Checking in on the British libtards (they're still insane). Two thousand quote tweets of "omg this is literally fascism."
https://twitter.com/StephenJamesGBR/status/1528295204012408832/retweets/with_comments

I've said this before, but there's something very disturbing about British leftists. American leftists generally just screech like unhinged retards or act all smug and ironic. British leftists also do the smug thing too, but they also have this very sinister vibe to them that I don't notice with leftists of other countries. British state propaganda is similar, like they're actively trying to be as creepy and 1984ish as possible.

One of the main ideological divides on the DR is between First Worldists and Third Worldists, epitomized by opinions on Israel / Jews.

First Worldists generally don't care about Israel beyond the Zionist lobby meddling in our affairs (sometimes even praise its policies e.g. genetic testing people for citizenship) and often view Jews as one of many nepotistic out-groups that are openly hostile to our ethnic interests.

Third Worldists generally view Israel as an evil imperialist project that has conquered and oppressed the native Palestinians, and they often hate or resent Jews simply because they are a successful and powerful ethnic group and view Jews (or specifically "Zionists") as some sort of Platonic evil and the source of all worldly poisons.

The third Worldist view leads people to some very wacky conclusions:

- Imperialism/colonialism is inherently evil and bad (because Jews are doing colonialism in Israel), therefore we need to promote Leftist "post-colonialism."
- Private property is bad because Jews use capitalism and corporations to their political advantage.
- If you don't defend the interests of poor oppressed peoples around the world (e.g. the Palestinians) then you are some sort of dysfunctional sociopath (and probably anti-White too).
- Leftists care about poor oppressed peoples and are often anti-Zionist (because they also view Israel as a nasty imperialist project) ergo Leftists are "the good guys."
- Foreign peoples who are openly hostile to Whites but are also hostile to Israel and/or Jews are also "the good guys" and potential political allies.
- Jews are the only foreign ethnic group that is hostile to Whites and every other non-White race would happily be our best friends (if not for those nasty Jews telling them to hate us).
- Everything bad that ever happens is because of Jews and nobody has any agency except Jews (e.g., the Great Reset "isn't real" because "there are no Jews involved").

These sound like strawman but they are pretty much verbatim quotes.

I guess this is all just a handy proxy for master vs slave morality but you can often predict a person's entire worldview, from economics to foreign policy, just from their opinions on Israel.

ICYMI, article:

The Great Replacement: A “White supremacist conspiracy theory” promoted by every Left-Wing media outlet

Contains:
- A short definition of the Great Replacement.
- An explanation of the Celebration Parallax ("it's not happening but it's good that it is and you deserve it").
- Some demographic statistics (population projections and fertility rates).
- An archive of Left-Wing media outlets promoting every aspect of the Great Replacement "conspiracy theory."

President of Alibaba Group says they're developing a "carbon footprint" tracker for "consumers to track their own carbon footprint." It will record everywhere they go, everything they buy, and everything they eat.

This sort of tech will obviously be used for some sort of social credit system and some sort of carbon tax and/or "climate reparations."

United Nations made this voluntary climate reparations platform back in 2016:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160330183327/https://offset.climateneutralnow.org/

"the UN Carbon Offset Platform is an e-commerce platform where a company, an organization or a regular citizen can purchase units (carbon credits) to compensate greenhouse gas emissions or to simply support action on climate."
- https://web.archive.org/web/20220418205051/https://unfccc.int/climate-action/climate-neutral-now/united-nations-carbon-offset-platform

https://xn--r1a.website/joeldavisx/439

"Why did the West only go to shit after WW2 and not before?"

TL;DR answer:

WW2 was the final victory of the globalist cartel over nationalism. It was regime change. They had been trying to subversively wrestle power from Western elites for centuries and finally succeeded. With pesky nationalists and traditional elites of the way (or indoctrinated) they could get to work building the NWO and forcing their vision upon humanity (homosex mocha world).

Longer answer:

All of the stuff you named in your original post contributed to the death of the West in some way (some significantly more than others) but the main cause is pretty simple: Subversion, conquest, and occupation by a hostile elite.

You're right that everything went to shit in the West after WW2 but that's only because the foundations for making everything go to shit were laid before WW2.

It's a huge mistake to discount the genealogical approach because almost all of our problems today are the end result of ~200 years of highly organized subversion. If anything, discounting pre-20th Century events removes agency from history.

If you look at the history of globalist orgs like the United Nations, you see the same names and belief systems recurring time and time again (including some weird connections like Theosophy and Quakerism), many of which remain powerful and influential to this day.

These people worked tirelessly to subvert the Western elite for generation after generation, creating societies and NGOs, colonizing colleges, etc. The Frankfurt School only found a home at Columbia University because it was already infested with Leftists.

The shit that they peddle to the masses today was peddled to Western elites 100 years ago, e.g. trying to normalize sexual revolution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_League_for_Sexual_Reform

Now it's their great-great-grandkids causing the same problems. They do this shit whenever they take power. They did it in Weimar Germany, they did it in Bolshevik Russia, now they're doing it throughout the entire West.

Major difference today is that these problems have been exacerbated immensely by Third Industrial Revolution technologies (e.g. internet), which often have weird glowie/globalist origins.

Edit: But in general I agree with the point that before WW2 basically every nation in the West would be regarded as insane wignats by today's standards, and you can't just handwave away this radical transition by saying "uhh Liberalism umm Marxism" (even if those things contributed to the decline).

The image is from a CNN article correlating weak gun laws with higher homicides and suicides, which it largely doesn't differentiate between, nor does it breakdown racial dynamics.

Wyoming is about 92% White per the 2020 census and most of the gun deaths are suicides. Mississippi is about 37% Black per the 2020 census and most of the gun deaths are homicides and are in the Blackest counties.

54% of all gun deaths in America are suicide. 43% are homicide. The same website, The Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence, goes on to claim that:

Young Black males (15-34) are especially disproportionately impacted, making up 2% of the population but accounting for 38% of all gun homicide fatalities. Their rate of firearm homicide was more than 21 times higher than White males of the same age group.

I often see people dismissing things like the COVID psyop, social credit system, or Great Reset by claiming that globalists are already in power so they don't need or want any more power, and that their grand vision for humanity is just "neo-liberal consumerism" forever and ever, early 2000s ad infinitum or something.

"Well, Mr Rothschild, how about that social credit system?"

"Don't be silly, Mr Rockefeller, we have quite enough power already!"

It's probably just disingenuous contrarianism, as usual, but I was dumbfounded by this take.

Seeing claims that the Buffalo and Texas shooters were in the same discord and groomed by the same guy called 'Armand.'

Haven't been able to confirm anything yet.

Just realized that @Fyrgen is Steed who co-hosted this podcast on the COVID agenda with Morgoth back in July 2021, which was one of the best DR podcasts of the year imo: https://xn--r1a.website/thuletide/1008

I thought I recognized his voice from somewhere

I guess "ontologically evil" is the new leftist meme term.

At least they've moved on from using aloof terms like "privileged" to admitting that they want to kill everyone who isn't a libtard.

Edit: Apparently this Keffals guy ran a discord server grooming underage kids into becoming troons.

More refugees = more crime

I am shocked to my core.

https://xn--r1a.website/thuletide/2880

btw I say "200 years of subversion" because everything kicked up a gear in the 19th Century and retarded ideas began to proliferate:

- Napoleon freed the Jews from their ghettos throughout Europe.
- They began to infiltrate Freemasonry (to mingle with middle and upper class Whites).
- Big merchant banking organizations were founded throughout the West (Kuhn Loeb & Co, M & M Rothschild, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, etc.).
- Bnai Brith and the World Zionist Organization were founded.
- Socialism was invented (technically it came from the French Revolution and people like Babeuf but it was popularized by the Utopian Socialists).
- The Socialist Internationals were established, laying the foundations for organized worldwide left-wing revolutions.
- There was a ton of revolutions (some were based most were libtarded).
- First-wave feminism came along to ruin everything (the term 'feminism' was coined by the socialist Charles Fourier).
- The Ethical Culture Movement was founded, which was extremely influential on globalist ideology.
- Many extremely libtarded esoteric movements were founded (Spiritualism, Theosophical Society, Golden Dawn, Ordo Templi Orientis, etc.).
- Subversive types began to infiltrate Western colleges (e.g. Franz Boas in Columbia University) which was a forerunner of the Long March Through the Institutions of Power.

Obviously subversive activities existed before the 19th Century. These movements and ideas didn't just appear out of thin air. Earlier "esoteric" movements and ideas (Rosicrucianism, Hermeticism, Gnosticism, Kabbalah, etc.) were all influential on what would become the modern globalist ideology. Two big influences that persist to this day are Sabbateanism and Frankism, perverted antinomianist movements that aimed to immanentize the eschaton by violating all moral taboos (based on some gibberish from the Talmud). Some claim that Jacob Frank was some sort of mentor to Adam Weishaupt, who founded the Illuminati with financial backing from Meyer Rothschild, and that this was the beginning of the current NWO conspiracy. That's obviously impossible to prove. The further back in time you go, the more hazy and speculative things become. But we can say for certain that feminism, socialism, merchant banking, the subversion of Western academia, etc. all began or rose to some level of prominence during the 1800s.

This is an interesting little academic article on the study of the social structure of elites.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-45175-2_5

While I basically agree with much of its method of prosopography, I think ultimately the biggest issue with this academic/quantitative approach is that studying the real power elite does not lend itself to data-driven rational inquiry for one simple reason: secrecy. The real "sovereigns" of our society today intentionally occult their own existence and the means by which they exert power behind the scenes.

The author of this paper even admits: "We stress, however, that the quality of an analysis based on prosopographical data rests upon a well-defined, theoretically relevant population, and on access to credible and multifaceted sources and a data collection done with the particular data formats needed, for e.g. social network analysis or sequence analysis, in mind."

We simply lack access to academically "credible and multifaceted sources" in this regard, and our prosopography of the highest tier of elites can only be constructed indirectly and by induction with hints and clues offered by a wide angle study of the circumstantial evidence of historical and social trends, symbolism, correspondences etc. within the institutions exerting power in our society.

I'm on Auron's channel in just under 20 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC2KPf3Ul-E

Why the WEF gang act like cartoon villains with no regard for how the masses perceive them is an interesting question but I think the answer may be quite simple:

Previous globalists worked in the shadows of traditional societies. They had to figure out how to subvert the ruling class, how to buy out politicians, how to inject their ideology into a hostile culture, and so on.

Even after their final victory in 1945, they were still at risk of counter-revolution and had to secure their power by sneakily destroying traditional culture and flooding the West with immigrants.

Today, those tasks are as good as complete. Traditional culture is dead, half of births in the West are non-White, and society has declined to the verge of collapse.

This cultural degeneration combined with the immense wealth and power of the global elite means that they're pretty much unaccountable. They probably think "who's going to stop us?"

ANTIFA and other Leftists grunts are their minions, and the only Right-Wingers who oppose them in any meaningful way have been confined to anonymous internet ghettos or tiny IRL organizations with zero systemic power.

As long as they keep distracting everyone with junk food, porn, drugs, "medication," etc. and destroying the family while flooding the West with migrants, then they're basically unchallengeable.

So, I think it's just hubris. They probably view the plebian masses in the same way that the imperial Roman nobility viewed slaves.

The latest instalment of "contradictory leftist delusions" : Gender is a social construct but trooners are empirically biologically female