I often see people dismissing things like the COVID psyop, social credit system, or Great Reset by claiming that globalists are already in power so they don't need or want any more power, and that their grand vision for humanity is just "neo-liberal consumerism" forever and ever, early 2000s ad infinitum or something.

"Well, Mr Rothschild, how about that social credit system?"

"Don't be silly, Mr Rockefeller, we have quite enough power already!"

It's probably just disingenuous contrarianism, as usual, but I was dumbfounded by this take.

Seeing claims that the Buffalo and Texas shooters were in the same discord and groomed by the same guy called 'Armand.'

Haven't been able to confirm anything yet.

Just realized that @Fyrgen is Steed who co-hosted this podcast on the COVID agenda with Morgoth back in July 2021, which was one of the best DR podcasts of the year imo: https://xn--r1a.website/thuletide/1008

I thought I recognized his voice from somewhere

I guess "ontologically evil" is the new leftist meme term.

At least they've moved on from using aloof terms like "privileged" to admitting that they want to kill everyone who isn't a libtard.

Edit: Apparently this Keffals guy ran a discord server grooming underage kids into becoming troons.

More refugees = more crime

I am shocked to my core.

https://xn--r1a.website/thuletide/2880

btw I say "200 years of subversion" because everything kicked up a gear in the 19th Century and retarded ideas began to proliferate:

- Napoleon freed the Jews from their ghettos throughout Europe.
- They began to infiltrate Freemasonry (to mingle with middle and upper class Whites).
- Big merchant banking organizations were founded throughout the West (Kuhn Loeb & Co, M & M Rothschild, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, etc.).
- Bnai Brith and the World Zionist Organization were founded.
- Socialism was invented (technically it came from the French Revolution and people like Babeuf but it was popularized by the Utopian Socialists).
- The Socialist Internationals were established, laying the foundations for organized worldwide left-wing revolutions.
- There was a ton of revolutions (some were based most were libtarded).
- First-wave feminism came along to ruin everything (the term 'feminism' was coined by the socialist Charles Fourier).
- The Ethical Culture Movement was founded, which was extremely influential on globalist ideology.
- Many extremely libtarded esoteric movements were founded (Spiritualism, Theosophical Society, Golden Dawn, Ordo Templi Orientis, etc.).
- Subversive types began to infiltrate Western colleges (e.g. Franz Boas in Columbia University) which was a forerunner of the Long March Through the Institutions of Power.

Obviously subversive activities existed before the 19th Century. These movements and ideas didn't just appear out of thin air. Earlier "esoteric" movements and ideas (Rosicrucianism, Hermeticism, Gnosticism, Kabbalah, etc.) were all influential on what would become the modern globalist ideology. Two big influences that persist to this day are Sabbateanism and Frankism, perverted antinomianist movements that aimed to immanentize the eschaton by violating all moral taboos (based on some gibberish from the Talmud). Some claim that Jacob Frank was some sort of mentor to Adam Weishaupt, who founded the Illuminati with financial backing from Meyer Rothschild, and that this was the beginning of the current NWO conspiracy. That's obviously impossible to prove. The further back in time you go, the more hazy and speculative things become. But we can say for certain that feminism, socialism, merchant banking, the subversion of Western academia, etc. all began or rose to some level of prominence during the 1800s.

This is an interesting little academic article on the study of the social structure of elites.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-45175-2_5

While I basically agree with much of its method of prosopography, I think ultimately the biggest issue with this academic/quantitative approach is that studying the real power elite does not lend itself to data-driven rational inquiry for one simple reason: secrecy. The real "sovereigns" of our society today intentionally occult their own existence and the means by which they exert power behind the scenes.

The author of this paper even admits: "We stress, however, that the quality of an analysis based on prosopographical data rests upon a well-defined, theoretically relevant population, and on access to credible and multifaceted sources and a data collection done with the particular data formats needed, for e.g. social network analysis or sequence analysis, in mind."

We simply lack access to academically "credible and multifaceted sources" in this regard, and our prosopography of the highest tier of elites can only be constructed indirectly and by induction with hints and clues offered by a wide angle study of the circumstantial evidence of historical and social trends, symbolism, correspondences etc. within the institutions exerting power in our society.

I'm on Auron's channel in just under 20 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC2KPf3Ul-E

Why the WEF gang act like cartoon villains with no regard for how the masses perceive them is an interesting question but I think the answer may be quite simple:

Previous globalists worked in the shadows of traditional societies. They had to figure out how to subvert the ruling class, how to buy out politicians, how to inject their ideology into a hostile culture, and so on.

Even after their final victory in 1945, they were still at risk of counter-revolution and had to secure their power by sneakily destroying traditional culture and flooding the West with immigrants.

Today, those tasks are as good as complete. Traditional culture is dead, half of births in the West are non-White, and society has declined to the verge of collapse.

This cultural degeneration combined with the immense wealth and power of the global elite means that they're pretty much unaccountable. They probably think "who's going to stop us?"

ANTIFA and other Leftists grunts are their minions, and the only Right-Wingers who oppose them in any meaningful way have been confined to anonymous internet ghettos or tiny IRL organizations with zero systemic power.

As long as they keep distracting everyone with junk food, porn, drugs, "medication," etc. and destroying the family while flooding the West with migrants, then they're basically unchallengeable.

So, I think it's just hubris. They probably view the plebian masses in the same way that the imperial Roman nobility viewed slaves.

The latest instalment of "contradictory leftist delusions" : Gender is a social construct but trooners are empirically biologically female

https://xn--r1a.website/MorgothsReview/2817

That's a great example of Leftist doublespeak: A country could fight tooth and nail for every Leftist social issue, make its national flag the BIPOCLGBT rainbow and so on, but if it doesn't go full Communism on the economic front then Leftists will declare it to be a Fascist dystopia.

It's their sneaky way of pretending that they don't have total political hegemony. Gotta keep up the illusion that they're the oppressed victims fighting against the bigoted White supremacist system.

"How do the elites create a world where there is less energy for everyone else and more for themselves?

THIS is what ties in so many facets of their strategy that otherwise don't make sense in conventional analytic paradigms: the communism, the promotion of bugman diets (numale diets or veganism), the war on self-sufficiency, the end of tribalism and nationalism, and it goes on and on.

All of it comes down to this: they are trying to create a society where they are the only "humans": independent in thought, ambition, eating a natural human diet, with their physical and intellectual faculties operating at their highest potentials. Being the only humans, they also hold all the power.

Consequently, the rest of humanity is cattle: a literal resource to be farmed at the lowest possible cost per unit (the lowest independent usage of 'precious' resources such as high quality food, fossil fuel, etc.), kept at the number that they need and whose entire life is dedicated to service towards the ruling class (ensured through controlled information and education).

When you understand that these people are solipsistic, power hungry, religiously pursuant to their goals, it makes sense.

It makes sense why they would "go woke, go broke", why they promote paradigms (leftism) which are supposed to hurt their bottom line and strip them of power. It makes sense why they fund anti-meat, anti-dairy, anti-nature propaganda studies than can then be used to justify ever more restrictive dietary policy, it makes sense why their colleges host seminars against homeschooling, and are breeding grounds for feminism and other egalitarian garbage.

It all fits together like a puzzle. Comparatively, a worldview that sees the ruling class as nothing but a bunch of greedy profiteers is woefully incomplete."

- Jaafar in @mwpublic

Remember when weather manipulation was seen as a kooky conspiracy theory?

Every faction of the dissident right briefly putting aside their differences to hate on NRX