ASPIRIN. NOT MRNA INJECTIONS
Aspirin Use Is Associated With Decreased Mechanical Ventilation, Intensive Care Unit Admission, and In-Hospital Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019
https://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Fulltext/2021/04000/Aspirin_Use_Is_Associated_With_Decreased.2.aspx
Aspirin Use Is Associated With Decreased Mechanical Ventilation, Intensive Care Unit Admission, and In-Hospital Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019
https://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Fulltext/2021/04000/Aspirin_Use_Is_Associated_With_Decreased.2.aspx
Forwarded from Deleted Account
"Dear Halle residents,
We are again increasingly concerned with the incidence of infections in the clinics, currently in Bergmannstrost, in the University Clinic and in the Elisabeth Hospital.
The medical director of the Elisabeth Hospital, Dr. Liedtke, told us from the clinic the case of a person who had received both vaccinations, had come to the clinic completely symptom-free and was also negative in the rapid test.
In the end, however, a PCR test revealed an enormously high viral load in this person, so that the person may have become a super spreader completely unknowingly.
Dr. Liedtke literally described the case to us as follows: “The virus apparently has a new strategy and bypasses all defensive measures that we have had so far. This is a completely new situation. "
Super spreader after vaccination? Borssche warned the WHO about this
Geert Vanden Bossche already warned the WHO about the super spreader problem . Bossche worked in the field of infection research and vaccine development for the pharmaceutical companies Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline as well as for the organization GAVI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Vaccinating people against the corona virus in the middle of a pandemic will, in his view, make the virus more contagious.
This will also increase the resistance of the viruses to the vaccines. In addition, according to Bossche, the mass vaccination against the corona virus “will most likely further intensify the adaptive immune escape, since none of the current vaccines prevent the transmission of the viral variants.” An immune escape means that a mutated virus outwits the innate immunity of the body."
https://www.epochtimes.de/politik/deutschland/ein-voellig-seltsamer-fall-in-halle-super-spreader-nach-impfung-a3482873.html
We are again increasingly concerned with the incidence of infections in the clinics, currently in Bergmannstrost, in the University Clinic and in the Elisabeth Hospital.
The medical director of the Elisabeth Hospital, Dr. Liedtke, told us from the clinic the case of a person who had received both vaccinations, had come to the clinic completely symptom-free and was also negative in the rapid test.
In the end, however, a PCR test revealed an enormously high viral load in this person, so that the person may have become a super spreader completely unknowingly.
Dr. Liedtke literally described the case to us as follows: “The virus apparently has a new strategy and bypasses all defensive measures that we have had so far. This is a completely new situation. "
Super spreader after vaccination? Borssche warned the WHO about this
Geert Vanden Bossche already warned the WHO about the super spreader problem . Bossche worked in the field of infection research and vaccine development for the pharmaceutical companies Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline as well as for the organization GAVI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Vaccinating people against the corona virus in the middle of a pandemic will, in his view, make the virus more contagious.
This will also increase the resistance of the viruses to the vaccines. In addition, according to Bossche, the mass vaccination against the corona virus “will most likely further intensify the adaptive immune escape, since none of the current vaccines prevent the transmission of the viral variants.” An immune escape means that a mutated virus outwits the innate immunity of the body."
https://www.epochtimes.de/politik/deutschland/ein-voellig-seltsamer-fall-in-halle-super-spreader-nach-impfung-a3482873.html
The Epoch Times
Ein völlig seltsamer Fall in Halle: Super-Spreader nach Impfung?
In einem Krankenhaus in Halle an der Saale gibt es seit dem 30. März eine völlig neue Situation. "Das Virus hat offenbar eine neue Strategie", erklärt der ärztliche Direktor des Elisabeth-Krankenhauses, Dr. Liedtke. Es umschiffe alle Abwehrmaßnahmen, die…
⬆️ So what is it, are the "vaccine passports" to be renamed "superspreader passports"?
⬆️ Would the vaccinated arguing for vaccine passports still agree now that it transpires they are the potential superspreaders?
Forwarded from Oskar
Vienna Administrative Court: Corona policy without basis, PCR test unsuitable
On March 24, the Vienna Administrative Court ruled on an appeal by the FPÖ against what it considered a grossly illegal ban on a registered rally. In its ruling, the court tore apart the Corona policy of the Turquoise-Green federal government. Citing internationally recognized experts, studies and the World Health Organization, the court found that Anschober's disease definitions were wrong and that a PCR test for Covid-19 diagnostics was unsuitable.
A verdict that all of Austria, and perhaps the whole world, has been waiting for for more than a year. At last, a court has looked at the shaky foundations on which the Corona policy, which claims a dangerous global pandemic, rests. Only recently, renowned professor John Ioannidis found that the mortality from SARS-CoV-19 infection is only 0.15 percent - exactly the same as that from the annual flu. During the alleged pandemic, about as many people appear to have contracted covid-19 as would otherwise have contracted the flu - while there are supposedly no or hardly any flu cases worldwide. This is giving more and more people pause for thought.
Definition of disease completely wrong
The Vienna Administrative Court took a close look at the basis for the Austrian federal government's hysteria policy and found that the definition of illness by Health Minister Anschober alone is completely wrong and baseless.
Assuming the definitions of the Minister of Health, "Case Definition Covid-19" dated 23/12/2020, a "confirmed case" is 1) any person with detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific nucleic acid (PCR test, note), regardless of clinical manifestation or 2) any person, with detection of SARS-CoV specific antigen, who meets the clinical criteria or 3) any person, with detection of SARS-CoV specific antigen, who meets the epidemiological criteria. Thus, none of the three "confirmed cases" defined by the Minister of Health meet the requirements of the WHO term "ill/infected person." The sole reliance on the PCR test (confirmed case 1) is rejected by WHO (...).
If we lived in a democracy, this verdict would change everything. All measures would have to be revoked immediately, the entire federal government would have to resign and would have to be legally prosecuted for the senseless destruction of countless livelihoods.
An equally memorable quote, which shows in what dimensions politics but also the bought media have deceived the public in the past year:
In it, the Public Health Service of the City of Vienna uses the words "case numbers," "test results," "case incidence," and "number of infections." This confusion of terms does not do justice to a scientific assessment of the epidemic situation. (...) For the WHO, the decisive factor is the number of infections/illnesses and not the number of people tested positive or other "case numbers".
As a basis for the medical part of the judgment, the court drew on the following:
WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/05, Nucleic acid testinq (NAT) technoloqies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2, 20 January 2021.
2020 study (Bullard, J., Dust, K., Funk, D., Strong, J. E., Alexander, D., Garnett, L., & Poliquin, G. (2020). Predicting infectious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from diagnostic samples. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 7j(10), 2663-2666.)
Dr. Cary Mullis (inventor of the PCR test): "... that a PCR test is not diagnostic and, therefore, by itself does not reveal anything about a person's disease or infection."
The court states that a physician alone is entitled to determine whether a person is sick or healthy (2 para. 2 Z 1 and 2 Ärztegesetz1998, BGBI. I. No. 169/1998 as amended by BGBI. I No. 31/2021).
The extreme error-proneness of the antigen tests is also mentioned and it is criticized that the Corona Commission would rely exclusively on such antigen tests for current analyses. This small piece of information alone is a political bombshell.
On March 24, the Vienna Administrative Court ruled on an appeal by the FPÖ against what it considered a grossly illegal ban on a registered rally. In its ruling, the court tore apart the Corona policy of the Turquoise-Green federal government. Citing internationally recognized experts, studies and the World Health Organization, the court found that Anschober's disease definitions were wrong and that a PCR test for Covid-19 diagnostics was unsuitable.
A verdict that all of Austria, and perhaps the whole world, has been waiting for for more than a year. At last, a court has looked at the shaky foundations on which the Corona policy, which claims a dangerous global pandemic, rests. Only recently, renowned professor John Ioannidis found that the mortality from SARS-CoV-19 infection is only 0.15 percent - exactly the same as that from the annual flu. During the alleged pandemic, about as many people appear to have contracted covid-19 as would otherwise have contracted the flu - while there are supposedly no or hardly any flu cases worldwide. This is giving more and more people pause for thought.
Definition of disease completely wrong
The Vienna Administrative Court took a close look at the basis for the Austrian federal government's hysteria policy and found that the definition of illness by Health Minister Anschober alone is completely wrong and baseless.
Assuming the definitions of the Minister of Health, "Case Definition Covid-19" dated 23/12/2020, a "confirmed case" is 1) any person with detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific nucleic acid (PCR test, note), regardless of clinical manifestation or 2) any person, with detection of SARS-CoV specific antigen, who meets the clinical criteria or 3) any person, with detection of SARS-CoV specific antigen, who meets the epidemiological criteria. Thus, none of the three "confirmed cases" defined by the Minister of Health meet the requirements of the WHO term "ill/infected person." The sole reliance on the PCR test (confirmed case 1) is rejected by WHO (...).
If we lived in a democracy, this verdict would change everything. All measures would have to be revoked immediately, the entire federal government would have to resign and would have to be legally prosecuted for the senseless destruction of countless livelihoods.
An equally memorable quote, which shows in what dimensions politics but also the bought media have deceived the public in the past year:
In it, the Public Health Service of the City of Vienna uses the words "case numbers," "test results," "case incidence," and "number of infections." This confusion of terms does not do justice to a scientific assessment of the epidemic situation. (...) For the WHO, the decisive factor is the number of infections/illnesses and not the number of people tested positive or other "case numbers".
As a basis for the medical part of the judgment, the court drew on the following:
WHO Information Notice for IVD Users 2020/05, Nucleic acid testinq (NAT) technoloqies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2, 20 January 2021.
2020 study (Bullard, J., Dust, K., Funk, D., Strong, J. E., Alexander, D., Garnett, L., & Poliquin, G. (2020). Predicting infectious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from diagnostic samples. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 7j(10), 2663-2666.)
Dr. Cary Mullis (inventor of the PCR test): "... that a PCR test is not diagnostic and, therefore, by itself does not reveal anything about a person's disease or infection."
The court states that a physician alone is entitled to determine whether a person is sick or healthy (2 para. 2 Z 1 and 2 Ärztegesetz1998, BGBI. I. No. 169/1998 as amended by BGBI. I No. 31/2021).
The extreme error-proneness of the antigen tests is also mentioned and it is criticized that the Corona Commission would rely exclusively on such antigen tests for current analyses. This small piece of information alone is a political bombshell.
👍2
Forwarded from Oskar
If the Corona Commission should have used the case definition of the Minister of Health and not that of the WHO; any determination of the numbers of "sick/infected" is wrong.
The ruling can still be appealed to the Constitutional Court or an extraordinary appeal can be lodged with the Administrative Court.
Source [GERMAN]: https://report24.news/verwaltungsgericht-wien-anschobers-corona-politik-ohne-basis-pcr-test-ungeeignet/
Google-Translate-Link: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Freport24.news%2Fverwaltungsgericht-wien-anschobers-corona-politik-ohne-basis-pcr-test-ungeeignet%2F
The ruling can still be appealed to the Constitutional Court or an extraordinary appeal can be lodged with the Administrative Court.
Source [GERMAN]: https://report24.news/verwaltungsgericht-wien-anschobers-corona-politik-ohne-basis-pcr-test-ungeeignet/
Google-Translate-Link: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Freport24.news%2Fverwaltungsgericht-wien-anschobers-corona-politik-ohne-basis-pcr-test-ungeeignet%2F
Report24
Verwaltungsgericht Wien: Corona-Politik ohne Basis, PCR-Test ungeeignet
Wenn dieses Gerichtsurteil keine weitreichenden Folgen hat, sind der Rechtsstaat und die Demokratie in Österreich tot. Die gesamte Corona-Politik der Regierung wurde sachlich widerlegt.
Two sisters at Villa Hills monastery die from COVID-19 after 28 test positive
"We were very shocked by it because we’ve been extremely closed-down. We have not gone anywhere to speak of, and we haven’t had visitors,” said Sub Prioress Nancy Kordenbrock.
| WKRC
https://local12.com/news/local/two-sisters-at-villa-hills-monastery-die-from-covid-19-after-28-test-positive-cincinnati
"We were very shocked by it because we’ve been extremely closed-down. We have not gone anywhere to speak of, and we haven’t had visitors,” said Sub Prioress Nancy Kordenbrock.
| WKRC
https://local12.com/news/local/two-sisters-at-villa-hills-monastery-die-from-covid-19-after-28-test-positive-cincinnati
WKRC
Two sisters at Villa Hills monastery die from COVID-19 after 28 test positive
VILLA HILLS, Ky. (WKRC) - A COVID-19 outbreak at a Northern Kentucky monastery claimed the lives of two nuns as more than two dozen other sisters tested positive. The question is: How did the coronavirus get in? During the pandemic, the sisters of St. Walburg…
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Talking about Carlo Brogna et al's study which you can find here: https://zenodo.org/record/4088208#.YGRIdk8XadN
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
I’ve been contacted by any number of people, telling me they feel intense pressure to get vaccinated, even though they know there’s no medical reason for it. They feel they won’t get their lives back if they don’t.
I say, that’s the feeling they want you to have. I’m asking you to accept those restrictions for a while. If enough people do that, the vaccine passports plan cannot be introduced.
If you give in, on grounds you want your freedoms back, ask yourself, what kind of people want you to accept a medical treatment you don’t need & which might kill you, just to get crumbs from their table?
They’re the sort of people who regard ordinary humans as viruses or cancer.
Accepting unnecessary vaccination won’t give you freedom, but it will assist in enabling the biggest genocide in history.
But it’s your call. Only you can decide it.
Mike
I say, that’s the feeling they want you to have. I’m asking you to accept those restrictions for a while. If enough people do that, the vaccine passports plan cannot be introduced.
If you give in, on grounds you want your freedoms back, ask yourself, what kind of people want you to accept a medical treatment you don’t need & which might kill you, just to get crumbs from their table?
They’re the sort of people who regard ordinary humans as viruses or cancer.
Accepting unnecessary vaccination won’t give you freedom, but it will assist in enabling the biggest genocide in history.
But it’s your call. Only you can decide it.
Mike
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Hello everyone. I need to be joined by people of courage, as it’s literally impossible for me to change things on my own.
Once a person knows in their heart that we’re being lied to, I put it to them that they have an obligation to stand up in some way and help.
If they choose not to, we’ve already lost.
That’s what I think anyway.
Mike
Once a person knows in their heart that we’re being lied to, I put it to them that they have an obligation to stand up in some way and help.
If they choose not to, we’ve already lost.
That’s what I think anyway.
Mike
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
The Telegraph newspaper doesn’t pre screen comments. They do take down comments which might be useful to their readers.
How do you like my new name for the variants fraud?
SAMIANTS.
So similar to the original that your immune system sees them pretty much the same as the original.
How do you like my new name for the variants fraud?
SAMIANTS.
So similar to the original that your immune system sees them pretty much the same as the original.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
I reckon that since the 20% difference between SARS & SARS-CoV-2 is absolutely no problem, no ones immune system fails to recognise that these are highly related viruses, I can’t say, but a helluva lot more than 20% is an evidence based starting position,
The common cold coronaviruses are very different & IIRC they are less than 40% similar, you’d have a basis for worry if variant was greater than 20% but less than 60% different.
Given we’re seeing 0.3% in 16mo, it’s irrelevant for this very slowly mutating virus.
It’s got quite respectable error detection & error correction capabilities, so antigen drift is extremely slow.
If you decide that my info is good, please continue the thought experiment: why are the worlds governments & advisors saying otherwise & making top up vaccines?
I think it’s the final March of the eugenicists. Bill Gates dad was into it as was Boris’ dad.
The common cold coronaviruses are very different & IIRC they are less than 40% similar, you’d have a basis for worry if variant was greater than 20% but less than 60% different.
Given we’re seeing 0.3% in 16mo, it’s irrelevant for this very slowly mutating virus.
It’s got quite respectable error detection & error correction capabilities, so antigen drift is extremely slow.
If you decide that my info is good, please continue the thought experiment: why are the worlds governments & advisors saying otherwise & making top up vaccines?
I think it’s the final March of the eugenicists. Bill Gates dad was into it as was Boris’ dad.