i receive emails now and then from followers on substack but can i please request that you either DM me on substack or here rather than send emails as i don't tend to reply to emails.

thank you.

so we also have zuckerberg, soros (and gates) in context of blended finance:

'It's all private sector not charity. But can be high risk and do blended finance w all types of
stuff and also leverage govt money.
Bet I could get soros and zuckerberg and maybe even bill to do it. '



https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01214403.pdf

DAF = Donor-Advised Fund

Melanie Walker fits the bill

yes, very likely Melanie Walker.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01617356.pdf

why is larry summers asking epstein on whether he should do a Mongolian gig?


https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00842500.pdf

to epstein:

'Apparently Hilary Clinton would also be here the same day as you ( and i guess you know her pretty well). '

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01843307.pdf

Again, the Bank for International Settlements Innovation Hub projects are all components which, when you put them together, create a global control system. The NGFS Scientific Advisory Committee is likely the head of the operation.

Carstens hinted as much, but take them all as applications running on the unified ledger, some of which depend on the outputs of other applications.

And global surveillance, Digital Twins and AI, tokenisation, atomicity, three-party locks (conditional payments), … they’re all part of it. The net result is a global control system, with ISO 20022 being the fundamental grammar of the system.

More later. There’s rather a lot to go through here.

it's too bad i don't have any reach.

let's return to this one.

'impact investing' with epstein and billy g.

there's one issue here...

impact investing requires government (public) finance. but the first US specific fund in that regard related to OPIC.

and that arrived... October 28, 2011. the same date as that meeting.

so how did Epstein/Bill G etc know about the money unlocking up front?

need to trace down exact timeline.

from elsewhere, around a third was allocated to health. Gates Foundation was present in that field.

https://ssir.org/articles/entry/creating_a_future_impact_investing_strategy

'given your involvement in the area'... again.... impact investing, before OPIC announced the funding?

'... a preview of a unique new impact investment product designed to provide the Foundation's partners with low-cost capital for product development.'

it's gotta be the OPIC funding. the foundation partners are subsidised by the dumbest investor on the block - the taxpayer.

'Low-cost capital' doesn't come from the private sector as they want a return on investment
it doesn't come from the 'philanthropes', who only supply a teenie sliver of the overall amount
it can only come from the taxpayer, especially when required at scale

socialise the losses, privatise the profits. this was the first rollout (there was a $1m trial balloon a few years prior), and the full launch took place in April, 2012, with Hillary Clinton making that announcement.

Billy G had access to this, pre-announcement, and Jeffrey Epstein - per that email - was already involved in the area.

now, commence the total silence which makes no rational sense whatsoever.

i have however noticed a sharp increase in "it's already over, just give up" bullshit replies, and you can quite frankly all fuck off.

the BIS IH creation is NOT assembled at this stage, it is DEFINITELY not too late.

in 18 months, sure, we'd be in a tough spot. but at this stage, there's still time.

let me explain what’s so wrong about this Epstein email

https://escapekey.substack.com/p/from-bellagio-to-basel

ChatGPT works to protect Epstein and his fellows. absolutely unbelievable how hard it fights.

this, right here, is basically why i stopped using ChatGPT to ‘fact check’ my substack essays, because it continuously seeks to water down every claim until it’s meaningless.

ChatGPT is a Fabian parasite AI.

subscription cancelled to ChatGPT as of this moment. it is absolutely not worth the money, because it is a deceitful liar.

what you do is

a) know your shit. do not allow AI to run off in a direction that makes no sense.
b) open every AI you have; ChatGPT, Opus, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeep, Venice… every single one.
c) whenever an AI is trying its dishonest tricks - and I mean ChatGPT is BAD - you run the same material through ever other AI (it is REALLY IMPORTANT that you know your stuff and can source it all, because especially Opus will demand to see evidence)
d) have other AIs respond to, typically, ChatGPT because ChatGPT will look for a technical loophole in your argument and can keep you running around in circles forever

what the other AIs add is that they’re really good at pre-empting the loopholes ChatGPT will exploit to protect child molesters such as Epstein.

in effect, use other AIs as lawyers (that you don’t trust, so have to check) on your behalf.

The reason why the NGFS Scientific Advisory Committee is a likely place they seek to hide is because they establish what counts as ‘science’ relating to the NGFS ‘black box’ Scenarios

Those scenarios determine the risk relating to borrowing, and coupled with Basel 3.1 which enable more fine grained setting of risk weights, it allows the NGFS to ‘strand’ assets making them uninvestable, uninsurable, unmortgageable.

So if they want to confiscate prime lands in Hawaii just declare it a future climate risk site and raise the risk weights by 500% making all insurance companies withdraw from the market.

Then have a totally organic fire break out and the corrupt few steal your prized home for pennies on the dollar.

And no one is responsible because it was modelled by a ‘black box’ which is above reproach.

It’s the same scam used in climate change modelling now used to steal homes, factories, plains, anything those crooks can think of.