The Conspiracy Hole
116K subscribers
18.4K photos
21.1K videos
594 files
18.5K links
Download Telegram
How To Handle A Vaccine Offer
>>> This post is for the newbies <<<
Q: Can your employer require you to be vaxxinated?
A: YES.
Q: Can you refuse?
A: YES
Q: Can they justifiably fire your butt for refusing?
A: YES
Why? Because refusal is belligerence.
So... what to do? What if you have a religious cause for not wanting to be vaxxed? Or what if you just aren't completely certain that it is safe? Or what if you absolutely KNOW it isn't safe because you have read the ingredients list? Is there something you can do besides refuse and get fired or accept and get vaxxed?
YES. YES. And finally YES. But first we have to understand something about "The Four Doors". Gather round...
The Four Doors
Everything in our commercial system is based on contract. It is all about offers. Here are some examples of offers:
1) I want you to get vaxxinated.
2) You owe me $100.
3) Would you like to go to lunch?
4) I am going to punch you in the nose.
5) Please show me I.D.
There are four - AND ONLY FOUR - ways to respond to an offer:
1) Argue
2) Remain silent
3) Unconditionally accept
4) Conditionally accept.
Look at offer #2, "You owe me $100."
Response #1 - If you argue, that is DISHONORABLE and makes you a debtor.
Response #2 - If you remain silent, the other party can get an agreement. You will agree by means of "agreement by acquiescence."
Response #3 - "Here is your $100."
Response #4 - "I conditionally accept your offer to pay you $100 upon proof of your claim I owe you $100.
If you do #1 or #2, you are being dishonorable and it makes you a debtor.
If you do #3 or #4, you are remaining honorable and it makes you a creditor.
Argument is bad. No agreement can be reached thus.
Silence is bad. If you have an obligation to respond in a matter, and you fail to respond, you are AT FAULT. You damage the other party so you become the debtor in the interaction.
Unconditional acceptance keeps you honorable, but usually isn't in your best interest.

Conditional acceptance is where the fun begins.

So let's say your employer says, "I will need you to get vaxxinated by January 1st."
If you argue, you can be fired for cause.
If you remain silent, you are agreeing - you acquiesce - and if you don't comply, you can be fired for cause.
If you unconditionally accept, you just go get the vaccine.
If you conditionally accept, it may look like this:
"I conditionally accept your offer to get vaxxinated upon proof of your claim that:
1) The vaxxine is safe; and
2) The vaxxine will cause no negative side effects; and
3) You agree to be liable for any and all damages."
See how this works? But I wouldn't stop here. There are many maxims of law. One of those maxims is "an unrebutted presumption is truth in commerce." That means if you make a presumption and I do not rebut your presumption, then we have agreed on said presumption. So in this case a good presumption would be:
"Your failure to adequately respond constitutes your agreement that:
- The vaxxine is NOT safe; and
- I will not be terminated from employment for your failure to prove the vaxxine's safety."

Of course there is a bit more to it, but not much.
🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
Information for Healthcare Professionals on Pfizer BioNTech COVID Vaccine

Link to Original Document
Thankyou XAOS for dropping it in the chat.

Some notes from document:

- As with any vaccine, vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 may not protect all
vaccine recipients.
- No data are available on the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in persons that have
previously received a full or partial vaccine series with another COVID-19 vaccine
Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction
- No interaction studies have been performed with other vaccines
- Concomitant administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 with other vaccines has not
been studied
- COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine is not recommended during pregnancy
- Breast-feeding - It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to
the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used
during breast-feeding.
- Fertility - It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.

Only 2 "safety" studies were conducted.
First was 60 participants.
Second was 44,000 Participants, half received the vaccine, half a placebo.
They were evaluated for safety 2 months after the second dose of COVID-19
#Covid #Vaccines

@TheConspiracyHole
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
SLAUGHTERBOTS

In a dystopian world a new form of A.I. weaponry has been created. All these drone bots need is a profile: age, sex, fitness, uniform, and ethnicity. Take out your entire enemy virtually risk free. Just release the swarm and rest easy.

A Silicon Valley CEO-type delivering a presentation to a live audience a la Steve Jobs. The presentation seems innocuous enough at first, unveiling some new drone technology but takes a dark turn when he demonstrates how these autonomous drones can slaughter humans like cattle by delivering “a shaped explosive” to the skull.

The audience eats it up, clapping and laughing along with the CEO as if they hadn’t witnessed anything more dangerous than the unveiling of the iPhone X.

The CEO shows videos of the tiny killer drone in action. “Let’s watch what happens when the weapons make the decisions” as the bot executes a number of people on the massive screen behind him.

Cameras you use for social media make autonomous decisions about who lives and dies.

LINK
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“Squawk Box” co-host Andrew Ross Sorkin and CNBC bond maven Rick Santelli engaged in a heated on-air debate Friday over coronavirus restrictions.

Rex Chapman @RexChapman
Things escalated quickly on CNBC this morning.

This is fantastic...

Link: https://twitter.com/rexchapman/status/1334894131286585358?s=28
#Covid

@TheConspiracyHole
Do you even remember their names now?

@TheConspiracyHole
Forwarded from Blackpilled
No.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jake Coco @jakecoco

Bar owner in Los Angeles CA is livid to see that mayor Garcetti has approved an outdoor dining area for a movie company directly across from her outdoor dining area (which was shut down)

Link: https://twitter.com/jakecoco/status/1334993874276786178
Link: https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/slap-my-face-la-bar-owner-livid-after-city-lets-hollywood-studio-set-dining-tents
#Hollywood

@TheConspiracyHole