Постправда: The New Yorker о невозможности детального расследования факта применения химического оружия в Хан-Шейхуне, Сирия #posttruth #mediabias #fakenews (обращаю внимание, что слоган The New Yorker: "Fighting fake stories with real ones")
Выдержка из сегодняшней статьи Стива Колла, штатного корреспондента The New Yorker и декана факультета журналистики Колумбийского университета:
«…the Damascus government continues to stonewall international inspectors who are charged with insuring Syria’s chemical disarmament. As of yet, none have been able to visit the scene of the April 4th attack (Khan Shaykhun area and the Shayrat airbase).»
Источник: http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/while-trump-tweets-assad-and-putin-advance-in-syria
Выдержка из проекта резолюции Исполнительного совета Организации по запрещению химического оружия (ОЗХО), подготовленного Россией и Ираном (13 и 19 апреля 2017), EC-M-54/DEC/CRP.1/Rev.1:
«…1. Requests the Director-General to send, as soon as possible, a team of the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) to Syria in order to undertake a full-scale and thorough investigation in the Khan Shaykhun area and at the Shayrat airbase…
… 4. Also requests the Director-General to undertake without delay consultations with the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic, the relevant Syrian opposition sides, and all others who may be helpful in this regard, with a view to ensuring quick and safe access of the FFM to Khan Shaykhun and the Shayrat airbase and, in view of particular urgency of the matter, to report to the Council on the results of the consultations in five days from the adoption of this decision…»
Решение Исполнительного совета ОЗХО об отказе поддержать проект резолюции EC-M-54/DEC/CRP.1/Rev.1:
«The draft decision EC-M-54/DEC/CRP.1/Rev.1, dated 19 April 2017 was amended by the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Russian Federation on 20 April. Under Rule 42(b) of the Rules of Procedure, the aforementioned draft decision was considered and voted on. The vote led to the following result: 6 for (Algeria, China, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Russian Federation, South Africa, and the Sudan), 21 against (Australia, Belgium, Chile, France, Germany, Guatemala, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Poland, the Republic of Korea, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America), and 13 abstentions (Argentina, Armenia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Cameroon, Ghana, India, Iraq, Kenya, Morocco, Pakistan, Senegal, and Viet Nam). In the light of that result, the draft decision was not adopted.»
Источник: https://www.opcw.org/fileadmin/OPCW/EC/M-54/en/ecm5402_e_.pdf
Выдержка из сегодняшней статьи Стива Колла, штатного корреспондента The New Yorker и декана факультета журналистики Колумбийского университета:
«…the Damascus government continues to stonewall international inspectors who are charged with insuring Syria’s chemical disarmament. As of yet, none have been able to visit the scene of the April 4th attack (Khan Shaykhun area and the Shayrat airbase).»
Источник: http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/while-trump-tweets-assad-and-putin-advance-in-syria
Выдержка из проекта резолюции Исполнительного совета Организации по запрещению химического оружия (ОЗХО), подготовленного Россией и Ираном (13 и 19 апреля 2017), EC-M-54/DEC/CRP.1/Rev.1:
«…1. Requests the Director-General to send, as soon as possible, a team of the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) to Syria in order to undertake a full-scale and thorough investigation in the Khan Shaykhun area and at the Shayrat airbase…
… 4. Also requests the Director-General to undertake without delay consultations with the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic, the relevant Syrian opposition sides, and all others who may be helpful in this regard, with a view to ensuring quick and safe access of the FFM to Khan Shaykhun and the Shayrat airbase and, in view of particular urgency of the matter, to report to the Council on the results of the consultations in five days from the adoption of this decision…»
Решение Исполнительного совета ОЗХО об отказе поддержать проект резолюции EC-M-54/DEC/CRP.1/Rev.1:
«The draft decision EC-M-54/DEC/CRP.1/Rev.1, dated 19 April 2017 was amended by the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Russian Federation on 20 April. Under Rule 42(b) of the Rules of Procedure, the aforementioned draft decision was considered and voted on. The vote led to the following result: 6 for (Algeria, China, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Russian Federation, South Africa, and the Sudan), 21 against (Australia, Belgium, Chile, France, Germany, Guatemala, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Poland, the Republic of Korea, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America), and 13 abstentions (Argentina, Armenia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Cameroon, Ghana, India, Iraq, Kenya, Morocco, Pakistan, Senegal, and Viet Nam). In the light of that result, the draft decision was not adopted.»
Источник: https://www.opcw.org/fileadmin/OPCW/EC/M-54/en/ecm5402_e_.pdf
The New Yorker
While Trump Tweets, Assad and Putin Advance in Syria
Trump’s foreign policy so far is a lot like his Twitter feed: destabilizing, embarrassing, and damaging to the very interests that he seeks to promote.
Постправда: Подлинная история мальчика из Алеппо #posttruth #fakenews #mediabias Источник: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-40176781