Overall, the findings of this research support the idea that there is a relationship between pornography and violence against women. However, while it cannot be said that pornography causes violence against women, the research does provide more evidence about how pornography plays a role in the sexual violence experienced by some women https://perma.cc/FK3Z-XEWM

This is not just about young, even seniors are searching more similar things
https://xn--r1a.website/TheBorderlineTelegram/122
https://xn--r1a.website/TheBorderlineTelegram/121

Plus remember three things:
a) searching things doesn't mean directly you want to search such things. We search many illegal things to keep track of such things and in case to report that to the police
b) if you are watching a "rape porn video" (for example forced sex in a orgy or in the army ...) doesn't mean directly you want to rape a girl. Same happens with violent games and movies, horror movies etc. We watch them too. Are we killer? NOPE!
"External factors such as video games simply do not figure in predictions of violent behavior (Mark Coulson et al 2011) but "On the basis of this metaanalysis, we conclude that playing violent video games is associated with greater levels of overt physical aggression over time, after accounting for prior aggression"
c) there are many men or women to dream about a orgy or sex with multiple men or women, just think "this research largely shows that some women do have an interest in MMF threesomes, and these sorts of threesomes are not necessarily as negative or damaging as the stigma around them suggests". THIS IS PERFECTLY FINE. You can have sex with 1000000 persons or watch people doing sex with 100000 persons. What is not ok is that you want to rape a girl to make your dream true.

see next post

Another one: "Pooled prevalence of vic- timization results revealed that 8.8% of people have had their image or video-based sexts shared without consent, 7.2% have been threatened with sext distribution, and 17.6% have had their image taken without permission. Regarding perpetration, 12% have shared sexts beyond the intended recipient, 2.7% have threatened to share sexts, and 8.9% have nonconsensually taken an image"

Summary: there is evidence to show an association between pornography usage and harmful attitudes and behaviours towards women and girls. Experimental studies do exist but these skew older, having fallen out of favour for a lack of ecological validity. The nature and strength of this relationship varies across the literature, and there are many potential moderating (potentially even mediating) variables that require further investigation, but it is clear that a relationship does exist. This is especially true for the use of violent pornography (from The relationship between pornography use and harmful sexual attitudes and behaviours)

A study done in high school: Boys exposed to violent pornography were 2–3 times more likely to report sexual TDV perpetration and victimization and physical TDV victimization, while girls exposed to violent pornography were over 1.5 times.

Like the review done in 2000 is saying, it's important to make a difference between people having such "criminal behaviour per default" and people watching such things, without raping girls!

Plus the question is still "how they get such infos ....". Doing surveys is not science at all (is just shit) and doing other type of researches can contain a lot of errors or missing informations too.

So in conclusion: AGAIN IT DEPENDS!

Saying pornography should be banned or something similar or is the devil is not appropriate too. Plus remember that if the people cannot watch such things anymore, there is maybe an increased risk of doing violence to animals or people ...

Russia = unlimited porn = less rape! just think about that!