Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@RosChappell @covid8802 @khodorkovsky_en The only problem with that is, Europe does not have the ability to step up enough aid for Ukraine to win the war or even maintain strong defenses. Only US can do that.
@RosChappell @covid8802 @khodorkovsky_en The only problem with that is, Europe does not have the ability to step up enough aid for Ukraine to win the war or even maintain strong defenses. Only US can do that.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@Lion_King_Fella @khodorkovsky_en You are 100% correct, however it will be much more costly in terms of soldiers dying. Those lines are extremely fortified, Donetsk and Luhansk city are going to be very hard to take back. But it is certainly possible to take them back if Europe and US are willing to send the aid.
@Lion_King_Fella @khodorkovsky_en You are 100% correct, however it will be much more costly in terms of soldiers dying. Those lines are extremely fortified, Donetsk and Luhansk city are going to be very hard to take back. But it is certainly possible to take them back if Europe and US are willing to send the aid.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
It’s a much more different geography for battle. In Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, a land bridge can be split in half, destroying logistics. Then, in Crimea, the Kerch Bridge could be destroyed, making it fully isolated like an island, eventually leading to the collapse/siege of Russian forces there. The north of Luhansk primarily has fields and a much smaller population, making it easier to take back after breaking through the lines.
However, Donetsk and South Luhansk Oblasts are very dense cities that have been fortified well since 2014, they are also directly connected to Russia via land, there is no land bridge to break or bridge to destroy to isolate them, plus there is a long river through the North part of it near the city of Luhansk.
There is a reason Ukraine has not been able to take back land in the area that was taken there since 2014 because it is incredibly costly, and it has been infiltrated with collaborators much more than the other areas. Maybe economically pressuring Russia would get those lands back at a lesser price than lives. After all, it is only 2.8% of the country's land and could cause more problems like terrorist attacks than good.
It’s a much more different geography for battle. In Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, a land bridge can be split in half, destroying logistics. Then, in Crimea, the Kerch Bridge could be destroyed, making it fully isolated like an island, eventually leading to the collapse/siege of Russian forces there. The north of Luhansk primarily has fields and a much smaller population, making it easier to take back after breaking through the lines.
However, Donetsk and South Luhansk Oblasts are very dense cities that have been fortified well since 2014, they are also directly connected to Russia via land, there is no land bridge to break or bridge to destroy to isolate them, plus there is a long river through the North part of it near the city of Luhansk.
There is a reason Ukraine has not been able to take back land in the area that was taken there since 2014 because it is incredibly costly, and it has been infiltrated with collaborators much more than the other areas. Maybe economically pressuring Russia would get those lands back at a lesser price than lives. After all, it is only 2.8% of the country's land and could cause more problems like terrorist attacks than good.
👎1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
It’s a much more difficult geography for battle. In Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, a land bridge can be split in half, destroying logistics. Then, in Crimea, the Kerch Bridge could be destroyed, making it fully isolated like an island, eventually leading to the collapse/siege of Russian forces there. The north of Luhansk primarily has fields and a much smaller population, making it easier to take back after breaking through the lines.
However, Donetsk and South Luhansk Oblasts are very dense cities that have been fortified well since 2014, they are also directly connected to Russia via land, there is no land bridge to break or bridge to destroy to isolate them, plus there is a long river through the North part of it near the city of Luhansk.
There is a reason Ukraine has not been able to take back land in the area that was taken there since 2014 because it is incredibly costly, and it has been infiltrated with collaborators much more than the other areas. Maybe economically pressuring Russia would get those lands back at a lesser price than lives. After all, it is only 2.8% of the country's land and could cause more problems like terrorist attacks than good.
It would be rewarding Putin by giving him any territory, but the costs in terms of human lives are in credible high. Ukraine would rather in in NATO with 97% of the country including all of Crimea (by that time the Putin regime may collapse), then spending several hundred thousands more lives to take 2.8% of the country that has been infiltrated with Russian collaborators since 2014. The only way to actually take that land without going on a suicide mission but also taking serious losses would be if the lines are weakened to go around the region by entering deep into Russia then turning South and taking territory toward Rostov-on-Don then holding that and doing a siege of the territory for months. The hope now is to take all of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Crimea, and parts of Donetsk and Luhansk, then by that time have Russsia surrender that territory entirely due many different factors, but if they do not then militarily taking it is something that will even further cause mass casualties amongst Ukrainians.
It’s a much more difficult geography for battle. In Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, a land bridge can be split in half, destroying logistics. Then, in Crimea, the Kerch Bridge could be destroyed, making it fully isolated like an island, eventually leading to the collapse/siege of Russian forces there. The north of Luhansk primarily has fields and a much smaller population, making it easier to take back after breaking through the lines.
However, Donetsk and South Luhansk Oblasts are very dense cities that have been fortified well since 2014, they are also directly connected to Russia via land, there is no land bridge to break or bridge to destroy to isolate them, plus there is a long river through the North part of it near the city of Luhansk.
There is a reason Ukraine has not been able to take back land in the area that was taken there since 2014 because it is incredibly costly, and it has been infiltrated with collaborators much more than the other areas. Maybe economically pressuring Russia would get those lands back at a lesser price than lives. After all, it is only 2.8% of the country's land and could cause more problems like terrorist attacks than good.
It would be rewarding Putin by giving him any territory, but the costs in terms of human lives are in credible high. Ukraine would rather in in NATO with 97% of the country including all of Crimea (by that time the Putin regime may collapse), then spending several hundred thousands more lives to take 2.8% of the country that has been infiltrated with Russian collaborators since 2014. The only way to actually take that land without going on a suicide mission but also taking serious losses would be if the lines are weakened to go around the region by entering deep into Russia then turning South and taking territory toward Rostov-on-Don then holding that and doing a siege of the territory for months. The hope now is to take all of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Crimea, and parts of Donetsk and Luhansk, then by that time have Russsia surrender that territory entirely due many different factors, but if they do not then militarily taking it is something that will even further cause mass casualties amongst Ukrainians.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@GabeZZOZZ You’ve been saying this for 2 years, all you do is focus on Ukraine, you are Russian propagandist.
@GabeZZOZZ You’ve been saying this for 2 years, all you do is focus on Ukraine, you are Russian propagandist.
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
Ukrainian Yak-52, which is used to counter Russian reconnaissance drones.
Photo from a Russian Zala reconnaissance drone published by Russians.
Ukrainian Yak-52, which is used to counter Russian reconnaissance drones.
Photo from a Russian Zala reconnaissance drone published by Russians.
🔥11👍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
HIMARS strike on the Russian Zala reconnaissance drone and Lancet loitering munition crews.
https://t.co/wvIRABARSq
HIMARS strike on the Russian Zala reconnaissance drone and Lancet loitering munition crews.
https://t.co/wvIRABARSq
🔥13⚡1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Necro Mancer (Twitter)
Херсонская обл., левый берег Днепра: вот так вместо одного нормального прилёта ракеты приходится заниматься дронодрочевом
https://t.co/97TQDYFu6x #RussianUkrainianWar
Херсонская обл., левый берег Днепра: вот так вместо одного нормального прилёта ракеты приходится заниматься дронодрочевом
https://t.co/97TQDYFu6x #RussianUkrainianWar
Necro Mancer (Twitter)
Цейлонско-путинский наёмник Мырусские Снамибог из Шри-Ланки 15/05/24 попал под дрон и с уважением денацифицировался
https://t.co/hBdIHQfcKs #всрф #роа #груз200 #понаехали
Цейлонско-путинский наёмник Мырусские Снамибог из Шри-Ланки 15/05/24 попал под дрон и с уважением денацифицировался
https://t.co/hBdIHQfcKs #всрф #роа #груз200 #понаехали
👍10🍾1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@GabeZZOZZ He tweets about Ukraine over 750 times per month on average and says people will forget about Ukraine 🇺🇦
How ironic 🤡
@GabeZZOZZ He tweets about Ukraine over 750 times per month on average and says people will forget about Ukraine 🇺🇦
How ironic 🤡
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@GabeZZOZZ You’re an American with no connection to Ukraine and the only thing you do is tweet about Ukraine. Since “February 2022” when you created your account. Very strange that you dedicate your life to it since the invasion, isn’t it. Almost like you work for the Russians
@GabeZZOZZ You’re an American with no connection to Ukraine and the only thing you do is tweet about Ukraine. Since “February 2022” when you created your account. Very strange that you dedicate your life to it since the invasion, isn’t it. Almost like you work for the Russians
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
Destruction of the Russian BM-21 Grad MLRS with a big explosion at the end. And FPV attack attempt on a Russian fuel train. By “Ronins” unit.
BM-21 Grad: (47.388305, 35.790241) Zaporizhzhia front.
https://t.co/wwUL2ukp3I
https://t.co/qM6dgexiDl
Destruction of the Russian BM-21 Grad MLRS with a big explosion at the end. And FPV attack attempt on a Russian fuel train. By “Ronins” unit.
BM-21 Grad: (47.388305, 35.790241) Zaporizhzhia front.
https://t.co/wwUL2ukp3I
https://t.co/qM6dgexiDl
👍7👏1