Loaded question.

The disutility of being somewhere you don't want to be is work in and of itself.

Fresh code word for "Nazbol" just dropped

“The operation involving fake right-wing accounts has become so big that information sharing is necessary so authorities do not target each other.”

https://rmx.news/germany/german-domestic-intelligence-agents-are-running-hundreds-of-fake-right-wing-extremist-social-media-accounts/

With Trump in attendance, Silk blames Diamond's death on the vaccine.

Silk gives speech saying Diamond died from the vaccine; Trump claims not to know her.

> Atlanta Antifa copycatted CHOP / CHAZ
> In the name of opposing colonialism
> Black cops clear the communist occupiers
> Antifa shoots at black cops
> Gets smoked for his trouble

...and Al-Jazeera is over here reporting on what Antifa was doing as though it was the most practical and sensible thing in the world.

What would happen to someone trying this in Qatar under Sharia law?

The "brown" in "red-brown" alliance doesn't mean what you think it means.

If I'm understanding Greer correctly, he's criticizing Irish nationalists for not being nationalist enough; not because they're Irish or nationalist.

This is similar to how Keith himself criticizes Republicans in America, no?

Keith is effectively defending third worldists and sodomites here on the implied grounds that their status as goyim apparently exempts them from culpability for being leftist degenerates.

Only Jews can be criticized for third worldism, goy! Stop criticizing gentile third-worldists!

I agree with the point that the "Globalist American Empire" label is used to scapegoat whites for the subversion of internationalist Jews, but Keith does the same thing when he refers to the establishment as Judeo-American or Atlanticist (as in the following screenshots)

https://xn--r1a.website/keith_woods/3666?single

This is part of a pattern of behavior.

> Emulate third worldists and communists!
> Attack the center-right from the same angle as third worldists and communists!
> Then a miracle will happen and the REAL right (which is apparently economically leftist) can take power!

And he and Joel wonder why people call them communists and Eurasianists.....

https://xn--r1a.website/keith_woods/3605

The only person missing the point is you, retard.

The article Thule links in the cited post explicitly covers the Jewish Question.

Why lie this egregiously when we can all fact check your claims with two clicks?

https://xn--r1a.website/joeldavisx/1619

> What tangible result has actually been delivered by the strategy of infiltrating the establishment right?

This is a dishonest framing of the question. These are our institutions. We are not the infiltrators. They are. We are not trying to "infiltrate the establishment"; we are trying to claw our institutions and nations back from the subversives who infiltrated them in the first place.

While we're reflecting on pragmatism...

What tangible result has actually been delivered from right-wingers emulating the left-wing color revolution tactics employed by Bolshevists, Islamists, and Third Worldists?

Are we better or worse off as a result of Charlottesville or January 6th?

Was Russia better or worse off as a result of the October Revolution?

Are fascists a dominant political force in Europe today?

Are third worldists not still living in mud huts and wiping their asses with their hands?

The West wasn't subverted through Islamo-Marxoid color revolutions. Cultural Marxism was invented because those tactics don't work in the West.

The West was subverted by the Long March Through the Institutions, and now these guys are practically saying:

"Surrender your institutions to the Trotskyite Jews who subverted them and attack center-right white people from a leftist economic angle!"

I'll file this one under "reward your enemy with the objective of their subversion."

To give a responsive answer to the original question (even though it isn't framed charitably or asked in good faith), the ongoing fight to retake control of right-wing political institutions has had some positive and important consequences:

- Stronger local protections for ownership of firearms

- Income tax relief for married couples who have kids

- Municipal and state-level prohibitions on critical theory

- The repeal of Roe v Wade, which will generally result in stronger protections against infanticide in less diverse states

- Increased daylight and visibility with regard to political corruption at all levels of government

- Increased demand to reform and repeal leftist, anti-white policy prescriptions

- The normalization of pro-white activism

- Increased right-wing grassroots engagement at all levels of politics and government

If we could have defeated the left by surrendering political power to it and attacking "the center right", we would have already won.

We aren't going to undo a 100 Year Long March through a multilateral democratic system in a single night or election cycle, or by retaking any single office -- especially not if we give up and join the left while redefining it as right-wing like Joel and Keith want us to do.

To restate their argument another way, they are basically saying:

"Promote left-wing economics and let communists and pedophiles control your school boards unless you're going to LARP as white Taliban and do a second October Revolution!"

It would be hard to think of a better way to derail or marginalize the current of pro-white activism that has emerged in right-wing socio-political spaces.

> We should give tax breaks to couples who get married and have kids!
> *Trump does it*
> Uhhh well that was just for his fat cat capitalist Jew donors!

Accelerationists always move the goalpost when there's a positive political development because the possibility of progress gives rise to a sense of responsibility.

If you can convince people that progress is insignificant or impossible, you can justify your own inaction to yourself and others. You don't have to take responsibility if there's nothing you can do, right?

The tax break thing is just one example. If you choose to see it as mere capitalist corruption, you can justify failing to act on your obligation to produce the next generation of people.

If there is no political solution, what outcome is an accelerationist trying to avoid by saying there is no political solution?

It's almost as though they need you to affirm it for them so they can justify their indolence to themselves.

If he's actually against using "GAE" as a euphemism for ZOG, he should have stopped promoting "proud Jew" Darren Beattie a long time ago

https://xn--r1a.website/nickjfuentes/9803

"Proud Jew" Darren Beattie has been actively promoting "Globalist American Empire" as a rhetorical substitute for "ZOG" or "globalism" for more than a year, as I've extensively documented.

https://xn--r1a.website/realjaredhowe/3350

> Globalist
> American

Pick one.

The American government may be a vehicle for globalism due to the subverted state thereof, but globalism isn't ethnically American.

Friendly reminder that Revolver is run by Darren Beattie, who is Jewish.

> China is opposed to GloboHomo

China: *installs back end social media button to make faggots go viral*

(No pun intended)

Damar Hamlin at the game