IgorGirkin (Twitter)
"На командних пунктах заслухав командувача оперативного-тактичного угруповання "Донецьк" бригадного генерала Олександра Тарнавського та командирів бригад щодо ведення бойових дій, наявних потреб і проблемних питань на Новопавлівському напрямку"
"На командних пунктах заслухав командувача оперативного-тактичного угруповання "Донецьк" бригадного генерала Олександра Тарнавського та командирів бригад щодо ведення бойових дій, наявних потреб і проблемних питань на Новопавлівському напрямку"
❤1
IgorGirkin (Twitter)
@frosiechka: Якщо немає перешкод (РЕБ) вони лягають влучно. У будівлі був військовий об'єкт? Якщо ні, то до чого розмова про влучність?
@frosiechka: Якщо немає перешкод (РЕБ) вони лягають влучно. У будівлі був військовий об'єкт? Якщо ні, то до чого розмова про влучність?
Necro Mancer (Twitter)
@fish20069: Ну так они ж рассчитывают, что Трамп им Запор и Херсон без боёв на блюдечке с голубой каёмочкой принесёт
@fish20069: Ну так они ж рассчитывают, что Трамп им Запор и Херсон без боёв на блюдечке с голубой каёмочкой принесёт
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
Russians on a completely roofless UAZ ‘Bukhanka’, tried to attack Ukrainian positions.
The contrast is interesting: on the one hand, Russians try to weld as much metal, cages, nets, wood and other junk onto one vehicle as possible, while at the same time cutting off roofs, doors, etc. from other vehicles.
In the first case, it is assumed that such improvised protection should protect the vehicle from the FPV strike.
On the other hand, it is believed that after the detonation of the drone, this improvised protection, as well as the body of the vehicle itself, on the contrary, prevents the crew from leaving the vehicle in time, blocks the view, and can cause greater harm to the crew in the event of a strike by the FPV.
Russians on a completely roofless UAZ ‘Bukhanka’, tried to attack Ukrainian positions.
The contrast is interesting: on the one hand, Russians try to weld as much metal, cages, nets, wood and other junk onto one vehicle as possible, while at the same time cutting off roofs, doors, etc. from other vehicles.
In the first case, it is assumed that such improvised protection should protect the vehicle from the FPV strike.
On the other hand, it is believed that after the detonation of the drone, this improvised protection, as well as the body of the vehicle itself, on the contrary, prevents the crew from leaving the vehicle in time, blocks the view, and can cause greater harm to the crew in the event of a strike by the FPV.
🔥4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
Results of the hunt for Russian drones by the 3rd Assault Brigade in just 1 month: Orlan – 4; Molniya – 12; Privet – 2; Lancet – 5; Supercam– 7; Zala – 6. t.me/ab3army/5290
Results of the hunt for Russian drones by the 3rd Assault Brigade in just 1 month: Orlan – 4; Molniya – 12; Privet – 2; Lancet – 5; Supercam– 7; Zala – 6. t.me/ab3army/5290
🔥6
Necro Mancer (Twitter)
4-19: бойцы #252мсп благодарят за гуманитарную помощь;
4-20: помощь не доехала до расположения и уже не доедет, 5 бойцов и помощь сгорели
#всрф #потерьнет
4-19: бойцы #252мсп благодарят за гуманитарную помощь;
4-20: помощь не доехала до расположения и уже не доедет, 5 бойцов и помощь сгорели
#всрф #потерьнет
🔥10😍1🤝1
The Lookout (Twitter)
RT @AlexLuck9: Some problematic claims in this piece which IMO misrepresent both historical events and the current operational reality for RAN & PLAN. Short🧵:
RT @AlexLuck9: Some problematic claims in this piece which IMO misrepresent both historical events and the current operational reality for RAN & PLAN. Short🧵:
Thediplomat
A Shot Across the Bow: China Signals New Era of Sea Power in the Southwest Pacific
The live-fire exercises were a demonstration of China’s growing sea power in Australia and New Zealand’s immediate periphery – and meant to normalize the PLA presence there.
The Lookout (Twitter)
@exit266: .@InaHPKvam has given some good answers but a few from me too.
The reconstitution debate is about when Russia represents a credible threat to someone again and scenarios and timelines vary.
In main, the Russian Navy in general and Northern- and Baltic Fleets in particular, doesn't need any reconstitution time to represent a threat. Ship availability is rather good actually and there are indications that BALFLT is preparing for possible confrontation now.
One exception, which goes to my initial point, is Kalibr missile stocks. The other is that a good portion of NORFLT and BALFLT amphibious capability is locked up in the Black Sea. I think that the Turks won't change Montreaux practice until they are confident a ceasefire will hold.
That the Black Sea Fleet underperformed doesn't mean that we should underestimate the Russian Navy in general. While NATO in general has an overmatch, this doesn't mean things won't get hard and bloody, especially for us frontline countries.
Another important point: Today's worst case scenario means going up against them without direct US involvement.
@exit266: .@InaHPKvam has given some good answers but a few from me too.
The reconstitution debate is about when Russia represents a credible threat to someone again and scenarios and timelines vary.
In main, the Russian Navy in general and Northern- and Baltic Fleets in particular, doesn't need any reconstitution time to represent a threat. Ship availability is rather good actually and there are indications that BALFLT is preparing for possible confrontation now.
One exception, which goes to my initial point, is Kalibr missile stocks. The other is that a good portion of NORFLT and BALFLT amphibious capability is locked up in the Black Sea. I think that the Turks won't change Montreaux practice until they are confident a ceasefire will hold.
That the Black Sea Fleet underperformed doesn't mean that we should underestimate the Russian Navy in general. While NATO in general has an overmatch, this doesn't mean things won't get hard and bloody, especially for us frontline countries.
Another important point: Today's worst case scenario means going up against them without direct US involvement.