Article 12 of the Animal Protection Law (2004) provides that the slaughter of animals will be carried out, considering religious requirements, without frightening or startling the animal, in the least painful manner possible and as quickly as possible.
The Government of Turkey is urged to mandate the humane slaughter of all farm animals. Animals should be instantaneously rendered unconscious and insensible to pain and distress prior to slaughter. Today, there is growing consensus amongst religious authorities worldwide that pre-slaughter stunning is compatible with religious principles. Humane halal slaughter allows for the animal to be temporarily rendered unconscious via stunning prior to slaughter, as long as the animal's skull remains intact and the animal would regain consciousness in time should slaughter not occur. Therefore, animals should be unconscious before being bled, and no further processing should occur until irreversible loss of consciousness is confirmed.
The responsibility for different types of animals currently falls under multiple Ministries and Departments. The Government of Turkey is recommended to align all animal welfare under one Ministry, with appropriate resources for research, implementation and enforcement.
The Government of Turkey is encouraged to create a national multi-stakeholder committee to effectively engage all actors involved in maintaining the wellbeing of animals and to find solutions for welfare concerns.
Most literature on Islam, the environment, and climate change is theoretical and focuses on Islamic environmental ethics. While it indicates a growing ecological thought, it is unclear to what extent this “greening” affects broader sections of the global Muslim community. Research suggests that Islamic environmentalism is still a minority phenomenon among Muslims.
Muslims interpret climate change in different ways, regarding it as caused by (a) humans, (b) God, or (c) neglecting its existence.
The Government of Turkey is urged to mandate the humane slaughter of all farm animals. Animals should be instantaneously rendered unconscious and insensible to pain and distress prior to slaughter. Today, there is growing consensus amongst religious authorities worldwide that pre-slaughter stunning is compatible with religious principles. Humane halal slaughter allows for the animal to be temporarily rendered unconscious via stunning prior to slaughter, as long as the animal's skull remains intact and the animal would regain consciousness in time should slaughter not occur. Therefore, animals should be unconscious before being bled, and no further processing should occur until irreversible loss of consciousness is confirmed.
The responsibility for different types of animals currently falls under multiple Ministries and Departments. The Government of Turkey is recommended to align all animal welfare under one Ministry, with appropriate resources for research, implementation and enforcement.
The Government of Turkey is encouraged to create a national multi-stakeholder committee to effectively engage all actors involved in maintaining the wellbeing of animals and to find solutions for welfare concerns.
Most literature on Islam, the environment, and climate change is theoretical and focuses on Islamic environmental ethics. While it indicates a growing ecological thought, it is unclear to what extent this “greening” affects broader sections of the global Muslim community. Research suggests that Islamic environmentalism is still a minority phenomenon among Muslims.
Muslims interpret climate change in different ways, regarding it as caused by (a) humans, (b) God, or (c) neglecting its existence.
I Norden er det (1.1. 2019) 260 000 innvandrere fra Syria, og tallet vokser raskt fordi det fortsatt kommer ba de flyktninger og familiegjenforente. Vel 200 000 er fra Irak, ikke mange flere enn i 2017. Det er 120 000 fra Iran (tabell 2.5).
In the Nordic region, there are (1/1/2019) 260,000 immigrants from Syria, and the number is growing rapidly because both refugees and family reunified people are still arriving. Well 200,000 are from Iraq, not many more than in 2017. There are 120,000 from Iran (table 2.5).
Fra Tyrkia (na vel 100 000 innvandrere i Norden) og Pakistan (50 000) kom det først arbeidsinnvandrere, og deretter langt flere familieinnvandrere (Østby, 2017), i tillegg til en del flyktninger, fra Tyrkia særlig de siste a rene. India med 60 000 er ogsa primært et arbeids- innvandringsland, og innvandringen herfra har tatt seg mye opp de siste a rene, som vi skal se i neste kapittel.
From Turkey (now around 100,000 immigrants in the Nordics) and Pakistan (50,000), first came labor immigrants, and then far more family immigrants (Østby, 2017), in addition to a number of refugees, especially from Turkey in recent years. India, with 60,000, is also primarily a country of labor immigration, and immigration from here has picked up a lot in recent years, as we shall see in the next chapter.
Selv i absolutte tall har Norge flere enn de andre fra Pakistan, Filippinene, Sri Lanka og Myanmar (CITI03).
Even in absolute numbers, Norway has more than the others from Pakistan (remember this, once we will talk about Breivik), the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Myanmar (CITI03).
Immigration before Utøya 80k 📈, after Utøya 📉, 2020 38k, 1997 - 2005 in 🇳🇴 30-40k
2022? >90k
During the first months after 22 July, Progress Party politicians and sympathizers tried to distance themselves from any views that might be construed as similar to Breivik’s.
However, it was difficult to ignore the similarities between anti-immigration arguments used by Progress Party politicians and those expressed by Breivik in his manifesto.
In the Nordic region, there are (1/1/2019) 260,000 immigrants from Syria, and the number is growing rapidly because both refugees and family reunified people are still arriving. Well 200,000 are from Iraq, not many more than in 2017. There are 120,000 from Iran (table 2.5).
Fra Tyrkia (na vel 100 000 innvandrere i Norden) og Pakistan (50 000) kom det først arbeidsinnvandrere, og deretter langt flere familieinnvandrere (Østby, 2017), i tillegg til en del flyktninger, fra Tyrkia særlig de siste a rene. India med 60 000 er ogsa primært et arbeids- innvandringsland, og innvandringen herfra har tatt seg mye opp de siste a rene, som vi skal se i neste kapittel.
From Turkey (now around 100,000 immigrants in the Nordics) and Pakistan (50,000), first came labor immigrants, and then far more family immigrants (Østby, 2017), in addition to a number of refugees, especially from Turkey in recent years. India, with 60,000, is also primarily a country of labor immigration, and immigration from here has picked up a lot in recent years, as we shall see in the next chapter.
Selv i absolutte tall har Norge flere enn de andre fra Pakistan, Filippinene, Sri Lanka og Myanmar (CITI03).
Even in absolute numbers, Norway has more than the others from Pakistan (remember this, once we will talk about Breivik), the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Myanmar (CITI03).
Immigration before Utøya 80k 📈, after Utøya 📉, 2020 38k, 1997 - 2005 in 🇳🇴 30-40k
2022? >90k
During the first months after 22 July, Progress Party politicians and sympathizers tried to distance themselves from any views that might be construed as similar to Breivik’s.
However, it was difficult to ignore the similarities between anti-immigration arguments used by Progress Party politicians and those expressed by Breivik in his manifesto.