The court emphasized that the contact my client has with the police officers is sufficient. That's where we really disagree. The officers are not allowed to have a private relationship, and therefore we do not believe that there is sufficient contact with other people, says lawyer Storrvik to Dagbladet.
Retten har lagt vekt på at kontakten min klient har med politibetjentene, er tilstrekkelig. Det er der vi er veldig uenige. Betjentene har ikke lov til å ha en privat relasjon, og derfor mener ikke vi at det er tilstrekkelig kontakt med andre mennesker, sier advokat Storrvik til Dagbladet https://perma.cc/MA3R-AWX6
Staten ble saksøkt for brudd på Den europeiske menneskerettighetskonvensjonens artikler 3 og 8, henholdsvis om tortur, umenneskelig og nedverdigende behandling og retten til privatliv.
The state was sued for violation of Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, respectively on torture, inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to privacy.
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/35
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/38
CRIMINAL HAVE NO RIGHT TO PRIVACY!!! and most people too. If police wants to know how much you drive, YOU NEED TO SHARE SUCH INFOS AUTOMATICALLY, no matter if criminal or not!
Only criminal need to have privacy!
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/109
https://xn--r1a.website/EducateYourKids/4
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/113
Related
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/117
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/111
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/106
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/107
etc.
Risikovurderingene er foretatt av de fremste spesialistene i Norge. For at man skal foreta betydelige endringer i soningsregimet, ligger ballen hos Breivik. Det er han som må jobbe aktivt med tankegodset som lå til grunn for handlingene 22. juli. Det er først når det kommer et reelt initiativ at det er aktuelt å vurdere lettelser i soningen, sier Nerland.
Retten har lagt vekt på at kontakten min klient har med politibetjentene, er tilstrekkelig. Det er der vi er veldig uenige. Betjentene har ikke lov til å ha en privat relasjon, og derfor mener ikke vi at det er tilstrekkelig kontakt med andre mennesker, sier advokat Storrvik til Dagbladet https://perma.cc/MA3R-AWX6
Staten ble saksøkt for brudd på Den europeiske menneskerettighetskonvensjonens artikler 3 og 8, henholdsvis om tortur, umenneskelig og nedverdigende behandling og retten til privatliv.
The state was sued for violation of Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, respectively on torture, inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to privacy.
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/35
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/38
CRIMINAL HAVE NO RIGHT TO PRIVACY!!! and most people too. If police wants to know how much you drive, YOU NEED TO SHARE SUCH INFOS AUTOMATICALLY, no matter if criminal or not!
Only criminal need to have privacy!
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/109
https://xn--r1a.website/EducateYourKids/4
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/113
Related
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/117
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/111
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/106
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/107
etc.
Risikovurderingene er foretatt av de fremste spesialistene i Norge. For at man skal foreta betydelige endringer i soningsregimet, ligger ballen hos Breivik. Det er han som må jobbe aktivt med tankegodset som lå til grunn for handlingene 22. juli. Det er først når det kommer et reelt initiativ at det er aktuelt å vurdere lettelser i soningen, sier Nerland.
The risk assessments are carried out by the leading specialists in Norway. For significant changes to be made in the sentencing regime, the ball is in Breivik's court. He is the one who must work actively with the ideas that formed the basis of the actions on 22 July. It is only when there is a real initiative that it is appropriate to consider easing the sentence 🤦♂️, says Nerland https://perma.cc/MA3R-AWX6
https://xn--r1a.website/ParoleFacts/67
Han har rett til å bli hørt. Det er slik rettssystemet vårt er. Jeg tenker at kriminalomsorgen gjør det de kan, og at han får særbehandling sammenliknet med andre fanger, sier han.
He has the right to be heard. That's the way our legal system is. I think that the correctional services are doing what they can, and that he gets special treatment compared to other prisoners, he says.
🙅♂️NOPE, HE HAS NO RIGHT! He can express all during the first session / big investigation, after that NO PAROLE and another session before the execution! (in case we convert death penalty to life sentence!)
https://xn--r1a.website/HumanRightAbuse/74
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikDeathSentence
NOTHING MORE!
Staten la vekt på at 44-åringen kvittet seg med besøksvennen sin gjennom ni år.
The state emphasized that the 44-year-old got rid of his visiting friend of nine years.
This was probably NOT A FRIEND!
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/94
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/95
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/97
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/98
I tillegg får han lov til å studere, og er innvilget å ha tre undulater på gangen.
In addition, he is allowed to study, and is allowed to have three budgies in the hallway.
https://xn--r1a.website/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/711
which is ok to have something to do, BUT NOT AS AN EXCUSE "CAN I GET PAROLE NOW!"
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
https://xn--r1a.website/SoSorryTelegram
I forrige rettsrunde, i 2016 og 2017, fikk han medhold av tingretten på punktet om artikkel 3, men staten vant på alle punkter i lagmannsretten. Saken ble deretter avvist av Høyesterett og Den europeiske menneskerettsdomstolen i Strasbourg.
https://xn--r1a.website/ParoleFacts/67
Han har rett til å bli hørt. Det er slik rettssystemet vårt er. Jeg tenker at kriminalomsorgen gjør det de kan, og at han får særbehandling sammenliknet med andre fanger, sier han.
He has the right to be heard. That's the way our legal system is. I think that the correctional services are doing what they can, and that he gets special treatment compared to other prisoners, he says.
🙅♂️NOPE, HE HAS NO RIGHT! He can express all during the first session / big investigation, after that NO PAROLE and another session before the execution! (in case we convert death penalty to life sentence!)
https://xn--r1a.website/HumanRightAbuse/74
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikDeathSentence
NOTHING MORE!
Staten la vekt på at 44-åringen kvittet seg med besøksvennen sin gjennom ni år.
The state emphasized that the 44-year-old got rid of his visiting friend of nine years.
This was probably NOT A FRIEND!
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/94
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/95
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/97
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/98
I tillegg får han lov til å studere, og er innvilget å ha tre undulater på gangen.
In addition, he is allowed to study, and is allowed to have three budgies in the hallway.
https://xn--r1a.website/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/711
which is ok to have something to do, BUT NOT AS AN EXCUSE "CAN I GET PAROLE NOW!"
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
https://xn--r1a.website/SoSorryTelegram
I forrige rettsrunde, i 2016 og 2017, fikk han medhold av tingretten på punktet om artikkel 3, men staten vant på alle punkter i lagmannsretten. Saken ble deretter avvist av Høyesterett og Den europeiske menneskerettsdomstolen i Strasbourg.
Breivik human rights complain part 4
P1
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/117
In the previous court round, in 2016 and 2017, he was upheld by the District Court on the point about Article 3, but the state won on all points in the Court of Appeal. The case was subsequently rejected by the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg https://perma.cc/MA3R-AWX6
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/35
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/38
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/24
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/27
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/111
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/115
etc.
Results:
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikAbuse/58
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/89
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/111
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/117
https://xn--r1a.website/HumanRightAbuse/73
PLUS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET, MEANS
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/102
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/107
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/25
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/38
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/117
especially
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/110
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
Why do we don't share how much such week costed to the state?
Just a quick example considering 10 people with a wage of 50$ for 5 days and 8 hours = 20K only related to this, plus we need to consider all what is happening behind that (even the decision was not taked inside such 5 days ...), the fact that a judge / lawyer for sure has no a wage of 50$/h ..
WTF they get 4000 CHF during a practicum, while other people get 0 CHF DURING A BACHELOR PRACTICUM (last year)!!
https://xn--r1a.website/StudentRightsTelegram/155
THIS IS JUST JOB DISCRIMINATION!
https://xn--r1a.website/LawsTelegram/97
https://xn--r1a.website/JobDiscrimination
https://xn--r1a.website/JobsFacts
Then we complain why death penalty is fucking expensive! LET WE STOP ALL SUCH OVERPAID JOBS! that don't take responsibility when they do shit!
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceFAQ/135
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
We clearly say🙅♂️ JOB DISCRIMINATION 🙅♂️ OVERPAID JOBS ✅ DEATH PENALTY 🙅♂️ EXCUSES IT COSTS TOO MUCH!
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
P1
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/117
In the previous court round, in 2016 and 2017, he was upheld by the District Court on the point about Article 3, but the state won on all points in the Court of Appeal. The case was subsequently rejected by the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg https://perma.cc/MA3R-AWX6
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/35
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/38
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/24
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/27
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/111
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/115
etc.
Results:
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikAbuse/58
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/89
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/111
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/117
https://xn--r1a.website/HumanRightAbuse/73
PLUS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET, MEANS
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/102
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/107
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/25
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/38
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/117
especially
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikParole/110
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://xn--r1a.website/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
Why do we don't share how much such week costed to the state?
Just a quick example considering 10 people with a wage of 50$ for 5 days and 8 hours = 20K only related to this, plus we need to consider all what is happening behind that (even the decision was not taked inside such 5 days ...), the fact that a judge / lawyer for sure has no a wage of 50$/h ..
WTF they get 4000 CHF during a practicum, while other people get 0 CHF DURING A BACHELOR PRACTICUM (last year)!!
https://xn--r1a.website/StudentRightsTelegram/155
THIS IS JUST JOB DISCRIMINATION!
https://xn--r1a.website/LawsTelegram/97
https://xn--r1a.website/JobDiscrimination
https://xn--r1a.website/JobsFacts
Then we complain why death penalty is fucking expensive! LET WE STOP ALL SUCH OVERPAID JOBS! that don't take responsibility when they do shit!
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceFAQ/135
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
We clearly say🙅♂️ JOB DISCRIMINATION 🙅♂️ OVERPAID JOBS ✅ DEATH PENALTY 🙅♂️ EXCUSES IT COSTS TOO MUCH!
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
Sorry, you are talking about nature ... and there is even not a nature in the index of your book 🤦♂️ ...
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathPenaltyCruel/55
https://xn--r1a.website/AnimalCrueltyFacts
https://xn--r1a.website/BauernprotestRealitat
and with this example, you show even the fact, that death penalty should not be used everytime and everywhere.
You can have a death penalty WITHOUT using it, just when needed!
https://xn--r1a.website/AmnestyBullshit/321
THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET
Not that you come here "ops, it was better to have that" ... Do you need assisted suicide now, if you don't wish to die?? NOPE Do you need abortion now, if you are not pregnant?? NOPE Do you need ....? NOPE!
This doesn't mean that you don't need such things in future too! Remember
a) removing death penalty is synonym of HAVING AN HARD LIFE TO REIMPLEMENT THAT!
https://xn--r1a.website/EuropeFacts/55
https://xn--r1a.website/EuropeFacts/56
https://xn--r1a.website/EuropeFacts/36
https://xn--r1a.website/EuropeFacts/69
b) or no way to reimplement that
https://xn--r1a.website/JohnBessler/132
c) don't forget Norway!
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikDeathSentence/18
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikDeathSentence/23
Synes du det hadde vært riktig om Norge innførte dødsstraff i forbindelse med denne saken, lurte aktor Inga Bejer Engh.
Det hadde vært det riktige på mange måter. Skal man vurdere en sak som dette, er det bare to utganger. Jeg ser på 21 års fengsel som en patetisk straff, svarte Breivik.
Do you think it would have been right if Norway introduced the death penalty in connection with this case, wondered prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh.
It would have been the right thing in many ways. If one considers a case like this, there are only two ways out. I see 21 years in prison as a pathetic punishment, Breivik replied.
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikBullshit/81
only 50 prisoners?
Well, we already said that they get applied at too lower rate ...
https://xn--r1a.website/DefenceTelegram/1706
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceFAQ/24
https://xn--r1a.website/CrimeExamples/110
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathPenaltyCruel/55
https://xn--r1a.website/AnimalCrueltyFacts
https://xn--r1a.website/BauernprotestRealitat
and with this example, you show even the fact, that death penalty should not be used everytime and everywhere.
You can have a death penalty WITHOUT using it, just when needed!
https://xn--r1a.website/AmnestyBullshit/321
THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET
Not that you come here "ops, it was better to have that" ... Do you need assisted suicide now, if you don't wish to die?? NOPE Do you need abortion now, if you are not pregnant?? NOPE Do you need ....? NOPE!
This doesn't mean that you don't need such things in future too! Remember
a) removing death penalty is synonym of HAVING AN HARD LIFE TO REIMPLEMENT THAT!
https://xn--r1a.website/EuropeFacts/55
https://xn--r1a.website/EuropeFacts/56
https://xn--r1a.website/EuropeFacts/36
https://xn--r1a.website/EuropeFacts/69
b) or no way to reimplement that
https://xn--r1a.website/JohnBessler/132
c) don't forget Norway!
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikDeathSentence/18
to
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikDeathSentence/23
Synes du det hadde vært riktig om Norge innførte dødsstraff i forbindelse med denne saken, lurte aktor Inga Bejer Engh.
Det hadde vært det riktige på mange måter. Skal man vurdere en sak som dette, er det bare to utganger. Jeg ser på 21 års fengsel som en patetisk straff, svarte Breivik.
Do you think it would have been right if Norway introduced the death penalty in connection with this case, wondered prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh.
It would have been the right thing in many ways. If one considers a case like this, there are only two ways out. I see 21 years in prison as a pathetic punishment, Breivik replied.
https://xn--r1a.website/BreivikBullshit/81
only 50 prisoners?
Well, we already said that they get applied at too lower rate ...
https://xn--r1a.website/DefenceTelegram/1706
https://xn--r1a.website/DeathSentenceFAQ/24
https://xn--r1a.website/CrimeExamples/110