Will USA Today issue an apology?

X link

One for the ages. “When you stop telling me to lie, I’ll stop shouting the truth.” — JK Rowling

There is a reason the Left are so upset about Harrison Butker’s speech about traditional family values.

Because the Left’s mission is to destroy the nuclear family, so that the individual is dependent on the State.

The Left want full control of all aspects of your life. They want both parents working, so they have more income tax to launder. They want your children being raised in their indoctrination centers known as public schools, so they can raise your children while you are at work.

The Left want to demonize your religion, so you will accept the Party as your God. They want every human isolated and without a higher purpose, so they will view serving the Party as their only purpose.

The Left’s ideology cannot coexist in a marketplace of free ideas, so they are seeking to destroy all other ideas.

The reason they are so triggered about Harrison Butker, and anyone else who speaks about traditional family values, is because they are trying to eliminate the idea of family.

REPORT: Dr. Naomi Wolf tells Alex Jones that the COVID shots are about “destroying women and babies” and “emasculating men.”

In Pfizer's own documents, the pharmaceutical giant focused more on researching the effects of the vaccine on sex and reproduction than on its impact on the lungs.

This is odd, considering that COVID is a respiratory virus.

And what the Pfizer documents reveal, along with medical studies, about the impact on fertility is alarming:

• The lipid nanoparticles accumulate in the ovaries.

• Severe menstrual and hormonal dysregulation.

• The lipid nanoparticles can cross the placenta.

• The shots affect sperm production and motility for a period of time.

• Pfizer's documents advise vaccinated men to use two reliable forms of contraception with unvaccinated women, suggesting a shedding risk.

• The lipid nanoparticles degrade the testes of baby boys in utero. “So we don't even know if the babies of vaccinated moms will grow up to be normal men.”

• Dr. Kimberly Biss has also noted that the miscarriage rate in the Pfizer trials was “80 PERCENT” and that “they knew that.”

Full Video: https://rumble.com/v4wv6e5-dr.-naomi-wolf-joins-alex-jones-and-exposes-the-globalist-blueprint.html

More Stories on @Vigilant_News:

‘Fully Vaxxed’ CNN Correspondent Dies Suddenly

Cancer surgeon drops ivermectin bombshell.

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊

BREAKING: Renowned American attorney Tom Renz testified before the Ohio Senate, alleging hospitals and doctors were “incentivized” to “murder” their patients to create the illusion that COVID-19 was a significant threat to public health.

@GeneralMCNews

https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1795913954591731992

We Have Been Lied To About EVERYTHING

Testimony: Challenger Astronauts Allegedly Alive

“I think we all remember the Challenger explosion that took place in 1986 that tragically took the lives of all seven astronauts on board. It launched not too far from where we're standing here today.

Well the interesting thing is a couple decades later this thing called the internet came about and someone allegedly found almost all of those astronauts alive and well, many using the same exact names.

As you can see here, we have Challenger astronaut Judith Resnick and also a Judith Resnick Yale Law Professor. Michael J. Smith, the pilot of the Challenger astronaut, and also professor at University of Wisconsin, now retired, Michael J. Smith.

Commander Dick Scobie, who is now president of cows and trees.

Now if you'll notice, (See video for pictures) they all have the exact same faces 30 some odd years later, the same exact name, and they are the same age. Now we all have a doppelganger out there, right? No big deal. But to have the same face, the same age, and the same exact name is extremely rare.

So where I could only find one case in the last 120 years. And we're supposed to believe that three people from one space flight have exact lookalikes have the same age and same exact names, this, ladies and gentlemen, is beyond statistically impossible.

Miss Resnick was questioned at Yale by a journalist and she panicked and ran from the camera. Why?”

I transcribed a very small potion of this testimony. Watch this video, this is nuts. NASA is laundering our money and feeding us lies.

The unvaccinated are frequently asked, “How did you know the COVID vaccines were dangerous when they first came out?”

The answer is simple: we didn’t.

However, we quickly figured out that the people pushing the shots were LIARS.

Watch Tucker Carlson explain this brilliantly.

“The behavior of the people selling me that [vaccine] was so transparently dishonest. I didn’t know that the vax wouldn’t work, which it didn’t, of course. I didn’t know that it would cause harm, which it did. But I did know that the people selling it were liars. Like, I knew that instantly. And I know some of them, but I could just tell by their behavior [that] they’re lying.

“And I was like, ‘I don’t know what this is. No one in my family is getting this ... period.’ Like I figured that out the first day ... I felt [something was wrong] so strongly, and I just obeyed [my instincts]. And I think that works.”

Full Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uElaHUSM7fI&t=1401s

More Stories on @Vigilant_News:

Trump Hater Crumbles When Confronted With One Simple Question

Dr. Phil Delivers Message Everyone Needs to Hear

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊

https://x.com/thechiefnerd/status/1798421056941601194?s=46&t=znSz1egTcJ0ZdBYmoPQAwA

🚩 Fmr. CDC Director Robert Redfield Makes a Series of Stunning Admissions That Were Once Deemed 'Misinformation'

"There was a decision not to do anything that made the vaccine sound like it didn't work."

"Two thirds of the people that I'm seeing infected in Maryland have been vaccinated."

"If you came down and visited me and interviewed my patients...you'd interview patient after patient after patient that did not have COVID but are very sick. You would say very sick, long COVID patients. And it's all from the vaccine."

"The spike protein is immunotoxic. You get infected, it's immunotoxic. But when you give the vaccine, we make the spike protein."

"When I give you an mRNA vaccine...I don't know how much spike protein you make because I give you mRNA and then your body goes and makes it...You may make it for a week...You may make it for a month."

"I use the protein vaccine so I know exactly how much spike protein you get. Your body's not becoming a [spike protein] manufacturing plant."

A censored Doctor during the pandemic confronts Fauci after being proven right about the vaccinations, the masks, and social distancing. Those who refused to follow the governments orders have been vindicated completely in light of all the information that has come out. Those who think for themselves have won this battle.

"Everything I was censored on, I was proven to be right.

You said in an interview that an institution should make it hard for people to live their lives so they'd feel pressured to get vaccinated.

*Plays audio where Fauci says that all objections to the Covid vaccinations were ideological bullshit*

Are all objections to Covid vaccinations ideological bullshit doctor Fauci?

In reference to making it hard for people to get an education, traveling, and working I'd say it very much was in context. I take great offense to this.

​I think America should take great offense to this.

Making it hard for people to live without getting a vaccination. You affected people's ability to work to flourish in American society. Shame on you.

Doctor Fauci, you've become doctor fear. Americans do not hate science. The American people hate having their freedoms taken from them. You inspired and created fear through mask mandates, school closures, and vaccine mandates that have destroyed the American people's trust in our public health institutions. This fear, you created, will continue to have ripple effects for generations to come. Quite frankly, you said, if you disagree with me you disagree with science. Doctor Fauci I disagree with you because I disagree with fear." https://x.com/Ultrafrog17/status/1797671538914640002

MSM Silent After Court Rules PCR Tests Unfit For Diagnosing Covid‼️🤫

Part 1

In 2020 a European court ruled that PCR tests were 97% unreliable for diagnosing Covid.

For some strange reason the main stream media (MSM) in Europe and the US have been deathly silent since the court found the PCR test to be legally useless in testing for the virus.  

Portuguese judges determined that a “positive” PCR test did not correspond to a COVID case and ruled that four German holidaymakers had been illegally quarantined in Portugal during the so called covid “pandemic” based on the widely used test.

Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.

Earlier this month, Portuguese judges upheld a decision from a lower court that found the forced quarantine of four holidaymakers to be unlawful. The case centered on the reliability (or lack thereof) of Covid-19 PCR tests.

The  verdict delivered on November 11, followed an appeal against a writ of habeas corpus filed by four Germans against the Azores Regional Health Authority. This body had been appealing a ruling from a lower court which had found in favor of the tourists, who claimed that they were illegally confined to a hotel without their consent. The tourists were ordered to stay in the hotel over the summer after one of them tested positive for coronavirus in a PCR test – the other three were labelled close contacts and therefore made to quarantine as well.
Unreliable, with a strong chance of false positives.

The deliberation of the Lisbon Appeal Court is comprehensive and fascinating. It ruled that the Azores Regional Health Authority had violated both Portuguese and international law by confining the Germans to the hotel. The judges also said that only a doctor can “diagnose” someone with a disease, and were critical of the fact that they were apparently never assessed by one.

They were also scathing about the reliability of the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, the most commonly used check for Covid.

The conclusion of their 34-page ruling included the following: “In view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”  

In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.

Tested positive? There could be as little as a 3% chance it’s correct 

This is not the first challenge to the credibility of PCR tests. Many people will be aware that their results have a lot to do with the number of amplifications that are performed, or the ‘cycle threshold.’ This number in most American and European labs is 35–40 cycles, but experts have clismed that even 35 cycles is far too many, and that a more reasonable protocol would call for 25–30 cycles. (Each cycle exponentially increases the amount of viral DNA in the sample).

Earlier this year, data from three US states – New York, Nevada and Massachusetts – showed that when the amount of the virus found in a person was taken into account, up to 90 percent of people who tested positive could actually have been negative, as they may have been carrying only tiny amounts of the virus.

The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”