dont worry, your secret is safe

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00869916.pdf

… i mean, look, this slots right into what i’ve documented.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00667304.pdf

’In order to create
> new monetary or exchange systems that promote sustainable development there
> needs to be a quantum leap in current efforts. For that to happen, there
> needs to be a new strategic dialogue around transforming current monetary
> systems.’


https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02721858.pdf

that is an excellent question.

2010.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01300616.pdf

I did wonder if he could possibly make it more obvious - but he could

https://xn--r1a.website/disclosetv/19664

What the Bank for International Settlements develop, is a machine to route the individual, ‘ethical’ Sustainable Development Goals through the underlying conditional CBDC.

This develops ‘The Innovation Hub’ even further. It’s fully sourced, with 34 BIS links to their own material.

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-sdg-machine

here’s the PDF. didn’t finish writing/editing/sourcing/‘fact checking’ etc until well past 3AM, but i wanted to get it out, not least because of Jem Bendell’s absurd version of the Epstein events, so that I can focus on just that.

obligatory ‘once the Epstein essay out I will f- off for a while’. eventually it’ll be true.

If Epstein’s money came from just one source, he'd belong to that source. The opacity of the funding is a structural necessity - but it also explains why no journalist ever could ‘follow the money’ to a singular source.

A switchboard operator funded by everyone and owned by no one can't be shut down by a single party deciding to withdraw. This would similarly explains why the 2008 plea deal held, and why the network expanded afterward. No single party could shut him down because no single party owned him - not even Wexner who distanced himself in public in the wake of 2008.

But once the operator had served his purpose, he became a liability.

It would also logically dictate that he had to operate within a common, mutually agreed upon boundary, because if he didn't all the money would withdraw.

12 hours of focused effect later - first full draft. will work on this until done, will be hours, still not properly sourced. then quite possibly do swift onboarding summary essay. then take a break.

Long night. Final proofread. Most heavily sourced essay of the lot.

Done.

410 excuse me for hitting the sack

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/epstein

PDF

unsure why some people want the essay to be about something else - if you want to read about blackmail, then read webb, if you want it to be about eugenics, then you have to go elsewhere because a) there’s no evidence of that in those emails i reviewed and b) eugenics doesn’t explain the system itself

what the essay does is draw direct connections between what epstein was actually up to - setting aside the MSM noise - and what else they were doing while you didn’t watch.

they built a global system of indicator governance, with digital id an eventual requirement, where ‘impact finance’ imposes ‘ethics’ on macro transactions and conditional payment CBDCs will impose at micro.

and that could easily lead to far worse abuses than anything else suggested. in fact, it almost certainly will.

blackmail alone could not have facilitated this outcome. only systems theory could, which incidentally has been a prime focal point of mine.

time for a quick check on google... and not a single link to my substack comes up when searching over a 7-day period.

not one.

searching over the past month, only 'the biosphere' is there. no notes, no posts, nothing.

lots of stray facebook comments, a number of twitter posts, Giubbe Rossi news, Axel Krauss... but only one to the source itself.