UK regulator appoints former Google exec as “Online Safety” head after online censorship bill is reintroduced
"A former Google executive will play a key role in developing new “online safety” rules in the United Kingdom (UK) as a new censorship and surveillance law is expected to come into force.
Gill Whitehead, who was previously a member of Google’s UK Management Group and previously led Google’s consumer and market insights function across several continents, was appointed as the Group Director of Online Safety at the UK communications regulator, Office of Communications (Ofcom), yesterday.
The appointment was announced days after the UK government reintroduced the “Online Safety Bill” — a censorship and surveillance law that will empower Ofcom to levy huge fines against Big Tech firms that fail to enforce the censorship rules in their terms of service consistently.
Whitehead will start leading Ofcom’s Online Safety Group from April 2023 as it starts preparing new rules that will “hold tech firms to account for prioritising their users’ safety.”
Bloomberg reports that Whitehead’s appointment is part of a trend of Ofcom being increasingly led by former Big Tech executives with Whitehead set to work alongside former Amazon and Meta executives"
While the reintroduced Online Safety Bill has dropped some controversial provisions that required platforms to censor “legal but harmful” content, many problematic aspects still remain:
, a new criminal offenses that was introduced in the previous version of the Online Safety Bill — a “false communications” offense which criminalizes sending “information that the person knows to be false” with the intention of causing “psychological harm” to a “likely audience” with “no reasonable excuse” — is still in this version of the bill. Those convicted of a false communications offense can be imprisoned for up to 51 weeks in prison.
the plans to ban private messaging in the UK are still in the Online Safety Bill. A legal analysis that was published last week found that the bill gives the government the right to “impose technologies that would intercept and scan private communications on a mass scale.”
the government press release states that platforms “may have to use age assurance measures” when the Online Safety Bill comes into force. This means that adults could be forced to hand over highly sensitive information, by submitting scans of their identity documents or having their face biometrically scanned, in order to use social media platforms
https://reclaimthenet.org/ofcom-google-exec-online-safety-bill/
"A former Google executive will play a key role in developing new “online safety” rules in the United Kingdom (UK) as a new censorship and surveillance law is expected to come into force.
Gill Whitehead, who was previously a member of Google’s UK Management Group and previously led Google’s consumer and market insights function across several continents, was appointed as the Group Director of Online Safety at the UK communications regulator, Office of Communications (Ofcom), yesterday.
The appointment was announced days after the UK government reintroduced the “Online Safety Bill” — a censorship and surveillance law that will empower Ofcom to levy huge fines against Big Tech firms that fail to enforce the censorship rules in their terms of service consistently.
Whitehead will start leading Ofcom’s Online Safety Group from April 2023 as it starts preparing new rules that will “hold tech firms to account for prioritising their users’ safety.”
Bloomberg reports that Whitehead’s appointment is part of a trend of Ofcom being increasingly led by former Big Tech executives with Whitehead set to work alongside former Amazon and Meta executives"
While the reintroduced Online Safety Bill has dropped some controversial provisions that required platforms to censor “legal but harmful” content, many problematic aspects still remain:
, a new criminal offenses that was introduced in the previous version of the Online Safety Bill — a “false communications” offense which criminalizes sending “information that the person knows to be false” with the intention of causing “psychological harm” to a “likely audience” with “no reasonable excuse” — is still in this version of the bill. Those convicted of a false communications offense can be imprisoned for up to 51 weeks in prison.
the plans to ban private messaging in the UK are still in the Online Safety Bill. A legal analysis that was published last week found that the bill gives the government the right to “impose technologies that would intercept and scan private communications on a mass scale.”
the government press release states that platforms “may have to use age assurance measures” when the Online Safety Bill comes into force. This means that adults could be forced to hand over highly sensitive information, by submitting scans of their identity documents or having their face biometrically scanned, in order to use social media platforms
https://reclaimthenet.org/ofcom-google-exec-online-safety-bill/
Reclaim The Net
UK regulator appoints former Google exec as “Online Safety” head after online censorship bill is reintroduced
Helping the state enforce its new censorship law.
I don’t claim to have unique insights here. I don’t. But I do think I can see ways in which the perpetrators might play out their not inconsiderable hand.
Part of seeing past the curtain & know - for sure - that they’re lying to us all, please pay attention to the key lies.
Vaccination was a known unsuccessful strategy given the claimed profile of the vulnerable.
The next lie is they’re going to do it again. They always tell us. Recall Gates “In Pandemic 2 - I call this Pandemic 1….”
Well, now. I will illustrate why there aren’t any pandemics of severe respiratory illnesses. All lies.
Finally, the madness of centralizing power at the corrupt WHO, I explain why it will definitely result in suboptimal outcomes, even if they were earnest and honest.
If you find ANY of the arguments convincing, please help by sharing them with other people.
The evil perpetrators will succeed only with our assent. They’ll have it passively or actively. Let’s deny them both ways.
Never bow your head. Never.
Best wishes
Mike
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/america-out-loud-podcast-network/id1082235261?i=1000588255795
Part of seeing past the curtain & know - for sure - that they’re lying to us all, please pay attention to the key lies.
Vaccination was a known unsuccessful strategy given the claimed profile of the vulnerable.
The next lie is they’re going to do it again. They always tell us. Recall Gates “In Pandemic 2 - I call this Pandemic 1….”
Well, now. I will illustrate why there aren’t any pandemics of severe respiratory illnesses. All lies.
Finally, the madness of centralizing power at the corrupt WHO, I explain why it will definitely result in suboptimal outcomes, even if they were earnest and honest.
If you find ANY of the arguments convincing, please help by sharing them with other people.
The evil perpetrators will succeed only with our assent. They’ll have it passively or actively. Let’s deny them both ways.
Never bow your head. Never.
Best wishes
Mike
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/america-out-loud-podcast-network/id1082235261?i=1000588255795
Apple Podcasts
AMERICA OUT LOUD PODCAST NETWORK on Apple Podcasts
News · 2023
If this is true, I don’t care what the earth laws are, this is intolerable. No single entity may hold this much power over a planet.
https://strangesounds.org/2022/03/warning-bill-gates-has-taken-control-of-the-global-production-and-warehousing-of-seeds.html
https://strangesounds.org/2022/03/warning-bill-gates-has-taken-control-of-the-global-production-and-warehousing-of-seeds.html
Strange Sounds
Warning: Bill Gates has taken control of the global production and warehousing of seeds - Strange Sounds
Bill Gates is not only owning the most farmland in America… He has also taken control of the global production and warehousing of seeds… Since the onset of the Neolithic Revolution some 10.000 years ago, farmers and communities have worked to improve yield…
👍2
TEN PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Statement on the Ethical Principles of Public Health | Hillsdale in D.C.
Ethical Principles of Public Health
1. All public health advice should consider the impact on overall health, rather than solely be concerned with a single disease. It should always consider both benefits and harms from public health measures and weigh short-term gains against long-term harms.
2. Public health is about everyone. Any public health policy must first and foremost protect society's most vulnerable, including children, low-income families, persons with disabilities and the elderly. It should never shift the burden of disease from the affluent to the less affluent.
3. Public health advice should be adapted to the needs of each population, within cultural, religious, geographic, and other contexts.
4. Public health is about comparative risk evaluations, risk reduction, and reducing uncertainties using the best available evidence, since risk usually cannot be entirely eliminated.
5. Public health requires public trust. Public health recommendations should present facts as the basis for guidance, and never employ fear or shame to sway or manipulate the public.
6. Medical interventions should not be forced or coerced upon a population, but rather should be voluntary and based on informed consent. Public health officials are advisors, not rule setters, and provide information and resources for individuals to make informed decisions.
7. Public health authorities must be honest and transparent, both with what is known and what is not known. Advice should be evidence-based and explained by data, and authorities must acknowledge errors or changes in evidence as soon as they are made aware of them..
8. Public health scientists and practitioners should avoid conflicts-of-interest, and any unavoidable conflicts-of-interest must be clearly stated.
9. In public health, open civilized debate is profoundly important. It is unacceptable for public health professionals to censor, silence or intimidate members of the public or other public health scientists or practitioners.
10. It is critical for public health scientists and practitioners always to listen to the public, who are living the public health consequences of public health decisions, and to adapt appropriately.
https://dc.hillsdale.edu/Academy-for-Science-and-Freedom/The-Ethical-Principles-of-Public-Health/
Statement on the Ethical Principles of Public Health | Hillsdale in D.C.
Ethical Principles of Public Health
1. All public health advice should consider the impact on overall health, rather than solely be concerned with a single disease. It should always consider both benefits and harms from public health measures and weigh short-term gains against long-term harms.
2. Public health is about everyone. Any public health policy must first and foremost protect society's most vulnerable, including children, low-income families, persons with disabilities and the elderly. It should never shift the burden of disease from the affluent to the less affluent.
3. Public health advice should be adapted to the needs of each population, within cultural, religious, geographic, and other contexts.
4. Public health is about comparative risk evaluations, risk reduction, and reducing uncertainties using the best available evidence, since risk usually cannot be entirely eliminated.
5. Public health requires public trust. Public health recommendations should present facts as the basis for guidance, and never employ fear or shame to sway or manipulate the public.
6. Medical interventions should not be forced or coerced upon a population, but rather should be voluntary and based on informed consent. Public health officials are advisors, not rule setters, and provide information and resources for individuals to make informed decisions.
7. Public health authorities must be honest and transparent, both with what is known and what is not known. Advice should be evidence-based and explained by data, and authorities must acknowledge errors or changes in evidence as soon as they are made aware of them..
8. Public health scientists and practitioners should avoid conflicts-of-interest, and any unavoidable conflicts-of-interest must be clearly stated.
9. In public health, open civilized debate is profoundly important. It is unacceptable for public health professionals to censor, silence or intimidate members of the public or other public health scientists or practitioners.
10. It is critical for public health scientists and practitioners always to listen to the public, who are living the public health consequences of public health decisions, and to adapt appropriately.
https://dc.hillsdale.edu/Academy-for-Science-and-Freedom/The-Ethical-Principles-of-Public-Health/
👍5🔥1
This research is almost one year old
Yet nothing has been done
Robin
New‐onset autoimmune phenomena post‐COVID‐19 vaccination - Chen - 2022 - Immunology - Wiley Online Library
"Recently, new-onset autoimmune phenomena after COVID-19 vaccination have been reported increasingly (e.g. immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, autoimmune liver diseases, Guillain-Barré syndrome, IgA nephropathy, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus). Molecular mimicry, the production of particular autoantibodies and the role of certain vaccine adjuvants seem to be substantial contributors to autoimmune phenomena"
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imm.13443
Yet nothing has been done
Robin
New‐onset autoimmune phenomena post‐COVID‐19 vaccination - Chen - 2022 - Immunology - Wiley Online Library
"Recently, new-onset autoimmune phenomena after COVID-19 vaccination have been reported increasingly (e.g. immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, autoimmune liver diseases, Guillain-Barré syndrome, IgA nephropathy, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus). Molecular mimicry, the production of particular autoantibodies and the role of certain vaccine adjuvants seem to be substantial contributors to autoimmune phenomena"
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imm.13443
Wiley Online Library
New‐onset autoimmune phenomena post‐COVID‐19 vaccination
As vaccination programmes are being rolled out globally, new-onset autoimmune phenomena are emerging after COVID-19 vaccination (e.g. immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, autoimmune liver diseases, Gu...
👍1
Further anecdotal but upsettingly compelling evidence of harms to babies born to c19 vaccinated injections.
https://truth613.substack.com/p/part-3-they-told-you-it-was-safe
A much longer list of sick babies than usual, by a wide margin.
Birth defects involving missing limbs are so prevalent & unexpected that a new support organization has just been initiated.
Please do share. Obviously, I know this isn’t important to access to public parks. Yet I’ve heard that from a number of sources.
Best wishes
Mike
https://truth613.substack.com/p/part-3-they-told-you-it-was-safe
A much longer list of sick babies than usual, by a wide margin.
Birth defects involving missing limbs are so prevalent & unexpected that a new support organization has just been initiated.
Please do share. Obviously, I know this isn’t important to access to public parks. Yet I’ve heard that from a number of sources.
Best wishes
Mike
In G-d’s Army There’s Only Truth
Part 3: They TOLD you it was safe in pregnancy! Newborn birth defects, miscarriages & stillbirths
Personal story, shocking community birth defect rates, and whistleblower testimony.
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
NEW - Britain sleepwalking into a censorship system far harsher than anything that the EU or the US is proposing.
"Britain would end up with one of the most draconian regimes in the free world."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/12/01/britain-sleepwalking-censorship-running-time-stop/
@disclosetv
"Britain would end up with one of the most draconian regimes in the free world."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/12/01/britain-sleepwalking-censorship-running-time-stop/
@disclosetv
The Telegraph
Britain is sleepwalking into censorship and we’re running out of time to stop it
The revised Online Safety Bill still incentivises Big Tech to turn its algorithms against legal speech
Forwarded from NVIC.org
Big Pharma Pays Media Police to Keep You From the Truth
They pose as a policeman of truth, ready to eradicate fake news - but the fox is guarding the henhouse. Just 'follow the money' to discover the hidden truth.
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/12/01/publicis-funds-newsguard.aspx
They pose as a policeman of truth, ready to eradicate fake news - but the fox is guarding the henhouse. Just 'follow the money' to discover the hidden truth.
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/12/01/publicis-funds-newsguard.aspx
Mercola
Archived Article Notice
The article you are looking for has been archived in Dr. Mercola's Censored Library on Substack.
👍2
The Peoples’ Proclamation
Here is a people’s declaration against that awful Bali declaration of intent to tie us to vaccine passports for international travel.
If you allow this to happen, I’m absolutely certain it’ll become required for national travel. I’m afraid I’ve been right since June 2020, when I told my family that this is going to evolve to the point you will require a valid digital pass to move around. They pooh poohed it. Not now. There wasn’t any other plausible explanation & destination, based on locking down much of the world for no useful reason, which I knew to be the case based on first principles, which remained valid.
So, this is coming unless each & every one of us struggles against it.
By signing, you show others that they’re not alone. I find that very encouraging. Then you can share it with lots of other people, some of whom will read it, many won’t.
It’s an attritional campaign.
Please join humanities' struggle to remain free.
Best wishes
Mike
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/proclamation/
Here is a people’s declaration against that awful Bali declaration of intent to tie us to vaccine passports for international travel.
If you allow this to happen, I’m absolutely certain it’ll become required for national travel. I’m afraid I’ve been right since June 2020, when I told my family that this is going to evolve to the point you will require a valid digital pass to move around. They pooh poohed it. Not now. There wasn’t any other plausible explanation & destination, based on locking down much of the world for no useful reason, which I knew to be the case based on first principles, which remained valid.
So, this is coming unless each & every one of us struggles against it.
By signing, you show others that they’re not alone. I find that very encouraging. Then you can share it with lots of other people, some of whom will read it, many won’t.
It’s an attritional campaign.
Please join humanities' struggle to remain free.
Best wishes
Mike
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/proclamation/
Health Freedom Defense Fund
The Peoples’ Proclamation
Please add your name!
👍10❤2👏1
Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar pinned «TEN PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC HEALTH Statement on the Ethical Principles of Public Health | Hillsdale in D.C. Ethical Principles of Public Health 1. All public health advice should consider the impact on overall health, rather than solely be concerned with…»
Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar pinned «The Peoples’ Proclamation Here is a people’s declaration against that awful Bali declaration of intent to tie us to vaccine passports for international travel. If you allow this to happen, I’m absolutely certain it’ll become required for national travel.…»
Forwarded from HART
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Thanks to MP Rebecca Long Bailey for raising these critical questions in parliament
The claim that myocarditis affects 'only' 1 in 30K is not accurate. Canada cites 1 in 3K in 18-24 males
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2793551
Damage to heart tissue is permanent & is certainly not a 'very minor issue'
This needs serious scrutiny and a halt to roll-out whilst investigated. Moderna dose 2 shows 300 cases per million, or 1 in 3333
The precautionary principle has not been followed
'Hoping' that these side effects aren't serious and ongoing in young people who never needed this intervention is simply not good enough
The claim that myocarditis affects 'only' 1 in 30K is not accurate. Canada cites 1 in 3K in 18-24 males
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2793551
Damage to heart tissue is permanent & is certainly not a 'very minor issue'
This needs serious scrutiny and a halt to roll-out whilst investigated. Moderna dose 2 shows 300 cases per million, or 1 in 3333
The precautionary principle has not been followed
'Hoping' that these side effects aren't serious and ongoing in young people who never needed this intervention is simply not good enough
Temporary mild damage to heart muscle cells after Covid-19 booster vaccination
"An interdisciplinary research team from the University of Basel and the University Hospital Basel has studied the effects of the Covid-19 booster vaccination on the heart muscle. According to their findings, which have not yet been peer-reviewed, mild damage is more common than previously thought. Cardiologist Professor Christian Müller talks about the results in an interview.
In our study, we found evidence of temporary mild damage to cardiac cells in 22 of the 777 participants - 2.8% instead of the anticipated 0.0035%. So there’s slight damage to heart muscle cells in almost 3% of the cases, which shouldn’t be overestimated, but also not ignored.
According to current knowledge, the cardiac muscle can’t regenerate, or only to a very limited degree at best. So it’s possible that repeated booster vaccinations every year could cause moderate damage to the heart muscle cells."
https://www.unibas.ch/en/News-Events/News/Uni-Research/Temporary-mild-damage-to-heart-muscle-cells-after-Covid-19-booster-vaccination.html
"An interdisciplinary research team from the University of Basel and the University Hospital Basel has studied the effects of the Covid-19 booster vaccination on the heart muscle. According to their findings, which have not yet been peer-reviewed, mild damage is more common than previously thought. Cardiologist Professor Christian Müller talks about the results in an interview.
In our study, we found evidence of temporary mild damage to cardiac cells in 22 of the 777 participants - 2.8% instead of the anticipated 0.0035%. So there’s slight damage to heart muscle cells in almost 3% of the cases, which shouldn’t be overestimated, but also not ignored.
According to current knowledge, the cardiac muscle can’t regenerate, or only to a very limited degree at best. So it’s possible that repeated booster vaccinations every year could cause moderate damage to the heart muscle cells."
https://www.unibas.ch/en/News-Events/News/Uni-Research/Temporary-mild-damage-to-heart-muscle-cells-after-Covid-19-booster-vaccination.html
www.unibas.ch
Temporary mild damage to heart muscle cells after Covid-19 booster vaccination
An interdisciplinary research team from the University of Basel and the University Hospital Basel has studied the effects of the Covid-19 booster vaccination on the heart muscle. According to their findings, which have not yet been peer-reviewed, mild damage…
Forwarded from G3 News
Rising Cost Of European Energy Makes EV Battery Plants "Unfeasible", VW Exec Says
We've already written this month about how the "tax break" incentive to buy an EV is starting to vaporize into thin air in places like Japan and the U.K.. Now, the irony continues, as rising costs of energy in Europe, helped along by "green" energy policies, are making industrial projects like battery cell factories "unfeasible".
Volkswagen brand CEO Thomas Schaefer said this week that investments in German and EU projects will no longer make financial sense if "policy makers fail to control ballooning energy prices in the long-term", according to the Times.
In a post on LinkedIn, Schaefer said: “Unless we manage to reduce energy prices in Germany and Europe quickly and reliably, investments in energy-intensive production or new battery cell factories in Germany and the EU will be practically unviable. The value creation in this area will take place elsewhere.”
Last week, French and German economy ministers proposed an outline for policy cooperation that Schaefer claims “falls short in crucial areas and does not address the envisaged priorities”, the report says.
“Outdated and bureaucratic state-aid rules” fail to focus enough on “the short-term ramp-up, scaling and industrialisation of production," he said.
The report says that EU officials are focused on responding to President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, which they say "violates World Trade Organisation rules and discriminates against non-US companies."
Meanwhile, Volkswagen is in the process of putting 6 battery factories in operation across Europe by the year 2030, the report says. The company's lead plant in Germany broke ground this July and already has a €3bn (R53bn) joint venture with Umicore in place for cathode material production.
Recall, just days ago, we reported that the UK was looking to raise more tax revenue from electric vehicles, shattering the years-long assumption that if you contributed to "helping the environment" by buying an EV, you'd be entitled to subsidies and tax credits.
Now Japan's internal affairs ministry is reportedly weighing whether or not to raise taxes on electric vehicles in order to make up for a shortfall in income from taxes on traditional gas powered cars.
And so it's turning out that the economics of an industry pivot set into motion almost solely due to government subsidization may not entirely make sense. Who would have figured?
Source: Zerohedge
Join us on Minds!
Follow:👇
@G3News
We've already written this month about how the "tax break" incentive to buy an EV is starting to vaporize into thin air in places like Japan and the U.K.. Now, the irony continues, as rising costs of energy in Europe, helped along by "green" energy policies, are making industrial projects like battery cell factories "unfeasible".
Volkswagen brand CEO Thomas Schaefer said this week that investments in German and EU projects will no longer make financial sense if "policy makers fail to control ballooning energy prices in the long-term", according to the Times.
In a post on LinkedIn, Schaefer said: “Unless we manage to reduce energy prices in Germany and Europe quickly and reliably, investments in energy-intensive production or new battery cell factories in Germany and the EU will be practically unviable. The value creation in this area will take place elsewhere.”
Last week, French and German economy ministers proposed an outline for policy cooperation that Schaefer claims “falls short in crucial areas and does not address the envisaged priorities”, the report says.
“Outdated and bureaucratic state-aid rules” fail to focus enough on “the short-term ramp-up, scaling and industrialisation of production," he said.
The report says that EU officials are focused on responding to President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, which they say "violates World Trade Organisation rules and discriminates against non-US companies."
Meanwhile, Volkswagen is in the process of putting 6 battery factories in operation across Europe by the year 2030, the report says. The company's lead plant in Germany broke ground this July and already has a €3bn (R53bn) joint venture with Umicore in place for cathode material production.
Recall, just days ago, we reported that the UK was looking to raise more tax revenue from electric vehicles, shattering the years-long assumption that if you contributed to "helping the environment" by buying an EV, you'd be entitled to subsidies and tax credits.
Now Japan's internal affairs ministry is reportedly weighing whether or not to raise taxes on electric vehicles in order to make up for a shortfall in income from taxes on traditional gas powered cars.
And so it's turning out that the economics of an industry pivot set into motion almost solely due to government subsidization may not entirely make sense. Who would have figured?
Source: Zerohedge
Join us on Minds!
Follow:👇
@G3News
👍3
Forwarded from Dr Tess Lawrie
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
No more boosters, says top cancer doctor
➨ https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/no-more-boosters-says-top-cancer
A very important Tess Talks coming up this Sunday—one that I hope will convince even the most avid believers in the Covid narrative to think twice before getting any more Covid shots.
Professor Angus Dalgleish MD FRACP FRCP FRCPath FMedSci, is Professor of Oncology at St George’s University of London—and a conscientious man. Last week, he wrote to Dr Kamran Abbasi, Editor-in-Chief of the BMJ, expressing his grave concerns regarding Covid vaccine harms and calling for an end to the vaccine programme. You can read his letter here.
This is by no means the first time Professor Dalgleish has raised the alarm.
It just never made any sense to this cancer specialist who has extensive experience in immunology and vaccine development as well. Now, treating cancer patients at the frontline, he is shocked and dismayed by what he is seeing—and not just in his patients but in relatives and friends too. This includes rapidly growing and fulminating cancers, recurrences among people long cured or in remission from their cancers which, in some instances, had been gone 25 years or more. These cancers are occurring among vaccinated individuals, and in Professor Dalgleish’s opinion are being triggered by the booster injections.
In this conversation, we discuss the reasons why doctors are not speaking out and their role in preventing people making sense of the risks with these novel injections. We also discuss the suppression of research on cheap established and generic medicines for which returns are modest—in the quest for novel pharma drugs and ever more profit.
I urge you to tune in this Sunday to listen to what Professor Angus Dalgleish has to say. Tune in, and please share. If this doesn’t stop people from getting boosted, I don’t know what will.
📌 Follow Me:
➨ @DrTessLawrie
➨ https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/no-more-boosters-says-top-cancer
A very important Tess Talks coming up this Sunday—one that I hope will convince even the most avid believers in the Covid narrative to think twice before getting any more Covid shots.
Professor Angus Dalgleish MD FRACP FRCP FRCPath FMedSci, is Professor of Oncology at St George’s University of London—and a conscientious man. Last week, he wrote to Dr Kamran Abbasi, Editor-in-Chief of the BMJ, expressing his grave concerns regarding Covid vaccine harms and calling for an end to the vaccine programme. You can read his letter here.
This is by no means the first time Professor Dalgleish has raised the alarm.
It just never made any sense to this cancer specialist who has extensive experience in immunology and vaccine development as well. Now, treating cancer patients at the frontline, he is shocked and dismayed by what he is seeing—and not just in his patients but in relatives and friends too. This includes rapidly growing and fulminating cancers, recurrences among people long cured or in remission from their cancers which, in some instances, had been gone 25 years or more. These cancers are occurring among vaccinated individuals, and in Professor Dalgleish’s opinion are being triggered by the booster injections.
In this conversation, we discuss the reasons why doctors are not speaking out and their role in preventing people making sense of the risks with these novel injections. We also discuss the suppression of research on cheap established and generic medicines for which returns are modest—in the quest for novel pharma drugs and ever more profit.
I urge you to tune in this Sunday to listen to what Professor Angus Dalgleish has to say. Tune in, and please share. If this doesn’t stop people from getting boosted, I don’t know what will.
📌 Follow Me:
➨ @DrTessLawrie
👍1
Forwarded from The Vigilant Fox 🦊
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Biden's Booster Investment Goes Down the Toilet as Americans Reject New C19 Shots
Here are the headlines:
"Biden wastes billions on COVID boosters no one wants" — New York Post
"Biden administration announces push to improve COVID booster uptake" — CIDRAP
Just over 11% of eligible people, ages five and older, have received a new booster, according to the latest data from the CDC.
Full Episode: https://thehighwire.com/
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
Rumble | Substack | Support | Socials
Here are the headlines:
"Biden wastes billions on COVID boosters no one wants" — New York Post
"Biden administration announces push to improve COVID booster uptake" — CIDRAP
Just over 11% of eligible people, ages five and older, have received a new booster, according to the latest data from the CDC.
Full Episode: https://thehighwire.com/
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
Rumble | Substack | Support | Socials
👍1
Forwarded from HATS 🎩
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
George Clooney supporting mandatory Convid vaccinations for children.
@HATSTRUTH 🎩
@HATSTRUTH 🎩
🤬2👍1
George Clooney is more than welcome to have as many boosters as he likes, if that is his "informed" choice..
https://www.weforum.org/people/george-clooney
https://www.weforum.org/people/george-clooney
World Economic Forum
George Clooney
Actor, film director, producer, and screenwriter. Since 2008, United Nations Messenger of Peace. Humanitarian work includes advocacy of finding a resolution for the Darfur conflict, raising funds for the 2010 Haiti earthquake, 2004 Tsunami, and 9/11 victims…