Status-6 (Twitter)
US President Trump:
"Is it really possible that big progress is being made in Peace Talks between Russia and Ukraine??? Don’t believe it until you see it, but something good just may be happening."
US President Trump:
"Is it really possible that big progress is being made in Peace Talks between Russia and Ukraine??? Don’t believe it until you see it, but something good just may be happening."
🤡2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Lookout (Twitter)
RT @BBCSteveR: In today’s Russian papers there’s scepticism over the current round of diplomacy. One paper: “The European-Ukrainian gang will ‘correct’ Trump’s plan so that it’s unacceptable for Russia.” Another: “I don’t think the Special Military Operation will end this year.” #ReadingRussia
RT @BBCSteveR: In today’s Russian papers there’s scepticism over the current round of diplomacy. One paper: “The European-Ukrainian gang will ‘correct’ Trump’s plan so that it’s unacceptable for Russia.” Another: “I don’t think the Special Military Operation will end this year.” #ReadingRussia
😁1🤡1
Necro Mancer (Twitter)
RT @VasyaMakeevskiy: #Макіївка 13:00 відносно спокійно. арта дуже далеко на заході. авіація. іноді одиночні бахи, далеко в боці Донецька, можливо ППО
RT @VasyaMakeevskiy: #Макіївка 13:00 відносно спокійно. арта дуже далеко на заході. авіація. іноді одиночні бахи, далеко в боці Донецька, можливо ППО
X (formerly Twitter)
Vaska z Makiivki (@VasyaMakeevskiy) on X
#Макіївка 13:00 відносно спокійно. арта дуже далеко на заході. авіація. іноді одиночні бахи, далеко в боці Донецька, можливо ППО
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Necro Mancer (Twitter)
63 секунды на Лиманском направлении, выпуск 23/11/25
t.me/ombr_63/1427 #63омбр #всу https://twitter.com/666_mancer/status/1990469889883062410#m
63 секунды на Лиманском направлении, выпуск 23/11/25
t.me/ombr_63/1427 #63омбр #всу https://twitter.com/666_mancer/status/1990469889883062410#m
🔥3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Status-6 (Twitter)
RT @CITeam_en: Authorities in Yakutia have suspended payments to soldiers fighting in Ukraine due to budgetary constraints; a Ural military truck crash crushed 4 passenger cars near Kursk; the names of 149,241 Russian soldiers killed in Ukraine since the start of the full-scale invasion have now been identified
https://notes.citeam.org/mobi-nov-20-23-2025
RT @CITeam_en: Authorities in Yakutia have suspended payments to soldiers fighting in Ukraine due to budgetary constraints; a Ural military truck crash crushed 4 passenger cars near Kursk; the names of 149,241 Russian soldiers killed in Ukraine since the start of the full-scale invasion have now been identified
https://notes.citeam.org/mobi-nov-20-23-2025
👍3❤1🤯1
Dan (Twitter)
RT @robggill: Ukraine is one of the simplest black and white geo-political conflicts. Many conflicts are not so black and white but it is objectively true that Russia invaded Ukraine in an entirely unprovoked & illegal war of imperial aggression. Anyone who can't see that is immoral.
RT @robggill: Ukraine is one of the simplest black and white geo-political conflicts. Many conflicts are not so black and white but it is objectively true that Russia invaded Ukraine in an entirely unprovoked & illegal war of imperial aggression. Anyone who can't see that is immoral.
💯4
Rob Lee (Twitter)
"Of the original US plan, Yaroslav, in eastern Ukraine, says it 'sucks... no one will support it' while an army medic with the call sign Shtutser dismissed it as an 'absolutely disgraceful draft of a peace plan, unworthy of our attention'.
But one soldier with the call sign Snake told us 'it's time to agree at least on something'...
'Let them take it,' Snake told the BBC. 'There's practically no one left in the cities and villages... We're not fighting for the people but for the land, while losing more people.'
Andrii, an officer in Ukraine's general staff, says that what is being proposed for Luhansk and Donetsk is 'painful and difficult' but he suggests the country may have no other choice.
Ukraine has been defending the region since 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea and its proxy forces seized parts of the Donbas. 'We may not want to give it up, but we won't be able to hold it by military force and resources,' Andrii says...
Matros, who has been...
Перейти на оригинальный пост
"Of the original US plan, Yaroslav, in eastern Ukraine, says it 'sucks... no one will support it' while an army medic with the call sign Shtutser dismissed it as an 'absolutely disgraceful draft of a peace plan, unworthy of our attention'.
But one soldier with the call sign Snake told us 'it's time to agree at least on something'...
'Let them take it,' Snake told the BBC. 'There's practically no one left in the cities and villages... We're not fighting for the people but for the land, while losing more people.'
Andrii, an officer in Ukraine's general staff, says that what is being proposed for Luhansk and Donetsk is 'painful and difficult' but he suggests the country may have no other choice.
Ukraine has been defending the region since 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea and its proxy forces seized parts of the Donbas. 'We may not want to give it up, but we won't be able to hold it by military force and resources,' Andrii says...
Matros, who has been...
Перейти на оригинальный пост
❤1
😁3❤1🤡1
The Lookout (Twitter)
RT @RALee85: "Of the original US plan, Yaroslav, in eastern Ukraine, says it 'sucks... no one will support it' while an army medic with the call sign Shtutser dismissed it as an 'absolutely disgraceful draft of a peace plan, unworthy of our attention'.
But one soldier with the call sign Snake told us 'it's time to agree at least on something'...
'Let them take it,' Snake told the BBC. 'There's practically no one left in the cities and villages... We're not fighting for the people but for the land, while losing more people.'
Andrii, an officer in Ukraine's general staff, says that what is being proposed for Luhansk and Donetsk is 'painful and difficult' but he suggests the country may have no other choice.
Ukraine has been defending the region since 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea and its proxy forces seized parts of the Donbas. 'We may not want to give it up, but we won't be able to hold it by military force and resources,' Andrii says...
Matros,...
Перейти на оригинальный пост
RT @RALee85: "Of the original US plan, Yaroslav, in eastern Ukraine, says it 'sucks... no one will support it' while an army medic with the call sign Shtutser dismissed it as an 'absolutely disgraceful draft of a peace plan, unworthy of our attention'.
But one soldier with the call sign Snake told us 'it's time to agree at least on something'...
'Let them take it,' Snake told the BBC. 'There's practically no one left in the cities and villages... We're not fighting for the people but for the land, while losing more people.'
Andrii, an officer in Ukraine's general staff, says that what is being proposed for Luhansk and Donetsk is 'painful and difficult' but he suggests the country may have no other choice.
Ukraine has been defending the region since 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea and its proxy forces seized parts of the Donbas. 'We may not want to give it up, but we won't be able to hold it by military force and resources,' Andrii says...
Matros,...
Перейти на оригинальный пост
🤡1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@JohnPlayerSpezi @PhilipIngMBE: That was a handful of outlets and journalists who aren’t the most experienced at analyzing war. At the time Russia’s total missile stockpile was a couple hundred missiles because they used a significant amount of missiles in the first 2-3 months of the invasion. In 9 months, Russia launched 830 Iskander-M ballistic missiles, most were used in the first 3 months of the invasion. That’s over 100 ballistic missiles per month, Russia sues no where near that now. Russia launched over 3,000 cruise missiles and ballistic missiles in the first 9 months of the invasion. That’s 340 missiles per month, or over 500 some months, a rate Russia never sustained consistently later in the war.
Russia would’ve needed the largest advanced cruise and ballistic missile stockpile at the world to continue sustaining that, and it makes sense why for multiple months later they fired no cruise or ballistic missiles while their production ramped up and they saved up for attacks.
Russia then scaled up production. You can run out of money today, and go work and save up the next two years, and you will have a lot more money.
People think of running out or being low on weapons is irreversible but that’s not how it works in warfare. I did a chart showing how many missiles Russia was estimated to have, and that number never went below 0, because once they got close, they’d fire less. At once point in 2023 they didn’t fire any cruise missiles for 2-3 months after launching a several hundreds at Ukraine in the winter of 2022-2023. Then once their stockpile increased, they’d fire more.
Running low on cruise and ballistic missiles earlier in the war, didn’t mean Russia couldn’t increase its production rate of missiles later in the war, and it’s what they did. It’s understandable, Russia wasn’t planning on a multi-year war in early 2022, and as a result needed to increase production not just of missiles but of most other types of equipment and ammunition.
@JohnPlayerSpezi @PhilipIngMBE: That was a handful of outlets and journalists who aren’t the most experienced at analyzing war. At the time Russia’s total missile stockpile was a couple hundred missiles because they used a significant amount of missiles in the first 2-3 months of the invasion. In 9 months, Russia launched 830 Iskander-M ballistic missiles, most were used in the first 3 months of the invasion. That’s over 100 ballistic missiles per month, Russia sues no where near that now. Russia launched over 3,000 cruise missiles and ballistic missiles in the first 9 months of the invasion. That’s 340 missiles per month, or over 500 some months, a rate Russia never sustained consistently later in the war.
Russia would’ve needed the largest advanced cruise and ballistic missile stockpile at the world to continue sustaining that, and it makes sense why for multiple months later they fired no cruise or ballistic missiles while their production ramped up and they saved up for attacks.
Russia then scaled up production. You can run out of money today, and go work and save up the next two years, and you will have a lot more money.
People think of running out or being low on weapons is irreversible but that’s not how it works in warfare. I did a chart showing how many missiles Russia was estimated to have, and that number never went below 0, because once they got close, they’d fire less. At once point in 2023 they didn’t fire any cruise missiles for 2-3 months after launching a several hundreds at Ukraine in the winter of 2022-2023. Then once their stockpile increased, they’d fire more.
Running low on cruise and ballistic missiles earlier in the war, didn’t mean Russia couldn’t increase its production rate of missiles later in the war, and it’s what they did. It’s understandable, Russia wasn’t planning on a multi-year war in early 2022, and as a result needed to increase production not just of missiles but of most other types of equipment and ammunition.
The Lookout (Twitter)
.@Black_BirdGroup and @J_JHelin with an article on the US peace initiative well worth reading.
Morals or ideas of justice don't influence the outcome of the war, hard power and the balance in the war will, regardless of how much one despises this.
Link in the next post.
.@Black_BirdGroup and @J_JHelin with an article on the US peace initiative well worth reading.
Morals or ideas of justice don't influence the outcome of the war, hard power and the balance in the war will, regardless of how much one despises this.
Link in the next post.
The Lookout (Twitter)
@KohseSoren @Black_BirdGroup @J_JHelin: Regardless of how the current round ends, I would treat it as a pause, rather than the final end of it all.
Still, I find it very hard to envisage an outcome truly beneficial to Ukraine without a major shift in the European approach, even then it's not given, and I don't see any indications of such a shift coming.
@KohseSoren @Black_BirdGroup @J_JHelin: Regardless of how the current round ends, I would treat it as a pause, rather than the final end of it all.
Still, I find it very hard to envisage an outcome truly beneficial to Ukraine without a major shift in the European approach, even then it's not given, and I don't see any indications of such a shift coming.