country wide attack that are happening now and before that are towards the cities. But they may have not intercepted almost any Iskander-M, Cruise Missiles like Kh-59, and Tornado-S and other going towards the front line which are used everyday. So I think it should be divided up into two parts, the country wide attacks, and then the attacks on the front line. Then the countrywide attacks could be divided up into the cities to see their interception rates.
@21aar_show: You’re absolutely correct, there are some places that have absolutely no defense, Actually most of the country probably has no defense, but they’re probably not valuable targets.
I’m saying that probably Ukraine intercepted like 70% of all the cruise and ballistic missile country wide attack that are happening now and before that are towards the cities. But they may have not intercepted almost any Iskander-M, Cruise Missiles like Kh-59, and Tornado-S and other going towards the front line which are used everyday. So I think it should be divided up into two parts, the country wide attacks, and then the attacks on the front line. Then the countrywide attacks could be divided up into the cities to see their interception rates.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
RT @JeremyFowkes: @squatsons: “Military Target”
You will cry and sob and write essays for three days straight when this happens to the border cities of Russia.
RT @JeremyFowkes: @squatsons: “Military Target”
You will cry and sob and write essays for three days straight when this happens to the border cities of Russia.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
RT @UnderNeander: @Kingstyler88 @JeremyFowkes @ukraine_map @squatsons: And the Russians drop their bombs exactly where they intend to
RT @UnderNeander: @Kingstyler88 @JeremyFowkes @ukraine_map @squatsons: And the Russians drop their bombs exactly where they intend to
😢2👍1🐳1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
The Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland in USA 🇺🇸 was hit by a large container ship causing it to fully colllapse. More than a dozen cars are in the water
The Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland in USA 🇺🇸 was hit by a large container ship causing it to fully colllapse. More than a dozen cars are in the water
😢8😁1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
Ukraine 🇺🇦 shot down all 12 Shahed Kamikaze Drones launched by Russia at the country throughout the night
12/12 or (100%) of Shahed Drones
If you want more detailed daily Shahed tracking follow @ShahedTracker
Ukraine 🇺🇦 shot down all 12 Shahed Kamikaze Drones launched by Russia at the country throughout the night
12/12 or (100%) of Shahed Drones
If you want more detailed daily Shahed tracking follow @ShahedTracker
👍1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@casualdiot: I am still trying to figure out how that ended up happening, what the Captain and Ship Crew were thinking.
@casualdiot: I am still trying to figure out how that ended up happening, what the Captain and Ship Crew were thinking.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
Ukraine 🇺🇦 reports striking the landing ship Kostyantyn Olshansky with a Neptune Anti-Ship Missile. The damage is being assessed, according to the Ukrainian Navy Spokesman
Ukraine 🇺🇦 reports striking the landing ship Kostyantyn Olshansky with a Neptune Anti-Ship Missile. The damage is being assessed, according to the Ukrainian Navy Spokesman
🔥7👍1🤔1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@OAlexanderDK: If this happened in Russia, they would blame Ukraine for it
@OAlexanderDK: If this happened in Russia, they would blame Ukraine for it
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@USNATO: So stop being weak and give the weapons Ukraine 🇺🇦 needs to defeat Russia and win the war
Too many words and no actions while Russia is bombing all of Ukraine daily and destroying civilian infrastructure. History will judge your inaction and weakness very harshly
@USNATO: So stop being weak and give the weapons Ukraine 🇺🇦 needs to defeat Russia and win the war
Too many words and no actions while Russia is bombing all of Ukraine daily and destroying civilian infrastructure. History will judge your inaction and weakness very harshly
👍2😁1😢1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@oftenwrongsorry @randymot4 @USNATO: I do not agree that Trump will be any better for Ukraine, actually Ukraine’s future maybe very uncertain and dark if he is elected as President.
@oftenwrongsorry @randymot4 @USNATO: I do not agree that Trump will be any better for Ukraine, actually Ukraine’s future maybe very uncertain and dark if he is elected as President.
😢1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
Ukraine 🇺🇦 hit Ivan Khurs, the Russian Reconnaissance Black Sea Fleet Ship in Sevastopol with a Storm Shadow, SCALP-EG Cruise Missile in this week’s strike, according to sattelite images
Ukraine 🇺🇦 hit Ivan Khurs, the Russian Reconnaissance Black Sea Fleet Ship in Sevastopol with a Storm Shadow, SCALP-EG Cruise Missile in this week’s strike, according to sattelite images
🔥12😱1