Most useful term(s) to describe immigration into White countries?
Anonymous Poll
32%
Replacement Migration
35%
The Great Replacement
39%
White Genocide
19%
White Ethnic Displacement
9%
Colonization
5%
None of the above / Other
The ADL report on "extremist-related killings" by political alignment boosts its "right-wing extremism" figures by including:
- Prison gang activity (but only White gangs)
- All domestic violence
- Any White mass shooter regardless of political affiliation (including self-described Socialists)
- The Left-Wing anarchist "Boogaloo" people
They conveniently didn't include any BLM-ANTIFA terrorism (the terms weren't mentioned once), including the Waukesha attack, which was facilitated by BLM-ANTIFA bail money via The Bail Project (which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation btw).
"Left-wing extremism" should include any POC-on-White attacks committed by criminals who were previously bailed out by BLM-ANTIFA organizations. Leftists use these violent criminals as footsoldiers while hiding behind the façade of "fighting against systemic racism and injustice :^)"
Report here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220216071010/https://www.adl.org/media/17498/download
- Prison gang activity (but only White gangs)
- All domestic violence
- Any White mass shooter regardless of political affiliation (including self-described Socialists)
- The Left-Wing anarchist "Boogaloo" people
They conveniently didn't include any BLM-ANTIFA terrorism (the terms weren't mentioned once), including the Waukesha attack, which was facilitated by BLM-ANTIFA bail money via The Bail Project (which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation btw).
"Left-wing extremism" should include any POC-on-White attacks committed by criminals who were previously bailed out by BLM-ANTIFA organizations. Leftists use these violent criminals as footsoldiers while hiding behind the façade of "fighting against systemic racism and injustice :^)"
Report here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220216071010/https://www.adl.org/media/17498/download
This retard cites Ben Franklin's 18th century /pol/ shitpost about every European ethnic group except for Anglo-Saxons being swarthy and non-White as evidence that the White race doesn't exist
https://youtu.be/EQikPmIdYyQ
https://youtu.be/EQikPmIdYyQ
YouTube
White People Do Not Exist
The Buffalo shooter describes the Great Replacement Theory in his manifesto, about how someone is trying to bring in immigrants to destroy the white race. I hate to tell you this, but the concept of white people does not exist and is really about creating…
When Leftists finally quit gaslighting and admit that the Great Replacement is occurring, they always claim that it's just a "natural" process and not deliberately engineered, but the fact that it's happening at all proves that it is deliberately engineered. Countries have the power to control their own borders. If the ruling class did not want immigration, it would not have immigration. Simple.
A few short articles I wrote earlier this year, on the topics of NWO / technocracy / COVID stuff
1. Great Reset = Neo-Holodomor? ‘Food Chain Reaction’: A simulation like Operation Lockstep but for a global famine caused by food chain collapse
2. Huge Plandemic News: Hunter Biden DID help secure millions in funding for US contractor ‘Metabiota’ specializing in deadly pathogen research [Involves CIA, Bill Gates, DARPA, the CCP & more]
3. The UN Addis Ababa Action Agenda [Sustainable Development, Agenda 2030, and International Finance]
4. The origin of “Build Back Better” [short post]
1. Great Reset = Neo-Holodomor? ‘Food Chain Reaction’: A simulation like Operation Lockstep but for a global famine caused by food chain collapse
2. Huge Plandemic News: Hunter Biden DID help secure millions in funding for US contractor ‘Metabiota’ specializing in deadly pathogen research [Involves CIA, Bill Gates, DARPA, the CCP & more]
3. The UN Addis Ababa Action Agenda [Sustainable Development, Agenda 2030, and International Finance]
4. The origin of “Build Back Better” [short post]
Wiki: Opposition to immigration
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_immigration
Surprised that such a page is allowed to exist. I wonder if it's scheduled for deletion, and when they will add another section "debunking" all of the "outdated" and "pseudoscientific" arguments against immigration?
Archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220504044634/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_immigration
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_immigration
Surprised that such a page is allowed to exist. I wonder if it's scheduled for deletion, and when they will add another section "debunking" all of the "outdated" and "pseudoscientific" arguments against immigration?
Archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220504044634/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_immigration
"The only recorded case of a trans woman having a uterus transplant in 1931 led to her death."
— https://archive.ph/O8VVt
"In 1930, Elbe went to Germany for sex reassignment surgery, which was highly experimental at the time. A series of four operations were carried out over a period of two years.[23] The first surgery, removal of the testicles, was performed by Erwin Gohrbandt, under the supervision of sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld in Berlin."
— https://archive.ph/5fuQd
Some info in Hirschfeld here:
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/25/the-world-league-for-sexual-reform-pioneers-in-abortion-birth-control-and-transgenderism/
— https://archive.ph/O8VVt
"In 1930, Elbe went to Germany for sex reassignment surgery, which was highly experimental at the time. A series of four operations were carried out over a period of two years.[23] The first surgery, removal of the testicles, was performed by Erwin Gohrbandt, under the supervision of sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld in Berlin."
— https://archive.ph/5fuQd
Some info in Hirschfeld here:
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/25/the-world-league-for-sexual-reform-pioneers-in-abortion-birth-control-and-transgenderism/
Article:
The Great Replacement: A “White supremacist conspiracy theory” promoted by every Left-Wing media outlet
Contains:
- A short definition of the Great Replacement.
- An explanation of the Celebration Parallax ("it's not happening but it's good that it is and you deserve it").
- Some demographic statistics (population projections and fertility rates).
- An archive of Left-Wing media outlets promoting every aspect of the Great Replacement "conspiracy theory."
The Great Replacement: A “White supremacist conspiracy theory” promoted by every Left-Wing media outlet
Contains:
- A short definition of the Great Replacement.
- An explanation of the Celebration Parallax ("it's not happening but it's good that it is and you deserve it").
- Some demographic statistics (population projections and fertility rates).
- An archive of Left-Wing media outlets promoting every aspect of the Great Replacement "conspiracy theory."
Tom Walker
The Great Replacement: A “White supremacist conspiracy theory” promoted by every Left-Wing media outlet
It’s not happening but it’s good that it is (and you deserve it for being a bigot).
https://xn--r1a.website/BertieBassett4Life/3725
With leftist theory, most of their observations are true, it's just that their rationalizations, conclusions, and solutions are always totally retarded. Plus, their works are full of needlessly convoluted and verbose gibberish.
Those guys did write some useful stuff, but it all seems pretty straightforward and obvious when you translate it into normal person language. I'll summarize below for anyone who isnt familiar.
Basically, these Western/Cultural Marxist guys (Althusser, Gramsci, etc) were trying to figure out why The Revolution failed everywhere except the place they didnt expect it to succeed, and why all of the proles of Europe sided with their "oppressors" over a bunch of Marxist scumbags who just wanted to become their new oppressors, and to destroy all of their nations, traditions, and cultural values.
Normal people say "we dont want to destroy all of our own culture etc because these things give our lives meaning, stability, serve biologically adaptive purposes (e.g. marriage traditions promote fertility and community), and so on." But Marxists basically think all of that stuff is a spook invented by the nasty capitalists to enslave the masses through "false consciousness" and make them love their own oppression, so they have to invent a bunch of convoluted theories to explain it.
Not really familiar with his solutions, but Althusser's theory of ideology is basically just that the ruling class use both ideology and force to make the masses do what they want, and that the masses are a bunch of NPCs with no agency who are programmed by ideology to live a certain way. Some other leftists semi-deb00nked this point by saying "then why do some people resist the dominant ideology?"
Gramsci's theory of cultural hegemony is pretty similar: The ruling class uses apparatus like media and education, alongside manipulation of language etc., to program the masses with an ideology by normalizing it as the default culture. This tricks the masses into thinking that the ideology is just "common sense." See modern Leftists who claim that their insane beliefs (e.g. child genital mutilation) are just "being a good person" — it's a "fish doesnt know it's in water" situation.
Foucault imo was the most interesting and seemed to have more original ideas. His theory of power is that it isnt held by one individual or group but expressed at every level of society. If someone can make you do something against your will, they have power over you. Helpful for understanding the "oppression olympics" inverted power hierarchy in the west (gay trumps straight, POC trumps gay, trans trumps all, etc.). Foucault wrote a bunch of genealogies on power using selected case studies (e.g. prison systems) to figure out how "power" of ruling class is expressed in modern societies, where it seems to be hidden. He invented different modes of power that operate in conjunction and build on one another. His baseline is sovereign power (to kill and take), and then disciplinary power (to regulate behavior), and biopower (to control biology and life of entire societies). He also talked of pastoral power (coercive nurturing with a religious/salvation aspect) - a good example of this is the leftist regime declaring that they "fight for the oppressed." This is extremely simplified ofc.
Anyway, back to my original point : most leftist theory is just pointing at normal stuff and then pathologizing it, but sometimes they do have useful observations. it's just that nothing else they say is useful.
Edit: btw not dunking on AA here at all I just saw his post and went on a ramble
With leftist theory, most of their observations are true, it's just that their rationalizations, conclusions, and solutions are always totally retarded. Plus, their works are full of needlessly convoluted and verbose gibberish.
Those guys did write some useful stuff, but it all seems pretty straightforward and obvious when you translate it into normal person language. I'll summarize below for anyone who isnt familiar.
Basically, these Western/Cultural Marxist guys (Althusser, Gramsci, etc) were trying to figure out why The Revolution failed everywhere except the place they didnt expect it to succeed, and why all of the proles of Europe sided with their "oppressors" over a bunch of Marxist scumbags who just wanted to become their new oppressors, and to destroy all of their nations, traditions, and cultural values.
Normal people say "we dont want to destroy all of our own culture etc because these things give our lives meaning, stability, serve biologically adaptive purposes (e.g. marriage traditions promote fertility and community), and so on." But Marxists basically think all of that stuff is a spook invented by the nasty capitalists to enslave the masses through "false consciousness" and make them love their own oppression, so they have to invent a bunch of convoluted theories to explain it.
Not really familiar with his solutions, but Althusser's theory of ideology is basically just that the ruling class use both ideology and force to make the masses do what they want, and that the masses are a bunch of NPCs with no agency who are programmed by ideology to live a certain way. Some other leftists semi-deb00nked this point by saying "then why do some people resist the dominant ideology?"
Gramsci's theory of cultural hegemony is pretty similar: The ruling class uses apparatus like media and education, alongside manipulation of language etc., to program the masses with an ideology by normalizing it as the default culture. This tricks the masses into thinking that the ideology is just "common sense." See modern Leftists who claim that their insane beliefs (e.g. child genital mutilation) are just "being a good person" — it's a "fish doesnt know it's in water" situation.
Foucault imo was the most interesting and seemed to have more original ideas. His theory of power is that it isnt held by one individual or group but expressed at every level of society. If someone can make you do something against your will, they have power over you. Helpful for understanding the "oppression olympics" inverted power hierarchy in the west (gay trumps straight, POC trumps gay, trans trumps all, etc.). Foucault wrote a bunch of genealogies on power using selected case studies (e.g. prison systems) to figure out how "power" of ruling class is expressed in modern societies, where it seems to be hidden. He invented different modes of power that operate in conjunction and build on one another. His baseline is sovereign power (to kill and take), and then disciplinary power (to regulate behavior), and biopower (to control biology and life of entire societies). He also talked of pastoral power (coercive nurturing with a religious/salvation aspect) - a good example of this is the leftist regime declaring that they "fight for the oppressed." This is extremely simplified ofc.
Anyway, back to my original point : most leftist theory is just pointing at normal stuff and then pathologizing it, but sometimes they do have useful observations. it's just that nothing else they say is useful.
Edit: btw not dunking on AA here at all I just saw his post and went on a ramble
Telegram
Bertie Bassett
Appreciate this from this chap. I may do a substack at some point about which ideas exactly I've taken from the New Left and why. Leftwing work on power — the line of Gramsci, Althusser and Foucault — is not worthless. And there's an argument to see them…
The Great Replacement is a top-down project:
1. UN coins "Replacement Migration" agenda, citing low birth rates as justification for using mass migration to ethnically cleanse the native populations of Europe, North America, Russia, Japan and Korea.
2. EU co-signs this idea.
3. IMF (part of UN) calls for these nations to open their borders to mass migration.
4. World Bank (also part of UN) says that immigration is the best way to achieve the "goals of the World Bank."
5. World Economic Forum (official UN partner) says Europe "needs" migrants.
6. Rockefeller Foundation (helped found UN) says immigration makes US stronger, donates millions to ACLU, ADL, and IRC (UN-linked org).
7. Council on Foreign Relations says that the problem with immigration is that we don't have enough.
8. So does the Federal Reserve.
9. George Soros invests hundreds of millions in promoting immigration, his think tank declares it a "human right."
10. Bloomberg (official WEF partner) shills for mass migration into Japan.
1. UN coins "Replacement Migration" agenda, citing low birth rates as justification for using mass migration to ethnically cleanse the native populations of Europe, North America, Russia, Japan and Korea.
2. EU co-signs this idea.
3. IMF (part of UN) calls for these nations to open their borders to mass migration.
4. World Bank (also part of UN) says that immigration is the best way to achieve the "goals of the World Bank."
5. World Economic Forum (official UN partner) says Europe "needs" migrants.
6. Rockefeller Foundation (helped found UN) says immigration makes US stronger, donates millions to ACLU, ADL, and IRC (UN-linked org).
7. Council on Foreign Relations says that the problem with immigration is that we don't have enough.
8. So does the Federal Reserve.
9. George Soros invests hundreds of millions in promoting immigration, his think tank declares it a "human right."
10. Bloomberg (official WEF partner) shills for mass migration into Japan.