๐„๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐จ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก ๐Ÿ•Š
2.67K subscribers
2.96K photos
448 videos
134 files
701 links
Trying to make sense of the world in a world full of untruths.

๐–ก› A collection of things I find interesting โ€” exploring the realmโ€™s deeper truths.

Thank you for joining the journey ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Mike Wolfe
I was thinking about the last paragraph and some things occurred to me.
If this happened, obviously atmospheric water would increase, a most potent greenhouse gas.
Dr Kent Hovind mentioned that if there is 50% more O2 than now we are at 21% in the past there was 32%, at over 20 psig air pressure, Kent says "Just Breathing would be exciting" https://www.wiseoldgoat.com/papers-creation/hovind-seminar_part2a_2007.html (a good read)

More pressure and O2, more absorption in the blood, Co2 for plants, they wouldn't have to work so hard to get it
With higher pressure, does this mean that helium balloons have more lift, so they could be smaller? How about air planes wing area, can they be smaller?
What about atmospheric electricity? How would this change?
There are many paintings from the past with red sky's. Why? Would this vapor canopy cause this? Due to filtering or maybe some kind of plasma glow with more atmospheric charge?
Would humans need as much food if the atmosphere was more dense and O2 rich?

Just some questions
A few interesting points in this small article from 1733:

โถ A Roman pavement was found in England and, which according the inscription, was laid around the year 33

โท The pavement was made of less than one inch square tiles, creating a beautiful mosaic

โธ Several human bones and skulls were found that were of prodigious size

๐Ÿ“ฐ The Derby Mercury. Derbyshire, England, Sunday, August 23, 1733, p. 4.

โ€ขโ€ขโ€ขโ€ขโ€ขโ€ขโ€ขโ€ขโ€ขโ€ข
๐„๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐จ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ
๐„๐Ž๐“๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ญ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐Ÿ— Sommes nous sรปr de ce que nous voyons?

Parce que la rรฉalitรฉ nโ€™est pas forcรฉment ce que nous pensons voir.

Essayons toujours de prendre du recul afin dโ€™essayer de voir la rรฉalitรฉ sous un autre angle.


๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Are we sure of what we're seeing?

Because reality is not necessarily what we think we see.

Let's always try to take a step back and see reality from another angle.

Artiste : Markus Raetz.


Terre Plane :
https://tttttt.me/LabHyp_Terre_Plane

Du Labyrinthe aux Hypothรจses :
https://tttttt.me/Du_Labyrinthe_aux_Hypotheses

Suivez nous aussi sur TikTok