Gianmarco Gargiulo Mastodon Bridge
510 subscribers
822 photos
21 videos
1.25K links
Bridged from https://mastodon.uno/@gianmarcogg03.

Most posts are other people's reposts. Forward headers, either from here or from Mastodon, don't apply when bridged, so it looks like it's all written by me!

Wanna comment? Sign up to the fediverse!
Download Telegram
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿšจ Not a thriller, but reality:
The Conservatives (EPP) want to overturn the historic vote against indiscriminate #ChatControl on Thursday and force a new vote.
This is a direct attack on democracy & privacy! โœ‰๏ธ

Protest now: ๐Ÿ‘Š
โ†’ https://fightchatcontrol.eu/#contact-tool
๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐ŸŒญ1
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น ๐ŸšจNon รจ un thriller, รจ la realtร :
I conservatori al Parlamento UE (PPE) vogliono ribaltare lo storico voto contro il #ChatControl indiscriminato e forzare una nuova votazione questo giovedรฌ!

Protesta ORA per la democrazia e la privacy! ๐Ÿ‘Š
โ†’ โ†’ https://fightchatcontrol.eu/it/#contact-tool
๐ŸŒญ1
The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux

https://www.sambent.com/the-engineer-who-tried-to-put-age-verification-into-linux-5/

The lasting damage was knowing it could happen at all: that a single contributor with no stated organizational backing could submit compliance infrastructure for surveillance law directly into the software that boots your computer, get it merged by two Microsoft employees, and have the creator of systemd personally block the removal.
๐Ÿคก1
I'm with @BrodieOnLinux@mstdn.social on this one: if you're against all of this #ageverification shit, don't go complain to the developers who are trying to avoid potential legal issues (maybe some are rushing, but that's another argument), but go complain to the stupid politicians working on these laws. Call them up and say "if you make this pass, I'm not voting for you anymore" or anything to make them change their mind, which is the right way to solve the problem.

https://youtu.be/-5AcreFk40U
๐Ÿ‘1
Perfect MacOS 26 Tahoe screenshot from the Journal app. Apple shipped this.
๐Ÿคฃ5
๐ŸšจNo Joke: Conservatives in the EU Parliament (EPP) want the vote on #ChatControl 1.0 to be repeated this Thursday - even though the Parliament already voted NO! ๐Ÿ˜ก

Make sure your MP stays strong. Contact them now!

๐Ÿ‘‰ https://fightchatcontrol.eu/#contact-tool

Make the voluntary scanning by Gmail, Microsoft, LinkedIn etc stop! ๐Ÿšจ https://tuta.com/blog/voluntary-scanning-google-microsoft
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บUS tech corps & lobby NGOs want to scan our chats! ๐Ÿ›‘ TOMORROW (agenda vote) we can kill #ChatControl for good!

๐Ÿ“ง Emails are ignored.

๐Ÿ“ž CALLS work!

Stop the lobby, call your MEPs NOW: https://fightchatcontrol.eu

Fact check: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/the-battle-over-chat-control-how-eu-governments-and-the-tech-lobby-are-trying-to-overturn-parliaments-vote-a-comprehensive-fact-check/
โค2
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡นLe Big Tech USA e le lobby vogliono scansionare le nostre chat! ๐Ÿ›‘ DOMANI (voto sull'ordine del giorno) possiamo affossare il #ChatControl per sempre!

Fermate le lobby, chiamate i vostri eurodeputati ORA: https://fightchatcontrol.eu

Fact-checking: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/the-battle-over-chat-control-how-eu-governments-and-the-tech-lobby-are-trying-to-overturn-parliaments-vote-a-comprehensive-fact-check/
RE: https://hostux.social/@rfc1036/116279298917087751

Ignoring the "fascist" angle for a second (I saw no proof in the blog post of this being 'orchestrated', be that by fascists or anyone else).

I think both things can be true at the same time โ€“ governments around the world are fast-tracking laws to verify the identity of Internet users online under the guise of "protecting children", with suspicious level of speed and coordination.

But also, systemd adding an optional 'date of birth' field is not the same as "systemd introducing age verification".

Is it possible that this field will be used in the future to require users to verify their age? Yes, just like the existing 'Location' field may be used in the future to require the user to verify their home address, and the realName field may be used to require the user to specify their full legal name.

That being said, we can't ignore the timing and the explicit justification for the PRs as stated by the author. Quote: "Stores the user's birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws..."

And yes, there are already Medium posts making the rounds that paint the author to be some kind of a sleeper agent who "came out of nowhere" and got his PRs approved by "Microsoft employees".

Being a fan of Hanlon's razor, I think the author simply seized the opportunity, and decided to do a bunch of drive-by PRs to big Linux-adjacent projects, in order to be able to put "systemd contributor" on his CV.

Is this stupid and akin to using COVID shortages to scalp toilet paper? Yes. Is it a malicious plot by Microsoft to sneak age verification into Linux? Probably not, they don't care about Linux on the desktop enough, and if they did, they wouldn't need to be subtle or design elaborate plots to propose adding age verification to it.
There's also a very obvious reason why you see so many posts/articles/toots about it โ€“ and yes, a lot of them include misrepresented/wrong information, fear mongering and clickbait titles.

Everybody is already on edge because of the 'age verification' stuff that's taking place all around the world. And like a lot of people, I also thought "well, if Windows/macOS asks for my ID, at least there's always Linux".

Seeing some big Linux-adjacent projects not only refusing to react to it with anything other than "absolutely not, go fuck yourself" but even accepting PRs and discussing how best to comply with those laws really breaks my heart.

And even if the aforementioned PRs do not 'verify' anything, the communication from systemd developers has been lackluster.

From the politics standpoint, even if I did think that a 'birthDate' field was useful, I would either have asked the author to reword his PR (because it has nothing to do with the "age verification laws" and wording it this way would obviously create a huge shitstorm online, which it did), or made a public announcement explaining the change and assuring the users that systemd will never try to 'verify' your age.
It's clear that AI assisted coding is dividing developers (welcome to the culture wars!). I've seen a few blog posts now that talk about how some people just "love the craft", "delight in making something just right, like knitting", etc, as opposed to people who just "want to make it work". As if that explains the divide.

How about this, some people resent the notion of being a babysitter to a stochastic token machine, hastening their own cognitive decline. Some people resent paying rent to a handful of US companies, all coming directly out of the TESCREAL human extinction cult, to be able to write software. Some people resent the "worse is better" steady decline of software quality over the past two decades, now supercharged. Some people resent that the hegemonic computing ecosystem is entirely shaped by the logic of venture capital. Some people hate that the digital commons is walled off and sold back to us. Oh and I guess some people also don't like the thought of making coding several orders of magnitude more energy intensive during a climate emergency.

But sure, no, it's really because we mourn the loss of our hobby.
๐Ÿ‘4๐Ÿฅด3๐Ÿ”ฅ2โค1๐Ÿค”1
[1/2] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/10/uk-society-authors-logo-identify-books-written-by-humans-not-ai

https://gnu.org/philosophy/copyright-vs-community.html

*UK Society of Authors launches logo to identify books written by humans.* I support this specific campaign, because it is a campaign for honesty and against worthless Pretend Intelligence. It may help people reject PI slop. However, I continue to reject the selfishness of most of the same authors, when they demand
[2/2] the power to stop human readers from honestly and truthfully sharing copies of human-authored books with other humans.
End-to-End Encryption is good but metadata protection counts as much. Names, group descriptions and memberships, avatars, who talks to whom ...

Both #deltachat and #signal go to great length to protect all the metadata that WhatsApp grants itself gratuitously. #Matrix stores similar scales of metadata on their servers, even if you can choose which server stores it.

Everything is better than #Telegram which additionally stores message contents in all group chats/channels and most 1:1 chats.
โค1๐Ÿ’ฏ1
So, for anyone who cares, here's a long-form response, personally and from my POV as head of #Teckids, regarding the discussion around birth date in #systemd:

https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2026-March/052087.html
โค1