Def Mon (Twitter)

@TomBombadil53 They go from possibly a 4m CEP to a 10m CEP. These are large targets. It would not matter.

 Necro Mancer (Twitter)

@myroslav_d @donbas_ukraine Форум при вражеском ресурсе о потерях техники https://www.lostarmour.info/svo

Necro Mancer (Twitter)

Ещё парочка луганских обменяшек (почему их постоянно в темноте привозят?) и много пиздящая тётка https://xn--r1a.website/millnr/9613 #обмен #2ак #роа

Rob Lee (Twitter)

Video from earlier this month of a Russian T-72B3 tank and BMP firing on Ukrainian positions.
https://xn--r1a.website/i_see_you_8/56

Def Mon (Twitter)

Some people are asking about using M31s beyond 84km, and the precision loss. Yes they loose precision, iirc M31 has a CEP of 4m, lets say that increases to 10m if they shoot at 100m range. They would still hit those warehouses or camps. They would fire more than one rocket.

Def Mon (Twitter)

Another issue is the angle it approaches the target with, if they shoot at longer distances, the angle decreases and Russian Air Defense would have an easier time hitting them.

Def Mon (Twitter)

None of those things would be a problem a real problem.

Necro Mancer (Twitter)

Белгородская обл., линия "Вагнера-Зигфрида" https://xn--r1a.website/riafan_everywhere/13932 #чотаржу #паникинет #Вагнер #роа #Богатов #Среда

The Lookout (Twitter)

Superb work here looking at how Russian logistics have adapted to HIMARS.

Ukraine needs longer range systems, such as ATACMS to hit targets as the one studied below.

Also, caveats on hitting targets inside Russia with Western systems should be lifted.
-----------
@DefMon3:
A 🧵about RU logistics in the Kherson region and why Ukraine needs ATACMS.

In this thread I will talk about how HIMARS affected the Russian logistics, how Russia have managed to recover from the initial HIMARS effects and why Ukraine need long range capabilities like ATACMS. https://t.co/VTAZ7pnyv5

IgorGirkin (Twitter)

10.45 по н.п. Рубежное с применением РСЗО HIMARS (3 ракеты)

...тревожно