👍🏻 Triggering the libs: Making them react in an emotionally negative manner to trolling or shitposting, either online or IRL.

👏🏻 BTFO’ing the libs: Beating them with rhetoric to the point where they ragequit, block/delete, or leave. Either online or IRL.

🔥 Owning the libs: Getting a “win” in the political or metapolitical realm. Like the others this can be done either online or IRL, however IRL is preferable. This also pretty much includes the other two. This is done through activism, spreading memes into the mainstream, stifling enemy action, political victories, etc.

Examples include:

• Bringing The Great Replacement into mainstream consciousness despite the taboo

• Things like the New Year light display on the Erasmus Bridge

• The recent demonstration in Hull by PA (pretty much anything PA does tbh)

• Policy changes or reversals (Roe, Brexit etc.)

It can be argued, and is probably true that triggering and BTFOing while immensely satisfying, are ultimately pointless. Owning the libs should be the main objective.

A giant point-and-sputter type seethe post from our friends over there at the CFR. It’s interesting that they refer to the broader right-wing movement as “reactionary populism”.

There’s a key passage in here that is very telling:

“Opponents of reactionary populism need to assume that they are in for a protracted political fight. The growing normalization of reactionary populism presents particularly acute dilemmas. Once extremist views become destigmatized, politicians and parties have no choice but to engage with them on their own terms. Efforts to selectively co-opt far-right positions, such as the Danish Social Democrats’ adoption of hard-line policies on immigration and cultural integration, may succeed in diminishing support for radicals. But they also facilitate normalization, which opens the door for extremists to inject ever more radical, illiberal, and authoritarian positions into the mainstream.”

In other words, things are going the direction we want them to and there’s largely nothing they can do about it. The best they can hope for is mainstream parties/institutions co-opt rad-right positions in an effort to moderate or neutralize the energy. But if that happens it just increasingly normalizes the positions. A lose-lose on their end.

Very whitepilling and should be motivation to triple down and keep up the pressure. 👌🏻

https://archive.vn/6mx1G

https://odysee.com/@PoxPopuli:a/poxpopuliandfriends:2

Apologies to all for the terrible audio quality, it’s a crapshoot sometimes with the mobile setup.

Good talk!

Re-normalize the radical and “extreme”.

De-normalize the absurd.

This is largely done through bullying.

The guy who wrote this is an octaroon who married a Nordic-type White woman and whose kids came out looking like they have no black ancestry at all.

Assuming his ol’ lady wasn’t cucking him for a White dude and those are his actual kids, it would make sense for him to write something like this, even in one of the most prestigious mouthpieces of the regime.

He see’s the direction state discrimination is going (clearly anti-White) and looks at his little blonde haired, blue eyed (for now) kids and wants to protect them.

Welcome to the club, nigga. Better start taking the side of your kids if you want them to have a decent future.

Really enjoying the back and forth that I’m seeing over rhetoric, terminology, naming etc. It might seem like a dumb, boring, waste of time to argue over words but as Imperium Mike & Morgoth have pointed out, largely speaking naming=framing. Whichever camps meme’s stick first, they drive the narrative. (Think groomer or election denier)

This made me think of the concept of Woke Capital that became popular over the past few years. At first glance it seems like a shiny new effective way to point out how “woke ideology” has taken over the corporate world. Indeed the Twitter account by the same name was really useful at exposing it.

But the only reason it seems novel is because the name itself Woke Capital is framed as a contradiction. It’s already entirely within the leftist frame from its inception:

Corporations/Capital = Right-Wing/Fascism/Conservatism etc.

whereas Woke = progressive/libtarded/anti-corporate etc.

This is already ceding too much of the narrative to the enemy. It’s playing their game, at their table, by their rules. It’s accepting the above definitions instead of defining the phenomenon ourselves.

Woke Capital becomes little more than saying “Hey! This isn’t the way things are supposed to work! No fair!”. When in reality the message that should be conveyed is something like “Capital/business/corporations have never been inherently right-wing. It’s a lie we’ve accepted as truth. This is how power works, any institution is susceptible to corruption given enough incentives.”

This is a large part of the reason I have a problem with using any marxoid/leftist language or terminology in the first place. While “class struggle” does describe something actually happening, I have an instinctual aversion to its framing as such. I cringe when I hear people (especially on the right) using words like bourgeois, capitalism, or praxis un-ironically. You’ll never catch me either singing the praises of or denigrating “capitalism” because I reject the concept outright. Working,middle and upper class even sort of give me the heebie jeebies.

Eventually “racism” as a term should be heaped on the pyre too. “Racism? Oh you mean normal human behavior?” But for now, it’s usage is too much fun to discard.

https://xn--r1a.website/guidetokulchur/4200

I’m going to go over and discuss this Cole piece later on today.

James O’Keefe is being attacked from the Right with the argument that his video exposés never really affected anything.

This isn’t true. Or at least wasn’t always true. The first Project Veritas investigation into ACORN was a huge scandal at the time.

It really exposed people to what’s commonly referred to as the “swamp” or “regime” and the incestuous nature of the relationship between non-profits, the media & the government.

Over time however, each scandal PV exposed became less and less notable.

Not because they were “nothingburgers”, but because political polarization gradually set in to a point to where now each side of the great divide is largely indifferent to each story.

Teachers grooming kids?

If you’re a libtard it’s fake news cooked up by racist O’Keefe.

If you’re on the Right, you may point and screech for like a week about it but then the story goes away, never to be mentioned again.

This isn’t necessarily a bad thing or an indictment of O’Keefe’s/PV’s work. It’s a positive sign of irreconcilable differences.

O’Keefe’s potential ouster from PV, which he created is also a positive sign. It’s an indication of at least two things from what I can’t tell:

1. I doubt it’s a coincidence that this comes on the heels of his Pfizer exposé. Clearly Pfizer has a lot of stroke with the regime. Politicians and media outlets from both sides are clearly subservient to Big Pharma. I can imagine some of the main donors to PV “getting the call” because O’Keefe flew a little too close to the sun on this one.

2. It also indicates a modified version of Conquest’s second law: If an explicitly right-wing organization gets big enough, eventually Con Inc. will sink it’s claws in so far as to turn it into a controlled opposition operation.

Both of these are a compliment to O’Keefe’s success and impact. He’s been a thorn in the side of at least one half of the establishment for years and showcased what one guy with an undercover camera could accomplish.

I don’t think undercover Matthew Modine is going anywhere, anytime soon. If PV succeeds in removing him from the organization he created then it will just be another on the long list of once great organizations to disappoint. Nothing new for the Right.

Some of these are actually kind of funny.

Some are actually complimentary (snow possum? That sounds pretty rad tbh)

None of them are actually insulting (unless you count the really low-effort unimaginative ones).

And not a single one of them… absolutely none… will ever come close to our magic word. 😊

https://xn--r1a.website/jimgoad/217

“7 Things That Would Speed Up The Great Replacement”

https://time.com/6253531/how-to-fix-immigration-us/

https://youtu.be/WFKXJ091Ed4

Chris Stapleton absolutely killed it last night singing the National Anthem at the annual Super Bread & Circus display, there’s really no denying that. Especially if you’re a traditional Country Music respecter. They laid it on extra thick this year with the performative patriotism.

I haven’t checked but I’m sure the standard conservative explanation will go something like “See?!! Get woke go broke! The NFL has finally realized that the BLM stuff doesn’t fly with REAL America! The free market hurr durr duh durr hurr!”

The real explanation should be obvious to anyone who has been even casually paying attention. The regime is wheeling out the big guns of patriotic/Americana aesthetics and motifs to reel back in and mollify the heartlanders.

They’re hoping that by showcasing the troops saluting in their dress blues, the coaches and players brought to tears by Stapleton’s rendition of the Star Spangled Banner and the overall “America, Fuck Yeah!” atmosphere, that the right leaning “normies” will find it in their hearts to plug back in to the regularly scheduled programming.

Of course if you’re an American with even a modicum of self respect you will take this as an insulting display of whatever the word is for whenever someone is trying to feed you a line a bullshit, and they know YOU know they’re trying to feed you a line of bullshit, but they keep right on trying to feed you the line of bullshit.

The Stapleton performance was an instant classic imo. There’s no shame in enjoying it, but it’s best to take it for what it’s worth (something we can use to undermine them) than what it actually is (their attempt to undermine us).

https://odysee.com/@thewritersblock:d/modernwarfarewithtyrandgad:d

I must make a minor correction to one of the anecdotes I shared yesterday during this frenly chat with these esteemed lads.

At one point helicopters were brought up and I told a story about “one of the engines catching fire” while I was aboard. I mixed up a couple of different recollections of mine. It was a C-130, not a helicopter engine catching fire. A C-130 has 4 engines and while not ideal, can probably spare one at least for a while. If a helicopter engine catches fire, I’d imagine you’re pretty well… cooked.

This mis-remembering on my part is more than likely due to multiple factors:

1. In the words of Alex Jones: “I’m going to be honest with you…. I’m kind of retarded”.

2. It’s been close to two decades since my adventures of helping to bring freedom and democracy to Mesopotamia, so these stories tend to bunch together in the memory bank.

3. One of the brats was mercilessly trolling me during the stream because apparently they believe spending time at the park is more important than dear old dad helping to spread racism online. Kids these days.

More than likely I was thinking about the V-22 Osprey, which has a notorious (and imo unacceptable) history of accidents.

At any rate, great chat with Nix and TyR. 👌🏻