Belarusian Hajun project (Twitter)
Gold, diamonds, oil: the EU extends part of the sanctions imposed against Russia on the regime in Belarus
The EU extended part of the Russian sanctions on the Belarusian economy due to the complicity of the Lukashenka regime in Russia’s war against Ukraine, the EU Council said.
In particular, it imposes a ban on exports of maritime navigation goods and technologies, luxury goods and technologies for use in oil refining and natural gas liquefaction to Belarus.
It’s prohibited to import from Belarus to the EU: gold, diamonds, helium, coal and mineral products, including crude oil.
• Ban on the provision of services
The EU bans the provision of accounting, auditing, tax consulting, architectural, engineering, and IT consulting services, legal advisory, advertising services, etc. to individuals and legal entities linked to the Lukashenka regime.
• Restrictions on the transportation of goods
The EU also extends the ban on transportatio...
Перейти на оригинальный пост
Gold, diamonds, oil: the EU extends part of the sanctions imposed against Russia on the regime in Belarus
The EU extended part of the Russian sanctions on the Belarusian economy due to the complicity of the Lukashenka regime in Russia’s war against Ukraine, the EU Council said.
In particular, it imposes a ban on exports of maritime navigation goods and technologies, luxury goods and technologies for use in oil refining and natural gas liquefaction to Belarus.
It’s prohibited to import from Belarus to the EU: gold, diamonds, helium, coal and mineral products, including crude oil.
• Ban on the provision of services
The EU bans the provision of accounting, auditing, tax consulting, architectural, engineering, and IT consulting services, legal advisory, advertising services, etc. to individuals and legal entities linked to the Lukashenka regime.
• Restrictions on the transportation of goods
The EU also extends the ban on transportatio...
Перейти на оригинальный пост
👍2
Necro Mancer (Twitter)
Настоящий офицер Тарас Шевченко 1993 г.р. из Ярославля находился на СВОВУ с 02/04/22 по 09/06/24. А потом перестал. Наверно, что-то случилось
https://t.co/guhYvdBYTz https://t.co/J4VGZfsTRZ #всрф #потерьнет #груз200
Настоящий офицер Тарас Шевченко 1993 г.р. из Ярославля находился на СВОВУ с 02/04/22 по 09/06/24. А потом перестал. Наверно, что-то случилось
https://t.co/guhYvdBYTz https://t.co/J4VGZfsTRZ #всрф #потерьнет #груз200
🍾13
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Necro Mancer (Twitter)
С приходом ночи наступает тёмное время суток (а рашистам - пиздец)
https://t.co/fCK1s8QKCa #RussianUkrainianWar
С приходом ночи наступает тёмное время суток (а рашистам - пиздец)
https://t.co/fCK1s8QKCa #RussianUkrainianWar
👏6😍1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@khodorkovsky_en Ukraine 🇺🇦 does not need a ceasefire now, they need to get back all their land or at the very minimum all of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Crimea Oblasts, and the parts of Luhansk and Donetsk Oblasts taken since February 24, 2022. Then that leaves >97% of Ukraine under Ukrainian control
@khodorkovsky_en Ukraine 🇺🇦 does not need a ceasefire now, they need to get back all their land or at the very minimum all of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Crimea Oblasts, and the parts of Luhansk and Donetsk Oblasts taken since February 24, 2022. Then that leaves >97% of Ukraine under Ukrainian control
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@RosChappell @covid8802 @khodorkovsky_en The only problem with that is, Europe does not have the ability to step up enough aid for Ukraine to win the war or even maintain strong defenses. Only US can do that.
@RosChappell @covid8802 @khodorkovsky_en The only problem with that is, Europe does not have the ability to step up enough aid for Ukraine to win the war or even maintain strong defenses. Only US can do that.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@Lion_King_Fella @khodorkovsky_en You are 100% correct, however it will be much more costly in terms of soldiers dying. Those lines are extremely fortified, Donetsk and Luhansk city are going to be very hard to take back. But it is certainly possible to take them back if Europe and US are willing to send the aid.
@Lion_King_Fella @khodorkovsky_en You are 100% correct, however it will be much more costly in terms of soldiers dying. Those lines are extremely fortified, Donetsk and Luhansk city are going to be very hard to take back. But it is certainly possible to take them back if Europe and US are willing to send the aid.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
It’s a much more different geography for battle. In Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, a land bridge can be split in half, destroying logistics. Then, in Crimea, the Kerch Bridge could be destroyed, making it fully isolated like an island, eventually leading to the collapse/siege of Russian forces there. The north of Luhansk primarily has fields and a much smaller population, making it easier to take back after breaking through the lines.
However, Donetsk and South Luhansk Oblasts are very dense cities that have been fortified well since 2014, they are also directly connected to Russia via land, there is no land bridge to break or bridge to destroy to isolate them, plus there is a long river through the North part of it near the city of Luhansk.
There is a reason Ukraine has not been able to take back land in the area that was taken there since 2014 because it is incredibly costly, and it has been infiltrated with collaborators much more than the other areas. Maybe economically pressuring Russia would get those lands back at a lesser price than lives. After all, it is only 2.8% of the country's land and could cause more problems like terrorist attacks than good.
It’s a much more different geography for battle. In Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, a land bridge can be split in half, destroying logistics. Then, in Crimea, the Kerch Bridge could be destroyed, making it fully isolated like an island, eventually leading to the collapse/siege of Russian forces there. The north of Luhansk primarily has fields and a much smaller population, making it easier to take back after breaking through the lines.
However, Donetsk and South Luhansk Oblasts are very dense cities that have been fortified well since 2014, they are also directly connected to Russia via land, there is no land bridge to break or bridge to destroy to isolate them, plus there is a long river through the North part of it near the city of Luhansk.
There is a reason Ukraine has not been able to take back land in the area that was taken there since 2014 because it is incredibly costly, and it has been infiltrated with collaborators much more than the other areas. Maybe economically pressuring Russia would get those lands back at a lesser price than lives. After all, it is only 2.8% of the country's land and could cause more problems like terrorist attacks than good.
👎1
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
It’s a much more difficult geography for battle. In Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, a land bridge can be split in half, destroying logistics. Then, in Crimea, the Kerch Bridge could be destroyed, making it fully isolated like an island, eventually leading to the collapse/siege of Russian forces there. The north of Luhansk primarily has fields and a much smaller population, making it easier to take back after breaking through the lines.
However, Donetsk and South Luhansk Oblasts are very dense cities that have been fortified well since 2014, they are also directly connected to Russia via land, there is no land bridge to break or bridge to destroy to isolate them, plus there is a long river through the North part of it near the city of Luhansk.
There is a reason Ukraine has not been able to take back land in the area that was taken there since 2014 because it is incredibly costly, and it has been infiltrated with collaborators much more than the other areas. Maybe economically pressuring Russia would get those lands back at a lesser price than lives. After all, it is only 2.8% of the country's land and could cause more problems like terrorist attacks than good.
It would be rewarding Putin by giving him any territory, but the costs in terms of human lives are in credible high. Ukraine would rather in in NATO with 97% of the country including all of Crimea (by that time the Putin regime may collapse), then spending several hundred thousands more lives to take 2.8% of the country that has been infiltrated with Russian collaborators since 2014. The only way to actually take that land without going on a suicide mission but also taking serious losses would be if the lines are weakened to go around the region by entering deep into Russia then turning South and taking territory toward Rostov-on-Don then holding that and doing a siege of the territory for months. The hope now is to take all of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Crimea, and parts of Donetsk and Luhansk, then by that time have Russsia surrender that territory entirely due many different factors, but if they do not then militarily taking it is something that will even further cause mass casualties amongst Ukrainians.
It’s a much more difficult geography for battle. In Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, a land bridge can be split in half, destroying logistics. Then, in Crimea, the Kerch Bridge could be destroyed, making it fully isolated like an island, eventually leading to the collapse/siege of Russian forces there. The north of Luhansk primarily has fields and a much smaller population, making it easier to take back after breaking through the lines.
However, Donetsk and South Luhansk Oblasts are very dense cities that have been fortified well since 2014, they are also directly connected to Russia via land, there is no land bridge to break or bridge to destroy to isolate them, plus there is a long river through the North part of it near the city of Luhansk.
There is a reason Ukraine has not been able to take back land in the area that was taken there since 2014 because it is incredibly costly, and it has been infiltrated with collaborators much more than the other areas. Maybe economically pressuring Russia would get those lands back at a lesser price than lives. After all, it is only 2.8% of the country's land and could cause more problems like terrorist attacks than good.
It would be rewarding Putin by giving him any territory, but the costs in terms of human lives are in credible high. Ukraine would rather in in NATO with 97% of the country including all of Crimea (by that time the Putin regime may collapse), then spending several hundred thousands more lives to take 2.8% of the country that has been infiltrated with Russian collaborators since 2014. The only way to actually take that land without going on a suicide mission but also taking serious losses would be if the lines are weakened to go around the region by entering deep into Russia then turning South and taking territory toward Rostov-on-Don then holding that and doing a siege of the territory for months. The hope now is to take all of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Crimea, and parts of Donetsk and Luhansk, then by that time have Russsia surrender that territory entirely due many different factors, but if they do not then militarily taking it is something that will even further cause mass casualties amongst Ukrainians.
Ukraine Battle Map (Twitter)
@GabeZZOZZ You’ve been saying this for 2 years, all you do is focus on Ukraine, you are Russian propagandist.
@GabeZZOZZ You’ve been saying this for 2 years, all you do is focus on Ukraine, you are Russian propagandist.
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
Ukrainian Yak-52, which is used to counter Russian reconnaissance drones.
Photo from a Russian Zala reconnaissance drone published by Russians.
Ukrainian Yak-52, which is used to counter Russian reconnaissance drones.
Photo from a Russian Zala reconnaissance drone published by Russians.
🔥11👍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (Twitter)
HIMARS strike on the Russian Zala reconnaissance drone and Lancet loitering munition crews.
https://t.co/wvIRABARSq
HIMARS strike on the Russian Zala reconnaissance drone and Lancet loitering munition crews.
https://t.co/wvIRABARSq
🔥13⚡1