https://xn--r1a.website/tolerantfellowgram/446

How is it "disinformation" to point out that all of the leading global governance organizations, think tanks, bankers, etc. are promoting the Great Replacement? Orgs like UN, CFR, and WEF represent the interests of the ruling class.

I've already wrote a ton of stuff explaining when open borders were implemented, who was behind it, etc. - e.g. I posted this about the ADL not even 24 hours ago https://xn--r1a.website/thuletide/2861

Homosexual Israeli transhumanist WEF shill Yuval Noah Harari (one of Bill Gates' favorite authors):

"Covid is critical because this is what convinces people to accept to legitimize total biometric surveillance. We need to not just monitor people, we need to monitor what’s happening under their skin”

This is like a tacky caricature of a "bad guy", but basically all transhumanists are like this. Zero self-awareness. Or maybe they just don't care how they come across to the plebian masses.

Checking in on the British libtards (they're still insane). Two thousand quote tweets of "omg this is literally fascism."
https://twitter.com/StephenJamesGBR/status/1528295204012408832/retweets/with_comments

I've said this before, but there's something very disturbing about British leftists. American leftists generally just screech like unhinged retards or act all smug and ironic. British leftists also do the smug thing too, but they also have this very sinister vibe to them that I don't notice with leftists of other countries. British state propaganda is similar, like they're actively trying to be as creepy and 1984ish as possible.

One of the main ideological divides on the DR is between First Worldists and Third Worldists, epitomized by opinions on Israel / Jews.

First Worldists generally don't care about Israel beyond the Zionist lobby meddling in our affairs (sometimes even praise its policies e.g. genetic testing people for citizenship) and often view Jews as one of many nepotistic out-groups that are openly hostile to our ethnic interests.

Third Worldists generally view Israel as an evil imperialist project that has conquered and oppressed the native Palestinians, and they often hate or resent Jews simply because they are a successful and powerful ethnic group and view Jews (or specifically "Zionists") as some sort of Platonic evil and the source of all worldly poisons.

The third Worldist view leads people to some very wacky conclusions:

- Imperialism/colonialism is inherently evil and bad (because Jews are doing colonialism in Israel), therefore we need to promote Leftist "post-colonialism."
- Private property is bad because Jews use capitalism and corporations to their political advantage.
- If you don't defend the interests of poor oppressed peoples around the world (e.g. the Palestinians) then you are some sort of dysfunctional sociopath (and probably anti-White too).
- Leftists care about poor oppressed peoples and are often anti-Zionist (because they also view Israel as a nasty imperialist project) ergo Leftists are "the good guys."
- Foreign peoples who are openly hostile to Whites but are also hostile to Israel and/or Jews are also "the good guys" and potential political allies.
- Jews are the only foreign ethnic group that is hostile to Whites and every other non-White race would happily be our best friends (if not for those nasty Jews telling them to hate us).
- Everything bad that ever happens is because of Jews and nobody has any agency except Jews (e.g., the Great Reset "isn't real" because "there are no Jews involved").

These sound like strawman but they are pretty much verbatim quotes.

I guess this is all just a handy proxy for master vs slave morality but you can often predict a person's entire worldview, from economics to foreign policy, just from their opinions on Israel.

ICYMI, article:

The Great Replacement: A “White supremacist conspiracy theory” promoted by every Left-Wing media outlet

Contains:
- A short definition of the Great Replacement.
- An explanation of the Celebration Parallax ("it's not happening but it's good that it is and you deserve it").
- Some demographic statistics (population projections and fertility rates).
- An archive of Left-Wing media outlets promoting every aspect of the Great Replacement "conspiracy theory."

President of Alibaba Group says they're developing a "carbon footprint" tracker for "consumers to track their own carbon footprint." It will record everywhere they go, everything they buy, and everything they eat.

This sort of tech will obviously be used for some sort of social credit system and some sort of carbon tax and/or "climate reparations."

United Nations made this voluntary climate reparations platform back in 2016:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160330183327/https://offset.climateneutralnow.org/

"the UN Carbon Offset Platform is an e-commerce platform where a company, an organization or a regular citizen can purchase units (carbon credits) to compensate greenhouse gas emissions or to simply support action on climate."
- https://web.archive.org/web/20220418205051/https://unfccc.int/climate-action/climate-neutral-now/united-nations-carbon-offset-platform

https://xn--r1a.website/joeldavisx/439

"Why did the West only go to shit after WW2 and not before?"

TL;DR answer:

WW2 was the final victory of the globalist cartel over nationalism. It was regime change. They had been trying to subversively wrestle power from Western elites for centuries and finally succeeded. With pesky nationalists and traditional elites of the way (or indoctrinated) they could get to work building the NWO and forcing their vision upon humanity (homosex mocha world).

Longer answer:

All of the stuff you named in your original post contributed to the death of the West in some way (some significantly more than others) but the main cause is pretty simple: Subversion, conquest, and occupation by a hostile elite.

You're right that everything went to shit in the West after WW2 but that's only because the foundations for making everything go to shit were laid before WW2.

It's a huge mistake to discount the genealogical approach because almost all of our problems today are the end result of ~200 years of highly organized subversion. If anything, discounting pre-20th Century events removes agency from history.

If you look at the history of globalist orgs like the United Nations, you see the same names and belief systems recurring time and time again (including some weird connections like Theosophy and Quakerism), many of which remain powerful and influential to this day.

These people worked tirelessly to subvert the Western elite for generation after generation, creating societies and NGOs, colonizing colleges, etc. The Frankfurt School only found a home at Columbia University because it was already infested with Leftists.

The shit that they peddle to the masses today was peddled to Western elites 100 years ago, e.g. trying to normalize sexual revolution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_League_for_Sexual_Reform

Now it's their great-great-grandkids causing the same problems. They do this shit whenever they take power. They did it in Weimar Germany, they did it in Bolshevik Russia, now they're doing it throughout the entire West.

Major difference today is that these problems have been exacerbated immensely by Third Industrial Revolution technologies (e.g. internet), which often have weird glowie/globalist origins.

Edit: But in general I agree with the point that before WW2 basically every nation in the West would be regarded as insane wignats by today's standards, and you can't just handwave away this radical transition by saying "uhh Liberalism umm Marxism" (even if those things contributed to the decline).

The image is from a CNN article correlating weak gun laws with higher homicides and suicides, which it largely doesn't differentiate between, nor does it breakdown racial dynamics.

Wyoming is about 92% White per the 2020 census and most of the gun deaths are suicides. Mississippi is about 37% Black per the 2020 census and most of the gun deaths are homicides and are in the Blackest counties.

54% of all gun deaths in America are suicide. 43% are homicide. The same website, The Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence, goes on to claim that:

Young Black males (15-34) are especially disproportionately impacted, making up 2% of the population but accounting for 38% of all gun homicide fatalities. Their rate of firearm homicide was more than 21 times higher than White males of the same age group.

I often see people dismissing things like the COVID psyop, social credit system, or Great Reset by claiming that globalists are already in power so they don't need or want any more power, and that their grand vision for humanity is just "neo-liberal consumerism" forever and ever, early 2000s ad infinitum or something.

"Well, Mr Rothschild, how about that social credit system?"

"Don't be silly, Mr Rockefeller, we have quite enough power already!"

It's probably just disingenuous contrarianism, as usual, but I was dumbfounded by this take.