An important Colorado lawsuit victory for the grassroots. The SoS of Colorado is a crook!
https://app.advocacytoaction.com/campaign?id=4292
https://app.advocacytoaction.com/campaign?id=4292
Advocacy To Action
Fix 2020 Now: Colorado SecState's Stunning Loss in Court
👍86🔥35👏14❤9🤔1
"Louisiana"
I just learned that Kyle Ardoin, former president of the National Secretary of States Association, will not be continuing in his post.
Fine with me.
I met with Ardoin privately for six hours following the 2022 Louisiana state GOP convention, and showed him in real time how vulnerable his state elections are.
Ardoin agreed, and we launched a strategy to secure Louisiana's elections. Mike Lindell endorsed the strategy, and made a special trip to Louisiana to support Ardoin.
However, Ardoin subsequently reneged, and today even denies meeting with me privately, despite affidavits from the people that provided my transportation and hosted the meeting.
I suspect that someone got to him.
My friends, the people who now centrally manage our elections are not going to relinquish control of them without a fight.
Recently, a senior national official told me, "Dr Frank, you have no idea the forces you are up against."
He may be right, but I am learning.
And in the meantime, Louisiana's citizens will continue to be denied their constitutional right to elections that have integrity.
https://www.fox8live.com/2023/04/12/louisiana-secretary-state-kyle-ardoin-wont-seek-re-election/
I just learned that Kyle Ardoin, former president of the National Secretary of States Association, will not be continuing in his post.
Fine with me.
I met with Ardoin privately for six hours following the 2022 Louisiana state GOP convention, and showed him in real time how vulnerable his state elections are.
Ardoin agreed, and we launched a strategy to secure Louisiana's elections. Mike Lindell endorsed the strategy, and made a special trip to Louisiana to support Ardoin.
However, Ardoin subsequently reneged, and today even denies meeting with me privately, despite affidavits from the people that provided my transportation and hosted the meeting.
I suspect that someone got to him.
My friends, the people who now centrally manage our elections are not going to relinquish control of them without a fight.
Recently, a senior national official told me, "Dr Frank, you have no idea the forces you are up against."
He may be right, but I am learning.
And in the meantime, Louisiana's citizens will continue to be denied their constitutional right to elections that have integrity.
https://www.fox8live.com/2023/04/12/louisiana-secretary-state-kyle-ardoin-wont-seek-re-election/
https://www.fox8live.com
Louisiana Secretary of State Kyle Ardoin won’t seek re-election
Secretary of State Kyle Ardoin, a Republican, is the second high-ranking state official to announce he will not seek re-election in a matter of weeks.
👍73🔥39😢17❤8🤯6😱5🙏4
"New Addition"
Today, I added a California bowtie to my collection.
Thank you, Jeff Mora!
Today, I added a California bowtie to my collection.
Thank you, Jeff Mora!
❤111👍40🕊1
Is Fox News and Dominion Settlement a Set-Up? https://frankspeech.com/video/fox-news-and-dominion-settlement-set
FrankSpeech
Is Fox News and Dominion Settlement a Set-Up?
pPlease go to MyPillow.com and use the promo code B66 to save up to 66% off and Mike Lindell will give a generous percentage back to Brannon Howse Live to support our free broadcasts./p
👍66🔥23🤔5❤1
"Kentucky Election History"
Graphs of the election history for each KY county are provided. Data are from the Secretary of State and the US Census. A summary of the entire state is included at the end.
Each graph shows the population trend for voting age residents, the number of registrants for each federal election, the recent monthly numbers of registrants, and the number of votes tallied in each federal election.
More than forty counties have more "active voters" in the rolls than they have voting age residents. After removal of felons, over eighty counties have more "active voters" than available population.
The KY Secretary of State claims that he is cleaning the voter rolls. His recent meager attempt can be seen in the graphs. Not a very good record after 3+ years in office.
Even after the SoS "clean up," Kentucky still has some of the dirtiest voter rolls in the entire country.
https://rumble.com/v2j885g-kentucky-election-history-summary-slides.html
Graphs of the election history for each KY county are provided. Data are from the Secretary of State and the US Census. A summary of the entire state is included at the end.
Each graph shows the population trend for voting age residents, the number of registrants for each federal election, the recent monthly numbers of registrants, and the number of votes tallied in each federal election.
More than forty counties have more "active voters" in the rolls than they have voting age residents. After removal of felons, over eighty counties have more "active voters" than available population.
The KY Secretary of State claims that he is cleaning the voter rolls. His recent meager attempt can be seen in the graphs. Not a very good record after 3+ years in office.
Even after the SoS "clean up," Kentucky still has some of the dirtiest voter rolls in the entire country.
https://rumble.com/v2j885g-kentucky-election-history-summary-slides.html
Rumble
Kentucky Election History Summary Slides
Graphs of the election history for each KY county are provided. Data are from the Secretary of State and the US Census. A summary of the entire state is included at the end. Each graph shows the popul
👀51🤬28👍16🔥8❤4🤔2😱2
"The $5 Million Challenge"
At Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium in August 2021, he offered a $5 million challenge to dozens of cyber experts to prove that the cyber evidence he provided "unequivocally does NOT reflect information related to the November 2020 election." I am intimately familiar with the details of the event and the challenge. Not only did I emcee the event, I participated in the preparation and daily management of it.
I also served on the panel that evaluated the three claims for the prize. None of the claims even came close to meeting the challenge criteria. I also gave testimony under oath during the recent arbitration. (A four-day process.) I am intimately familiar with all the details of this situation, so I am one of the most qualified to discuss it. I can assure you, the media reporting is full of errors and misrepresentations.
"Unequivocallly" is a very high bar. And the challenge was not to validate the data, but instead to *prove a negative...* which is also a VERY high bar.
In his own submission, in his own words, Zeidman admits that he was unable to decrypt the data files that were provided to him at the Symposium, referring to them as "gibberish."
How can someone prove unequivocally that data are not related to the 2020 election if they can't even read it?
And how can arbitrators not understand this? We decrypted the same files during the arbitration using the same tools we provided the participants at the Symposium.
Not surprisingly, the media is spinning this.
At least now, you know the facts.
At Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium in August 2021, he offered a $5 million challenge to dozens of cyber experts to prove that the cyber evidence he provided "unequivocally does NOT reflect information related to the November 2020 election." I am intimately familiar with the details of the event and the challenge. Not only did I emcee the event, I participated in the preparation and daily management of it.
I also served on the panel that evaluated the three claims for the prize. None of the claims even came close to meeting the challenge criteria. I also gave testimony under oath during the recent arbitration. (A four-day process.) I am intimately familiar with all the details of this situation, so I am one of the most qualified to discuss it. I can assure you, the media reporting is full of errors and misrepresentations.
"Unequivocallly" is a very high bar. And the challenge was not to validate the data, but instead to *prove a negative...* which is also a VERY high bar.
In his own submission, in his own words, Zeidman admits that he was unable to decrypt the data files that were provided to him at the Symposium, referring to them as "gibberish."
How can someone prove unequivocally that data are not related to the 2020 election if they can't even read it?
And how can arbitrators not understand this? We decrypted the same files during the arbitration using the same tools we provided the participants at the Symposium.
Not surprisingly, the media is spinning this.
At least now, you know the facts.
🔥121👍50❤21🤬5🤣1
"FOX vs. Dominion"
I've been publicly stating for over a year that FOX News is no friend to conservatives because FOX News hosts may only report incomplete and filtered news.
I know this because of personal phone calls with the most prominent hosts where they have listed fifteen topics that are contractually off-limits, and may not be discussed on the air. (e.g. Soros, election fraud, vaccine risk, etc.)
Recently, the Dominion lawsuit discovery process has exposed that these same hosts are insincerely reporting the filtered leftovers and are in fact opposed to our grassroots reform movements.
I say again, FOX News is not our friend.
And now that these hypocrites have been exposed, FOX is in damage control mode to protect their most valuable assets (e.g. Hannity, Tucker, and Ingraham)... Which is why they quickly settled.
May I suggest that you never give FOX News another minute of your viewing time.
Instead, watch RSBN, OAN, or other networks willing to report and discuss the issues we most care about.
I've been publicly stating for over a year that FOX News is no friend to conservatives because FOX News hosts may only report incomplete and filtered news.
I know this because of personal phone calls with the most prominent hosts where they have listed fifteen topics that are contractually off-limits, and may not be discussed on the air. (e.g. Soros, election fraud, vaccine risk, etc.)
Recently, the Dominion lawsuit discovery process has exposed that these same hosts are insincerely reporting the filtered leftovers and are in fact opposed to our grassroots reform movements.
I say again, FOX News is not our friend.
And now that these hypocrites have been exposed, FOX is in damage control mode to protect their most valuable assets (e.g. Hannity, Tucker, and Ingraham)... Which is why they quickly settled.
May I suggest that you never give FOX News another minute of your viewing time.
Instead, watch RSBN, OAN, or other networks willing to report and discuss the issues we most care about.
💯137❤78👍42🔥9🤣2
"Fox News host Dan Bongino is leaving the network after the conservative commentator said he and the outlet could not come to terms on a new contract."
TERMS... matter.
TERMS... matter.
👍174❤19🤔8🤣2
"Real News"
One of the most frustrating things I experience when I am speaking to patriot groups around the country is that they have no idea the progress we are making all over the country.
I've resorted to devoting a portion of each of my talks to updating everyone.
I keep telling folks that they need to watch the Lindell Report each weeknight at 6pm central to keep up.
Kinda like tuning in to Rush for ten minutes throughout the week kept you up to date what was REALLY going on.
Boy, do I miss Rush.
Frankspeech.com
Otherwise, you're just another victim of the mainstream propaganda media.
Stop being duped.
Sorry, but that's the straight-up truth.
One of the most frustrating things I experience when I am speaking to patriot groups around the country is that they have no idea the progress we are making all over the country.
I've resorted to devoting a portion of each of my talks to updating everyone.
I keep telling folks that they need to watch the Lindell Report each weeknight at 6pm central to keep up.
Kinda like tuning in to Rush for ten minutes throughout the week kept you up to date what was REALLY going on.
Boy, do I miss Rush.
Frankspeech.com
Otherwise, you're just another victim of the mainstream propaganda media.
Stop being duped.
Sorry, but that's the straight-up truth.
❤161👍42🔥19💯7🤡1
“Setting the Record Straight re Lindell’s $5 Million Challenge”
No, Zeidman did not debunk Lindell’s cyber data. He was only given a tiny sample slice of it, and he was unable to decrypt what he was given, calling it “jibberish.”
I was a judge in the contest, and I testified and was present for the entire arbitration. The judges had nearly zero understanding of cyber data, and Zeidman had a team of high-powered, expensive lawyers.
I had the impression that the claim was intended to harass Mr. Lindell and to gain access to additional information during discovery, because the challenge set an extremely high bar in order to win the prize. The entrant had to prove that the data Mike provided was “unequivocally not related to the 2020 General election.”
How can someone prove that data are unequivocally not related when they weren’t even able to read it?
During the arbitration we decrypted the data slice we’d provided using the resources we’d also provided. Then, the judges themselves noted that the decrypted files had many references to the 2020 General Election.
Hypothetically, even if the data slice provided was fake, it was still *related* to the 2020 election, listing dates, IP addresses, and election tallies directly affiliated with it.
Mike has stated publicly that he intends to challenge the results of the arbitration. Challenging a “binding arbitration” requires a very high bar for evidence. It will not be an easy battle, even though the facts are on his side.
I think the facts speak for themselves, and am flabbergasted that the arbitration panel has ruled in this way. The only plausible explanation I have come up with is that the arbitration panel themselves did not understand the data, and so did not understand themselves how the data were relevant to the election.
But the judges were not the contestants in the challenge, Zeidman was. It was not their job to decide the veracity of the data (unqualified as they are), but to decide whether Zeidman had unequivocally proven that the data were NOT related, which they obviously were, although Zeidman had never even had the opportunity to read it, so of course he did not.
The whole thing smells like a setup.
https://youtu.be/g-F_A1m6oHc
No, Zeidman did not debunk Lindell’s cyber data. He was only given a tiny sample slice of it, and he was unable to decrypt what he was given, calling it “jibberish.”
I was a judge in the contest, and I testified and was present for the entire arbitration. The judges had nearly zero understanding of cyber data, and Zeidman had a team of high-powered, expensive lawyers.
I had the impression that the claim was intended to harass Mr. Lindell and to gain access to additional information during discovery, because the challenge set an extremely high bar in order to win the prize. The entrant had to prove that the data Mike provided was “unequivocally not related to the 2020 General election.”
How can someone prove that data are unequivocally not related when they weren’t even able to read it?
During the arbitration we decrypted the data slice we’d provided using the resources we’d also provided. Then, the judges themselves noted that the decrypted files had many references to the 2020 General Election.
Hypothetically, even if the data slice provided was fake, it was still *related* to the 2020 election, listing dates, IP addresses, and election tallies directly affiliated with it.
Mike has stated publicly that he intends to challenge the results of the arbitration. Challenging a “binding arbitration” requires a very high bar for evidence. It will not be an easy battle, even though the facts are on his side.
I think the facts speak for themselves, and am flabbergasted that the arbitration panel has ruled in this way. The only plausible explanation I have come up with is that the arbitration panel themselves did not understand the data, and so did not understand themselves how the data were relevant to the election.
But the judges were not the contestants in the challenge, Zeidman was. It was not their job to decide the veracity of the data (unqualified as they are), but to decide whether Zeidman had unequivocally proven that the data were NOT related, which they obviously were, although Zeidman had never even had the opportunity to read it, so of course he did not.
The whole thing smells like a setup.
https://youtu.be/g-F_A1m6oHc
YouTube
Expert awarded $5 million for debunking Mike Lindell's election data
MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell has been ordered to shell out $5 million to an expert, Robert Zeidman, who debunked his data related to the 2020 election, according to a decision by the arbitration panel obtained by CNN. Zeidman, who has decades in software development…
👍65🤬38❤17🙏8😱7🤔4👎2🤮2😁1🥱1🤣1