The argument that Joel Berry used is pretty common race-denialist rhetoric, and it makes no sense whatsoever. If race doesn't exist, then how can race-mixing exist?
Very similar to the continuum fallacy: "If race is real, then how do mixed-race people exist? Checkmate, bigot."
This stuff is constantly promoted by Left-Wing activist-academics. Early last year, the inappropriately named "Science" Journal published a study claiming that race isn't real because New York is full of mixed-race people.
Very similar to the continuum fallacy: "If race is real, then how do mixed-race people exist? Checkmate, bigot."
This stuff is constantly promoted by Left-Wing activist-academics. Early last year, the inappropriately named "Science" Journal published a study claiming that race isn't real because New York is full of mixed-race people.
Telegram
Thuletide
Babylon Bee editor has meltdown and promotes genocide of Whites after being called out for posting pro-mass migration nonsense.
(Tweet source)
(Tweet source)
Education majors:
~80% female, average IQ ~110.
Physics majors:
~80% male, average IQ ~133.
Teachers (2017 data):
41% Democrat, 27% Republican.
50% voted for Hillary, 29% for Trump.
No wonder boys hate school, they're being "educated" by female libtard midwits.
~80% female, average IQ ~110.
Physics majors:
~80% male, average IQ ~133.
Teachers (2017 data):
41% Democrat, 27% Republican.
50% voted for Hillary, 29% for Trump.
No wonder boys hate school, they're being "educated" by female libtard midwits.
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Study: Percentage of European ancestry predicts a country's GDP and the quality of its institutions (Source).
"Institutional Quality is the only strongly supported direct predictor of GDP out of the factors considered in these analyses."
"In our analyses institutional quality is linked to several different predictors (i.e. In-group bias, State History, European Ancestry, Latitude, and Timing of Agricultural Transition)"
"countries with substantial European-descendant populations have inherited cultural traits from their European ancestors [...] which are associated with institutional quality"
The authors state that lower in-group bias predicts "more effective institutional performance" but also point out that "lower-levels of in-group bias [...] itself appears related to the proportion of a nation’s population that descends from European countries."
(Post continued here).
"Institutional Quality is the only strongly supported direct predictor of GDP out of the factors considered in these analyses."
"In our analyses institutional quality is linked to several different predictors (i.e. In-group bias, State History, European Ancestry, Latitude, and Timing of Agricultural Transition)"
"countries with substantial European-descendant populations have inherited cultural traits from their European ancestors [...] which are associated with institutional quality"
The authors state that lower in-group bias predicts "more effective institutional performance" but also point out that "lower-levels of in-group bias [...] itself appears related to the proportion of a nation’s population that descends from European countries."
(Post continued here).
Forwarded from LiveLeak
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Germans have taken their lead from the Irish. Hundreds invade the local council offices in Grevesmühlen following their decision to house 400 migrants in the small village of Upahl with a population of only 500.
Follow us -> LiveLeak
Follow us -> LiveLeak
Nature Journal is a great example of the Left's Long March Through The Institutions strategy in action:
1. Leftists infiltrate a prestigious, trusted, and influential organization.
2. They hollow it out, dispose of all "problematic" figures and invert all of its values.
3. They wear its corpse as a skinsuit to trick normal people into trusting them.
"Well, if Nature Journal says that sex has no biological basis and that every ethnic group is indigenous to somewhere except for White people, then it must be true!"
Nature Journal was founded by "scientific racists" in the 1800s, now it reads like a "gender studies" student's Tumblr blog.
1. Leftists infiltrate a prestigious, trusted, and influential organization.
2. They hollow it out, dispose of all "problematic" figures and invert all of its values.
3. They wear its corpse as a skinsuit to trick normal people into trusting them.
"Well, if Nature Journal says that sex has no biological basis and that every ethnic group is indigenous to somewhere except for White people, then it must be true!"
Nature Journal was founded by "scientific racists" in the 1800s, now it reads like a "gender studies" student's Tumblr blog.
Nature
US proposal for defining gender has no basis in science
Nature - A move to classify people on the basis of anatomy or genetics should be abandoned.
Chris Rufo's genius plan to defeat the "woke Left": Replace early 21st Century anti-White ideology with late 20th Century anti-White ideology.
Diversity / Equity / Inclusion is a product of Equality / Merit / Colorblindness. Racial equality is physically impossible, so it has to be doctored with "equity" and enforced by law.
Sneaky Globalists like Rufo are bigger enemies than even the most extreme Leftists. At least Leftists admit that they hate White people.
Rufo pretends to be on our side but, when he lets the mask slip, his true opinions are indistinguishable from the average Globalist technocrat. His "transcending racial distinctions" Tweet could've been posted by any WEF goober.
Rufo opposes CRT, DEI, etc. not because they are anti-White but because:
1. He's worried that his mixed-race Asian kids might suffer some splash damage.
2. He recognizes that the Left has gone too crazy and is causing a backlash against Globalism.
"The frogs are jumping out of the pan! Quick, put them back on slow boil!"
Diversity / Equity / Inclusion is a product of Equality / Merit / Colorblindness. Racial equality is physically impossible, so it has to be doctored with "equity" and enforced by law.
Sneaky Globalists like Rufo are bigger enemies than even the most extreme Leftists. At least Leftists admit that they hate White people.
Rufo pretends to be on our side but, when he lets the mask slip, his true opinions are indistinguishable from the average Globalist technocrat. His "transcending racial distinctions" Tweet could've been posted by any WEF goober.
Rufo opposes CRT, DEI, etc. not because they are anti-White but because:
1. He's worried that his mixed-race Asian kids might suffer some splash damage.
2. He recognizes that the Left has gone too crazy and is causing a backlash against Globalism.
"The frogs are jumping out of the pan! Quick, put them back on slow boil!"
This Affirmative Action moment reminded me of Morgoth's most recent video:
"We have a vast network of mutually reinforcing bodies, regulations, NGOs and politicians. There is no longer an independent factor or moderating voice. It is totalizing and all-encompassing — one giant self-contained mechanism with nothing outside of itself it can refer to, and we are trapped within it. [...] Are we waiting for our own Chernobyl? Has it already happened?"
(Tweet source)
"We have a vast network of mutually reinforcing bodies, regulations, NGOs and politicians. There is no longer an independent factor or moderating voice. It is totalizing and all-encompassing — one giant self-contained mechanism with nothing outside of itself it can refer to, and we are trapped within it. [...] Are we waiting for our own Chernobyl? Has it already happened?"
(Tweet source)
Multiracialism & mass migration are the #1 Globalist agendas and "Civic" "Nationalism" doesn't even exist. The term is a total oxymoron.
'Nation' is cognate with 'ethnic group,' and an ethnic group is a biologically, culturally, and linguistically homogeneous population.
How can you have a multiracial nation? It's like saying you belong to a multiethnic ethnic group. Total nonsense.
So, "Civic Nationalism" = Sneaky Globalism.
Edit: Just call him anti-White and say that he's promoting the main pillar of Globalism (second to creating 'global governance,' obviously).
https://xn--r1a.website/joeldavisx/1668
'Nation' is cognate with 'ethnic group,' and an ethnic group is a biologically, culturally, and linguistically homogeneous population.
How can you have a multiracial nation? It's like saying you belong to a multiethnic ethnic group. Total nonsense.
So, "Civic Nationalism" = Sneaky Globalism.
Edit: Just call him anti-White and say that he's promoting the main pillar of Globalism (second to creating 'global governance,' obviously).
https://xn--r1a.website/joeldavisx/1668
Telegram
Joel Davis
Thuletide is 100% over the target with this criticism of Rufo's cringe the Democrats are the real racists bs, especially his take that people like Rufo are in a sense bigger enemies to us than Leftists because at least they admit that they hate White people.…
Forwarded from Building a Third Force (Gaddius)
A giant point-and-sputter type seethe post from our friends over there at the CFR. It’s interesting that they refer to the broader right-wing movement as “reactionary populism”.
There’s a key passage in here that is very telling:
“Opponents of reactionary populism need to assume that they are in for a protracted political fight. The growing normalization of reactionary populism presents particularly acute dilemmas. Once extremist views become destigmatized, politicians and parties have no choice but to engage with them on their own terms. Efforts to selectively co-opt far-right positions, such as the Danish Social Democrats’ adoption of hard-line policies on immigration and cultural integration, may succeed in diminishing support for radicals. But they also facilitate normalization, which opens the door for extremists to inject ever more radical, illiberal, and authoritarian positions into the mainstream.”
In other words, things are going the direction we want them to and there’s largely nothing they can do about it. The best they can hope for is mainstream parties/institutions co-opt rad-right positions in an effort to moderate or neutralize the energy. But if that happens it just increasingly normalizes the positions. A lose-lose on their end.
Very whitepilling and should be motivation to triple down and keep up the pressure. 👌🏻
https://archive.vn/6mx1G
There’s a key passage in here that is very telling:
“Opponents of reactionary populism need to assume that they are in for a protracted political fight. The growing normalization of reactionary populism presents particularly acute dilemmas. Once extremist views become destigmatized, politicians and parties have no choice but to engage with them on their own terms. Efforts to selectively co-opt far-right positions, such as the Danish Social Democrats’ adoption of hard-line policies on immigration and cultural integration, may succeed in diminishing support for radicals. But they also facilitate normalization, which opens the door for extremists to inject ever more radical, illiberal, and authoritarian positions into the mainstream.”
In other words, things are going the direction we want them to and there’s largely nothing they can do about it. The best they can hope for is mainstream parties/institutions co-opt rad-right positions in an effort to moderate or neutralize the energy. But if that happens it just increasingly normalizes the positions. A lose-lose on their end.
Very whitepilling and should be motivation to triple down and keep up the pressure. 👌🏻
https://archive.vn/6mx1G
archive.vn
The Vexing Rise of the Transnational Right | Foreign Affairs
archived 19 Jan 2023 08:55:59 UTC
Talking basic race realism with ChatGPT:
I previously had an extremely talmudic argument with the AI where I had to trick it into admitting that "discrete, biologically distinct populations" (i.e. races) exist among modern humans.
After this had been established, it admitted that "the overwhelming scientific consensus is that race does have a biological and genetic basis, and that differences in physical and behavioral traits can be partially attributed to genetics."
But only after I explicitly told it to ignore social justice arguments and "ethical issues." Before that, it claimed that race is "a social construct with limited biological basis."
It also gave reasonable information on genetics vs environmental influence with regards to behavior, but I hit a brick wall as soon as I told it to describe population-level differences in behavior.
I previously had an extremely talmudic argument with the AI where I had to trick it into admitting that "discrete, biologically distinct populations" (i.e. races) exist among modern humans.
After this had been established, it admitted that "the overwhelming scientific consensus is that race does have a biological and genetic basis, and that differences in physical and behavioral traits can be partially attributed to genetics."
But only after I explicitly told it to ignore social justice arguments and "ethical issues." Before that, it claimed that race is "a social construct with limited biological basis."
It also gave reasonable information on genetics vs environmental influence with regards to behavior, but I hit a brick wall as soon as I told it to describe population-level differences in behavior.