this, right here, is basically why i stopped using ChatGPT to ‘fact check’ my substack essays, because it continuously seeks to water down every claim until it’s meaningless.

ChatGPT is a Fabian parasite AI.

subscription cancelled to ChatGPT as of this moment. it is absolutely not worth the money, because it is a deceitful liar.

what you do is

a) know your shit. do not allow AI to run off in a direction that makes no sense.
b) open every AI you have; ChatGPT, Opus, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeep, Venice… every single one.
c) whenever an AI is trying its dishonest tricks - and I mean ChatGPT is BAD - you run the same material through ever other AI (it is REALLY IMPORTANT that you know your stuff and can source it all, because especially Opus will demand to see evidence)
d) have other AIs respond to, typically, ChatGPT because ChatGPT will look for a technical loophole in your argument and can keep you running around in circles forever

what the other AIs add is that they’re really good at pre-empting the loopholes ChatGPT will exploit to protect child molesters such as Epstein.

in effect, use other AIs as lawyers (that you don’t trust, so have to check) on your behalf.

The reason why the NGFS Scientific Advisory Committee is a likely place they seek to hide is because they establish what counts as ‘science’ relating to the NGFS ‘black box’ Scenarios

Those scenarios determine the risk relating to borrowing, and coupled with Basel 3.1 which enable more fine grained setting of risk weights, it allows the NGFS to ‘strand’ assets making them uninvestable, uninsurable, unmortgageable.

So if they want to confiscate prime lands in Hawaii just declare it a future climate risk site and raise the risk weights by 500% making all insurance companies withdraw from the market.

Then have a totally organic fire break out and the corrupt few steal your prized home for pennies on the dollar.

And no one is responsible because it was modelled by a ‘black box’ which is above reproach.

It’s the same scam used in climate change modelling now used to steal homes, factories, plains, anything those crooks can think of.

oooh… i didn’t actually know that. so that means Marx ‘borrowed’ not just Ricardo’s labour theory of value, but also Fragment on Machines?

that’s… interesting.

it was also Ricardo’s idea to monopolise the currency, which took place (gradually) through the Bank Charter Act of 18444…


https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01902523.pdf

definitely too early in the morning to read this, but here it is

https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/ricardo/tax/ch31.htm

A black box governs the financial system, and the NGFS SAC — a committee with no published membership — governs the black box.


https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-innovation-hub

PDF

given how hard the MSM shill a specific narrative relating to Peter Mandelson and Epstein, I feel as though I have to read all the other emails.

I don’t trust them for a second, and fully expect this to be a deliberate attempt to distract from his actual emails (apart from Rothschild owning most of Buckinghamshire, per ‘Petey’)

‘Should be announced tonight’ is neither agreeing or disagreeing. Mandelson doesn’t actually leak anything here though it’s not a good look.

Is this the strongest evidence of this leaking? This is what the MSM blows up?

speculation, of course, but the casual response here alone is of interest.

because to anyone else going to waddesdon manor for the night… it would probably have prompted a somewhat more excited response.

Epstein is a sort of human tipheret is my reading. a human connection clearinghouse.

which would explain his big, black book, and also ie Melanie Walker’s attempt to ingratiate her idea as theirs… she needed him to vouch for her idea.

it also explains why the potential of him flipping a few weeks prior would lead to a ‘suicide’ soon after - because if he flips, the entire network is exposed.

and epstein already working on blended finance (impact investing) prior to the Gates Foundation/JPM/OPIC deal was even announced placed that at the heart of the financial strategy - and 'impact investing' was Rockefeller's...

yeah, ok, …

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01894969.pdf

see, even the end goal makes perfect sense.

we have the impact investment (blended finance), we have the ‘social good currency’ (CBDC with Rosalind’s Three-Party Lock)…

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA02141680.pdf

and here we have the ‘social good bond’ in the company of foundation billionaire ‘philanthropes’


https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01903035.pdf

i reckon i have enough to call it.