— 🇮🇷 NEW: Iranian sources report that Iran's position on a nuclear deal is 'unchanged' and the same as before the 12-Day War

Iran is willing to accept a deal where it is allowed to enrich uranium on Iranian soil up to 3.67% purity—far from the 60% needed for the most primitive nuclear weapons.

All of the current 408 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium would stay in Iran, but Iran is willing to commit to IAEA supervision (i.e. inspections) on these stockpiles—IF a fair and equitable deal is reached.

Any such deal, from Iran's perspective, should include the lifting of all U.S. sanctions on Iran's economy, reconnection to the SWIFT payment system, the release of frozen Iranian assets abroad, and guarantees that the U.S. won't pull out of the Nuclear Deal like President Trump did back in 2018.

Ballistic missile program is absolutely non-negotiable and Khamenei has BANNED any discussions on this topic even taking place.

@Middle_East_Spectator

🇺🇸🇮🇷 US has ZERO interest in negotiations with Iran, its demands are deliberately unreasonable and absurd, and even if Iran agreed to all of them immediately the US would still overthrow Iran and destroy its ability to supply China with oil.

The US wants global primacy, not comprise, and anyone in power outside the US who thinks differently has been and is lying to themselves at the expense of their own survival.

The US is once again using the Brookings 2009 "Which Path to Persia" to sell another strike on Iran as an "Israeli" strike.

And unfortunately people are buying into it again without a single thought or any meaningful learning from last year. Material reality: Israel is 100% incapable of striking Iran in any meaningful manner without absolute, complete, and constant support from the US making it a US strike in all but name - and really, actually - a US strike in name also despite the attempted theatrics.

From Brian Berletic's New Atlas.

NOTE: As I said before, I disagree with Brian about his view on US Israel relations, but I haven't read this particular policy paper yet. Because I trust him on many other things, I will read it in the near future and see if it changes my mind.

This is the paper he references.

"It is clear from discussions with Israeli military and intelligence officials, and from numerous press leaks and reports that Israel is well under way in planning for a military operation to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Israel's defense minister, Ehud Barak, said in 20 that 'the things that we do behind the scenes, far from the public eye, are far more important than the slogan charade," implying that Israeli covert capabilities are already hard at work trying to cope with the Iranian threat and preparing to attack it if they must. It is impossible to know what those plans entail in detail without access to the IDF's secret planning, but Israelis say the mission is "not impossible." The IDF's September 6, 2007 attack on the Syrian nuclear facility at Dayr az-Zawr is widely believed in Israel to have been in part a message to Tehran that Iran may be next."

Ref. p. 90

This policy is intended to convince the government of Iran to change its behavior on issues of critical importance to the United States. It is not intended to try to change the government of Iran. Shortly after taking office, President Obama attempted to underline this point in his Nowruz (Iranian New Year) message to the people of Ira on March 19, 2009, in which he assured Iranians that "The United States wants the Islamic Republic of Iran to take its rightful place in the community of nations." (Emphasis added.) In other words the president was signaling that he was ready to accept the current Iranian regime, not merely the Iranian people, back into the international community if the regime were willing to work constructively with the United States and the rest of the international community.

Ref. p. 24

—❗️🇺🇸/🇮🇷 NEW: U.S. officials told Iran 'it's either this or nothing', and they [Iran] said 'Ok, then nothing' – Axios

@Middle_East_Spectator

— The situation as of now:

America has dropped 2 of its 3 main demands; limitations on the ballistic missile program, and stopping Iran's funding to regional groups (Hezbollah, Houthis etc.)

The Americans have also agreed, despite saying they wouldn't, to move the meeting location to Oman at Iran's request—where purely the nuclear program will be discussed.

Alan Dershowitz: I want to have a list of all the radical feminists who are pushing hard to get the names from the Epstein list revealed.

I want to know, how many of them have ever actually condemned hamas for the rapes. (January 2024)

🇺🇸US Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor-Green is now criticizing Trump and MAGA:

MAGA... I think people are starting to realize that all of this was a lie. It was a big lie for the people. Because in reality, MAGA in this administration doesn't serve the people at all, but rather the big donors. Donors who have already invested substantial funds and continue to donate to presidential funds, to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the USA, to donate to the construction of a large ballroom. And if they pay for all these things, it's they who receive special privileges: they get government contracts and pardons - either for themselves, for someone close to them, or for friends.

And in fact, everything is controlled by foreign states. This is what MAGA really is. And we see how an entire plan is being implemented - essentially, it's a new world order. "Make America Great Again" is not really about America or the American people.

@Slavyangrad

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer says he only has an apology to offer after hiring well-known Jeffrey Epstein associate Peter Mandelson, who recently reports have linked to Epstein’s child trafficking network.

Starmer claims “accountability is coming” while stating that his own government is now investigating itself.

He says he hired him by accident and claims he was “tricked” by him.

“I am sorry for what was done to you”

Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble