“A networked society behaves like a multicellular organism...random damage is like lopping off a chunk of sheep. Whether or not the sheep survives depends upon which chunk is lost....When we do the analysis, almost any part is critical if you lose enough of it.... Now that we can ask questions of such systems in more sophisticated ways, we are discovering that they can be very vulnerable. That means civilisation is very vulnerable”.

Yaneer Bar-Yam, New England Complex Systems Institute

http://feasta.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Trade_Off_Korowicz.pdf

This is an absolutely fascinating piece of work by a person who realised that, as more & more of the systems around us & on what we literally depend in order to stay alive, become so integrated that the potential for “contagion” becomes more an expectation rather a risk to worry about at 2am.
How? Well, a failure of a component has the potential to pull down an adjacent component and, in turn, there’s a very real risk of TOTAL SYSTEMS COLLAPSE.
Such a fall of the dominoes is not a risk, but a certainty.
Much cleverer people than me knew that what was being built was (arguably) “metastable”.
There are insufficient “firebreaks” in the financial system, for example. This was brought starkly into our faces in the Global Financial Crisis (2009?).
I don’t have any special insights but I now regard the GFC differently than I used to. Back then, the story was that it was all about greedy, corrupt banks, selling mortgage backed securities. They knew that some of the mortgage debts held in these products were non-performing from the off. They thought that by blending these mortgages with many more mortgages that were likely to perform, they could unload the debts widely across the base (& thereby get away with their crimes).
What is reported to have happened is that, eventually, banks lost confidence in each other’s ability to service its own debts, so such a bank simply refused to do business with others which they thought represented too great a “counterparty risk”.
The entire global banking system got into serious trouble. You’ll recall the “taxpayer funded bailouts” & “lenders of last resort” wrote virtual cheques that had so many zeros that there was no longer a counterparty risk without solutions.
I’m now not at all convinced that the GFC was a spontaneous event.
Note that many of the most important actors in our environment today are those in charge of key components of the financial system. They were in related positions in 2009
and now.
How useful was it to the those I call “the perpetrators” to have already proven they could “print and spend” almost unlimited sums of money to fund the lockdowns.
Not my original idea that the GFC was engineered (at least in part) in order to (1) frighten the public; (2) create a precedent, without which many people might have been red-pilled by the reckless absurdity of furlough and (3) permit the perpetrators to have a dress rehearsal of what they have in store for us.

Have a look for yourself and decide. They definitely are the planning to do something very serious to the global financial system as part of The Great Reset.

This is why others, like Catherine Austin Fitts, implore us to use cash for every transaction that you legally can. Yes, it’s less convenient sometimes. But please know this: the authorities have no idea what that £20 note was being used for. Remember also that the same banknote could have been used in dozens of transactions rather than to have been banked. The crooks in the Bank of International Settlements & all points below that hate you using cash. That’s because you’re invisible. Now they cannot predict the outcome of triggering a financial reset and lack of ability to see the future is anathema to them. If enough of us push back by using cash for all small (under £250 or under £100, whatever) transactions, I genuinely believe we could delay or deflect what’s coming.

Regardless of all the financial implications of this article, there’s a great deal else worth reading about.

Best wishes,
Mike

Exercise Catastrophic Contagion Pandemic Simulation - October 2022

"The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.

The extraordinary group of participants consisted of 10 current and former Health Ministers and senior public health officials from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola, Liberia, Singapore, India, Germany, as well as Bill Gates, co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The exercise simulated a series of WHO emergency health advisory board meetings addressing a fictional pandemic set in the near future.
Participants grappled with how to respond to an epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people.

Participants were challenged to make urgent policy decisions with limited information in the face of uncertainty. Each problem and choice had serious health, economic, and social ramifications."

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/2022-catastrophic-contagion/index.html

[***SCENARIO***]

https://youtu.be/M-skwhRFWe0

Exercise Participants:

Awa Marie Coll-Seck, Minister of State to the President, Republic of Senegal;

Mark Dybul, Professor of Medicine, Georgetown University, United States;

Tom Frieden, CEO and President, Resolve to Save Lives, United States;

Bill Gates, Co-Chair, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, United States;

Johanna Hanefeld, Director & Head of Department, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Germany;

Donald Kaberuka, Special Envoy on COVID-19, African Union, Rwanda;

Tolbert Geewleh Nyenswah, Senior Research Associate, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States;

Muhammed Ali Pate, Julio Frenk Professor of Public Health Leadership, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, United States;

Luis Gomes Sambo, Research Fellow, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Angola; K. Vijay Raghavan, DAE Homi Bhabha Chair, National Centre for Biological Sciences, India.

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security briefly recaps the Catastrophic Contagion: A Global Response Challenge fictional pandemic containment simulation from Sunday 23 October.

From the 2022 meeting in Brussels, Belgium

Oct 23, 2022

My latest article for UK Column :

https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/canadas-expanding-euthanasia-laws-making-the-unthinkable-thinkable-again

Population Biology of the Human Restricted Pathogen, Streptococcus pyogenes (Strep A)

"Most morbidity and mortality due to S. pyogenes arises from invasive and autoimmune disease, although each is somewhat rare in occurrence when compared to the mild infections at the throat and skin. Rheumatic fever is an autoimmune disorder that can have serious cardiac manifestations. Invasive disease is the result of streptococcal infection of deep tissue and can be moderate to quite severe, such as in cases of toxic shock syndrome and necrotizing fasciitis.

In addition to causing clinical infection at the throat and skin, S. pyogenes can persist in a quiescent carrier state; it is not uncommon for throat carriage rates to exceed 15–20% within communities of school-aged children during seasonal peaks (Bisno & Stevens, 2005). The carrier state elicits little or no immune response to streptococcal antigens, and throat carriage can persist for weeks or months.. The carrier state elicits little or no immune response to streptococcal antigens, and throat carriage can persist for weeks or months"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685916/

The Truth About Strep A

1. The deaths with Strep A are actually deaths from autoimmune disease from other causes (eg weakened immune system from "vaccines") exacerbated by Strep A infection.

2. Strep A is already present in a non infectious state in 15-20% of the population, meaning if you test exclusively for it you will find it in 1 in 5 people, if not more.

t.me/robinmg/25205

In the full length promotional video commissioned for Simons, a beautiful, mystical blue whale appears in the frame 5-6 times. This could mean different things to different people. To a child or young adult, the association may be something that many adults are completely unaware of.

"The Blue Whale Challenge is a suicide "game" that first appeared on social media platforms... The challenge occurs over the course of 50 days, during which "players" are instructed by "administrators" to engage in daily tasks involving increasingly injurious forms of self-harm. The name of the challenge originates from an unexplained phenomenon wherein whales, highly social animals that travel in herds, stray from the herd and beach themselves in a seemingly deliberate manner, causing their demise...

Social media will evolve and continue to give rise to cultural trends and fads of all kinds; all of these are forms of contagion. But clearly, contagion promoting self-harm and suicidality cannot be tolerated... Best practices should be followed by all media when broaching these issues, including avoiding details about how a specific suicide took place, sharing the content of a suicide note, or providing personal details about the individual who died. Most importantly, self-harm and suicide should never be glamorized or romanticized. Additionally, all discussion of suicide in the media should reinforce that coping skills, support, and treatment are effective tools to thwart this behavior.

The Blue Whale Challenge is an example of how modern constructs like social media can glorify self-harm and suicide, thereby perpetuating an age-old problem like suicide contagion. Young people are particularly vulnerable."

https://www.psychiatrist.com/pcc/depression/suicide/blue-whale-challenge-social-media-self-harm-suicide-contagion/

Merkel Spills Beans on How U.S. and NATO Partners Planned War in Ukraine Against Russia

"Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel (2005-2021) is the latest Western source to come clean or let their guard down. She disclosed in a recent interview with Der Spiegel the real roots of the war.
Merkel’s reprehensible revelation is inadvertent. She refers to appeasing the Ukrainian regime as a way to eventually build up its fighting strength against Russia. She invokes this reasoning as a way to justify why she objected to Ukraine’s earlier membership of the NATO alliance in 2008. The fact of membership wasn’t wrong, it was just a matter of wrong timing, according to Merkel.
As respected independent military analyst Scott Ritter points out, Merkel also knew that the Kiev regime installed by the CIA-backed coup d’état in 2014 was not interested in a peaceful resolution of the civil war in that country.
The unspoken policy in Berlin was all about buying time for the anticipated aggression against Russia. This was in spite of the fact that Germany along with France was supposed to be a guarantor of the Minsk peace agreements negotiated in 2014 and 2015.
In other words, Ukraine was primed for war against Russia from 2014 onwards.
Merkel’s admission is therefore really a confession of Western duplicity towards Russia, as Ritter astutely notes.
When Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the military intervention into Ukraine on February 24 this year, the order was one of force majeure because the offensive threat from the NATO-backed Kiev regime had crossed Russia’s red lines. Those red lines had been repeatedly conveyed to the West by Moscow to no avail.
Thus, the Western media claims about “Russian aggression” are propaganda laundering about the real causes of and responsibilities for the war.
NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg and other NATO commanders have also admitted on several occasions that the coup in Kiev was followed by massive weaponizing of the regime by the United States and other Western powers.
Washington was pumping billions of dollars worth of weapons into the NeoNazi paramilitary forces between 2014 and 2022. Military trainers from the U.S., Britain, Canada and other NATO members were on the ground in Ukraine preparing their charges even while these forces were shelling and killing Russian people in the Donbass. This wasn’t just happenstance or hapless association. It was a calculated build-up for war.
This pernicious perspective ties in totally with the gloating earlier this year by former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko who said that the Minsk accords were never intended to be implemented but rather were used cynically as a staging post to consolidate offensive forces surreptitiously in order to eventually take the fight to Russia.
Moscow can be criticized on two counts. Arguably, it should have moved at an earlier stage to safeguard the Donbass territories. Waiting eight years to do so has made the task all the more difficult.
Secondly, it is lamentable that Moscow was duped – again – by Western promises. The whole Minsk peace process turned out to be a charade that the Western powers and their Kiev catspaw never respected despite the rhetoric. As it turns out, Russia was the only party that took the Minsk accords seriously. And it has paid a heavy price for buying that."

https://telegra.ph/Merkel-Spills-Beans-on-How-US-and-NATO-Partners-Planned-War-in-Ukraine-Against-Russia-12-09

Safety Concerns re: Covid-19 Vaccinations In Pregnancy
https://www.hartgroup.org/safety-concerns-re-covid-19-vaccinations-in-pregnancy/

This open letter to the president of the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists was filed in mid-November 2022.

Though it’s not “breaking news”, I thought it valuable to know that 70 doctors, mostly of medicine, many of obstetrics and gynaecology, share many of the same concerns I had two years ago, prior to first emergency use authorisation.

It’s still impossible to know what the safety / risk profile is, in relation to pregnancy and foetal development. Please share this with any friends & relatives who are or might be contemplating COVID-19 “vaccination”.

Best wishes
Mike

Grant Wahl, soccer writer, dies (suddenly) after collapsing at World Cup - Los Angeles Times

"Award-winning sportswriter Grant Wahl, best known for his work with Sports Illustrated and Fox Soccer, died after collapsing in the media tribune at Friday’s Argentina-Netherlands World Cup game, U.S. Soccer announced. He was 49.

Paramedics treated Wahl for approximately 30 minutes after his collapse before removing him from the stadium on a stretcher. He was later pronounced dead Saturday morning at a Qatari hospital.

“My body finally broke down on me. Three weeks of little sleep, high stress and lots of work can do that to you,” Wahl wrote. “What had been a cold over the last 10 days turned into something more severe on the night of the USA-Netherlands game, and I could feel my upper chest take on a new level of pressure and discomfort.”
Wahl wrote that he tested negative for COVID-19 and sought treatment for his symptoms.

“I went into the medical clinic at the main media center today, and they said I probably have bronchitis. They gave me a course of antibiotics and some heavy-duty cough syrup, and I’m already feeling a bit better just a few hours later. But still: No bueno,” he wrote"

https://www.latimes.com/sports/soccer/story/2022-12-09/grant-wahl-longtime-soccer-writer-dies-world-cup

"The last time the BBC was here [in Donetsk] was the Spring of 2016" - Donetsk Republic Media Accreditation Chief Angelika Shribitko

The BBC has not been to the main city under shelling in a war it claims to report about for 6 years, yet claims to be an impartial news outlet. Well their claim of impartiality and covering both sides of any story is debunked with facts right there. And where is OFCOM when you need them?

I was moved by Naomi Wolf’s description of the visible attitudes of most Floridians as compared to the people of northeast states & others who endured very extended, cruel lockdowns and coerced injections.
Best wishes
Mike

Thanksgiving in a Victim World. Resuming Our National Holidays After a Mass Violation
https://www.globalresearch.ca/thanksgiving-victim-world-resuming-our-national-holidays-after-mass-violation/5800784

Germany and France must pay compensation to Donbas residents, chairman of Russian State Duma

After former German Chancellor Angela Merkel confessed that the Minsk agreements served as a preparation for Ukraine's combat operations, Germany and France bear moral and material responsibility for what is happening, said Vyacheslav Volodin, chairman of the Russian State Duma.

"They will have to pay compensation to the residents of Donbass for 8 years of genocide and damage caused," Volodin stressed.

Elton John: Why not call for government authorities to engage in a discussion?

If you want to stop misinformation,.. Encouraging debate, as UCSF Professor Vinay Prasad has done, is the most effective approach.

"Elton John is quitting Twitter because he doesn’t want to support a platform that spreads COVID misinformation. This is ironic since Elton John himself is a major COVID misinformation spreader.

Elton claims that vaccination works, but he won’t show us the data. The data shows countries which vaccinate more have higher COVID and all-cause death rates than those countries which avoided vaccination."

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/elton-john-why-not-call-for-government

I found this very interesting. It at least makes an attempt to draw together most of the treads surrounding & underpinnings the covid lies.
From lockdown & masking through censorship & relentless propaganda to the almost overwhelming drumbeat leading up to all but complete insistence on “getting vaccinated”, together with several other threads of events (which are not coincidental) leading us down a path to planned demolition of the modern world, this piece offers, rightly or wrongly, a perspective that holds it all together.
In my view, one striking event doesn’t get the attention it surely deserves, if it’s mentioned at all: climate change.
From quite eariy on in this mass deception of a severe public health emergency, I could tell, by deduction, that what we were being in was a supranationally-led drama. I had no idea how it had been initiated let alone maintained, but that it was coordinated at a level above government was inescapable.
Later, I stumbled upon a crisp TV documentary by Paul Schreyer, entitled “Pandemic Simulations, Preparation For A New Era?” (Still up on YouTube last time I checked). Schreyer used nothing but public sources so you can confirm that events occurred as he described. The motivation behind these rehearsals, as I believe they were that, is less clear, other than to prepare the democratic world to be taken over completely, in the event of a global public health emergency.
Because of this elaborate backdrop, extending over 25 years, I am clear in my own mind that the covid “crisis” was wholly manufactured. I respectfully recognise that not everyone takes the same view. I’m ok with it because none of us has a crystal ball.
Either way, we are where we are, essentially three years into a global coup d’etat.
In actual fact, this series of interlocking coups occurred far earlier than the beginning of 2020. All sorts of political events over that 25 year period are susceptible to being examined in a different light now.
Is this telling of the sweep of history accurate in all particulars? Probably not. Is it broadly correct? I think it is. I’ve seen so many partial histories from very different sources and times & mostly, they fit this overarching narrative.
I remain open to other interpretations while extrapolating forward from this one, because if it’s true, we don’t have the luxury of time to cast about in the dust, trying for other explanations that are less frightening.
I mention “climate change”. I struggle to accept that many, perhaps most people, buy this narrative. But that they undoubtedly do provides a plausible explanation for how it is that so many people have connived with supranational groups and against their own fellow citizens. I can imagine the exchange, in persuading a democratic person that horrible & undemocratic things have to happen. “It’s to save us from ourselves”.
Seen this way provokes a different conclusion than hitherto: it is important to share widely that “The Science” around human made climate change is no better than that surrounding the covid lies.
Best wishes
Mike

Where Did this “New World Order” Coup Come From? The Rockefeller’s “Social Engineering Project”

"The “New World Order” (NWO) is a social engineering project aimed at reshaping human civilization on Planet Earth in its every aspect, to suit the selfish interests of a small group of billionaires obsessed by greed for power and profit. But also – and no less so – obsessed by their fear of violent hungry and deprived masses ransacking and destroying their properties. And eager to display how superior they are to 99.99 % of their fellow humans – and their ability to beat both Nature, the Universe, and Divine Consciousness at the eternal game of Creation."

https://www.globalresearch.ca/where-did-this-new-world-order-coup-come-from-the-rockefellers-social-engineering-project/5801301

This article ends by claiming there was no conspiracy related to Matt Hancock. I wonder, whether once again this is just clever wording. There was no conspiracy involving Matt Hancock for the simple reason that he was never invited to the table of the oligarchy to make any decisions, he was simply given instructions telling him what to do, from colleagues at the WEF, WHO, BMGF and SAGE who were themselves told what to do.

Technically, this is not a conspiracy at the level of Matt Hancock, the conspiracy would only have taken place at a supranational level between a very small group of oligarchs, perhaps all decided between them at Bilderberger and implemented at Davos. Therefore it is clever to try and and claim no conspiracy at the level of national government.

Any government official blindly following WEF diktats is not actively participating at the decision making level of any conspiracy, they are simply doing it to further their political career. The correct term is corruption, moral if not financial, not conspiracy when it comes to the level of government officials.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-truth-about-matt-hancock/

Dr Mike Yeadon: “I Didn’t Do My Homework” — “I’m Ashamed That I Was Pro-Vaccine”

Full video:
➨ https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/dr-mike-yeadon-depopulation

“Refuse genetic vaccines!” urged former Pfizer allergy and respiratory research chief scientist Dr Mike Yeadon.

“I certainly, when I was in [the pharmaceutical] industry, I was pro-vaccine. I would say I now abstain at best. And I'm ashamed that I was pro-vaccine because I didn't do my homework.”

Speaking at WCH General Assembly Meeting #66 on November 21, 2022, Dr Yeadon explained why he believes the depopulation agenda is real and what we can do about it.

He has more than 30 years of experience leading new medicine research in the pharmaceutical industry.

Watch Mike's full presentation here.

Find this video clip to share on Rumble, Bitchute, Gettr, Odysee, TruthSocial, and Minds.

📩 NEWSLETTER | 💪 JOIN US

🌳 https://linktr.ee/worldcouncilforhealth

📌 Follow WCH:
➨ @WCH_org

Hiroyuki Hamada writes: "Who’s afraid of sensitive topics? Who’s afraid of facing facts? Well, we all are to an extent, but it is imperative that we grasp the nature of the circus as it is if we are to confront the system which corners people to play clowns. When we face a crisis, we must ask why and how, quite often we find culprits posing as saviors. Here we go. Aesthetic Resistance podcast #75. John Steppling, Cory Morningstar, Johan Eddebo, Varun Mathur and Hiroyuki Hamada"

https://soundcloud.com/aestheticresistance/podcast-75