If you think you're having trouble with this so-called sticking to a ball nonsense you've got the analogies wrong and you don't understand gravity. Buoyancy doesn't work without gravity pulling down on the objects in the first place. This is what a lot of the flat earthers get wrong because they don't understand what it is they're complaining about in the first place. It's the same reason that they can't understand celestial navigation and why you don't see the same stars in the northern hemisphere in the southern hemisphere. That very simple observation is something they cannot understand or refuse to understand because it blows up the rest of the very poorly constructed model that they have which doesn't work.
Even their argument about water seeking its level doesn't work because if that were the case no canal would need locks! You would dig a canal and it would be one flat level through the entire canal with no need to raise or lower boats to higher or lower levels of water right? I hate to tell you but there are plenty of locks in the canals around here and you need to go through a ton of them to get anywhere

I am very familiar with locks and dams having grown up along the Mississippi River. Before those man made devices the river was a wild rapid making it much less than desirable for commerce on a large scale. Locks were needed to tame the river - that's it!

Maybe our eyes are deceiving us because is it not true that we have water sticking to a ball? What are you seeing? Is it really nonsense to question how that is possible?

Recently, I bumped into Walter Russell's writings as well. I think he's a modern mystic sage with inspiring thoughts.

Also, I think it could be interesting to explore how Walter Russell's writings relate to Process Physics and other aether theories and interpretations.

In fact, Walter Russell's usage of noun-based language can be compared with the more verb-based thinking behind Process Physics. For instance, "Creator" can be related with "creative processuality"; "Idea" can be related with "process of ideation" (or, "process of thought formation"); and "body forms" can be related with "foreground patterns".

In a nutshell, Process Physics basically starts out with a model of an aether-like "ground of being" in which foreground "patterns of connectivity" develop from a giant cosmic background fabric of fluctuating energy-events — all this in a manner that is more thought-like than substance-like. Like this, it can be interpreted as a "process of ideation" or "thought formation". This "process of ideation" can be imagined as lifting itself out of an "aether-like ocean of nothingness", which which basically consists of its own "microvibratory background fluctuations". It can do so because all such micro-fluctuations affect each other vibrationally and can thereby trigger the emergence of higher-order levels of collective vibration, or, in other words, more prominent foreground patterns of processual connectivity (this can be likened with constructive resonance). Furthermore, these patterns of connectivity have an internal preference of how to hook up with each other. Let me try to explain: This is based on a similar kind of "organic decision-making" as can be found in tree root networks, fungal networks, and biological neural networks. To be more precise: similarly sized, or similarly vibrating patterns will connect with each other (like equally-sized tree roots that can grow together into so-called root grafts, so that a large main connection in the forest root network will appear, going from one tree to another).

In the Process Physics model, it works fairly similar: Like-minded, similarly organized activity patterns can hook up and start to vibrate together in a similarly constructive manner. Non-similar patterns, on the other hand, will not yield such mutually constructive effects. Instead, such a confrontation of non-similar patterns will lead to one collective of activity patterns "overwhelming" or "swallowing" the other, so that the less prominent collectives of activity patterns will "fall prey to", and be integrated into the dominant ones. In such a case, the swallowed activity patterns are in time gradually replaced by others, in a constant proces of renewal, just like biological cells in an organism's body are constantly being renewed ...

Obviously, this is just a cobbled-together summary of the actual details of Process Physics, but basically it gives rise to a "self-creative, mind-like ideation process" from aether-like beginnings. And based on all the above, it also makes sense to think of this self-creative process of vibratory activity patterns as a living, conscious, divine universe.

Hope this makes sense! ☺️

Admittedly, it's a slightly different perspective than Walter Russell's, but I hope that the commonalities are still apparent enough. 🙂🙏

Легендарное фото отпечатка ботинка Нила Армстронга на лунном грунте и его скафандр в музее Смитсоновского университета

Думаю, сравнивая фотографии, вы уже заметили, что плоская подошва скафандра не очень соответствует оставленному следу на Луне.

Таки была ли высадка на Луну?

ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ

Ok here is a theory medusa had snakes for hair like electricity, right. Now medusa turned you to stone if you looked at her right. What if it was a big weapon that transmuted life into stone. Looking like electric snakes for hair almost everyone who witnessed it was turned to stone.

Magellanica
by: tartariantalisman

Magellanica. I kept seeing it everywhere but disappears late 1600s. This area was named after the explorer, Magellan…


⚡️ Read the full article at https://tartariabritannica.com/blog/magellanica/ ⚡️