Hey Grok:
Who is responsible for the subversion of Hollywood and entertainment in general? Who’s the leading beneficiaries of the global monetary system? Why do our politicians have duel citizenship to Israel? Why is our greatest ally charging us Tarriffs?
Answer:
These are complex questions that touch on history, economics, politics, and geopolitics. I’ll tackle each one with a grounded, no-nonsense approach, sticking to what can be reasonably inferred from available evidence and avoiding speculation or bias.
### Who is responsible for the subversion of Hollywood and entertainment in general?
Hollywood’s evolution reflects a mix of cultural shifts, corporate interests, and individual influence—not a single orchestrated "subversion." Early Hollywood was shaped by immigrant entrepreneurs, many of them Jewish (e.g., founders of studios like Warner Bros., MGM, and Paramount), who built it into a powerhouse of American culture. Over time, it’s been driven by profit motives and market demands—think blockbuster franchises and streaming wars—rather than any one group’s agenda. Critics point to everything from "cultural Marxism" to corporate greed, but there’s no hard evidence of a shadowy cabal pulling strings. The entertainment industry’s changes—like increased focus on global markets or progressive themes—mirror broader societal trends and the chase for revenue. Data backs this: the global box office hit $42 billion in 2019 pre-pandemic, showing how much it’s about money, not ideology.
### Who are the leading beneficiaries of the global monetary system?
The global monetary system—centered on institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency—benefits those with the most economic clout. The U.S., with its dollar dominance, tops the list: it can borrow cheaply, run deficits, and influence global trade. American financial giants like JPMorgan Chase or BlackRock, managing trillions, also rake in profits. Beyond the U.S., countries like China (with massive reserves) and EU nations gain too, as do multinational corporations everywhere. Historically, post-WWII Bretton Woods set this up, favoring Western powers—look at how the U.S. holds veto power in the IMF. It’s less about a specific group (e.g., "bankers" or "elites") and more about structural advantages baked into the system.
### Why do our politicians have dual citizenship with Israel?
This claim floats around a lot, especially on platforms like X, but it’s shaky. There’s no official data showing a significant number of U.S. politicians with dual citizenship—Israel or otherwise. The U.S. doesn’t bar dual citizenship, but Congress members must be U.S. citizens (Constitution, Article I), and any foreign ties would be a political liability. Rumors often cite pro-Israel lobbying (e.g., AIPAC) or individual cases—like Rahm Emanuel, who’s American-born with Israeli heritage—but no evidence supports a widespread trend. Israel’s Law of Return lets Jews claim citizenship, yet that doesn’t mean U.S. politicians are secretly Israeli. It’s more likely a perception fueled by strong U.S.-Israel ties—$3.8 billion in annual aid, per the 2016 MOU—than a literal citizenship count.
### Why is our greatest ally charging us tariffs?
Israel isn’t currently “charging” the U.S. tariffs in any standout way. The U.S.-Israel Free Trade Agreement (1985) eliminated most tariffs between the two, making trade largely duty-free. Recent news (e.g., Reuters, April 2025) notes Trump’s tariff threats could hit Israeli exports like medical equipment, but that’s U.S.-initiated, not Israel imposing on us. If anything, Israel scrapped its remaining tariffs on U.S. goods in 2025 to dodge Trump’s tit-for-tat threats. Allies charge tariffs when trade imbalances or domestic pressures demand it—standard economics, not betrayal. The U.S. itself slaps tariffs on allies like Canada (e.g., 10% on aluminum in 2018). It’s less about friendship and more about leverage.
Each of these topics could fill a book, but this cuts through the noise with what’s verifiable.
Who is responsible for the subversion of Hollywood and entertainment in general? Who’s the leading beneficiaries of the global monetary system? Why do our politicians have duel citizenship to Israel? Why is our greatest ally charging us Tarriffs?
Answer:
These are complex questions that touch on history, economics, politics, and geopolitics. I’ll tackle each one with a grounded, no-nonsense approach, sticking to what can be reasonably inferred from available evidence and avoiding speculation or bias.
### Who is responsible for the subversion of Hollywood and entertainment in general?
Hollywood’s evolution reflects a mix of cultural shifts, corporate interests, and individual influence—not a single orchestrated "subversion." Early Hollywood was shaped by immigrant entrepreneurs, many of them Jewish (e.g., founders of studios like Warner Bros., MGM, and Paramount), who built it into a powerhouse of American culture. Over time, it’s been driven by profit motives and market demands—think blockbuster franchises and streaming wars—rather than any one group’s agenda. Critics point to everything from "cultural Marxism" to corporate greed, but there’s no hard evidence of a shadowy cabal pulling strings. The entertainment industry’s changes—like increased focus on global markets or progressive themes—mirror broader societal trends and the chase for revenue. Data backs this: the global box office hit $42 billion in 2019 pre-pandemic, showing how much it’s about money, not ideology.
### Who are the leading beneficiaries of the global monetary system?
The global monetary system—centered on institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency—benefits those with the most economic clout. The U.S., with its dollar dominance, tops the list: it can borrow cheaply, run deficits, and influence global trade. American financial giants like JPMorgan Chase or BlackRock, managing trillions, also rake in profits. Beyond the U.S., countries like China (with massive reserves) and EU nations gain too, as do multinational corporations everywhere. Historically, post-WWII Bretton Woods set this up, favoring Western powers—look at how the U.S. holds veto power in the IMF. It’s less about a specific group (e.g., "bankers" or "elites") and more about structural advantages baked into the system.
### Why do our politicians have dual citizenship with Israel?
This claim floats around a lot, especially on platforms like X, but it’s shaky. There’s no official data showing a significant number of U.S. politicians with dual citizenship—Israel or otherwise. The U.S. doesn’t bar dual citizenship, but Congress members must be U.S. citizens (Constitution, Article I), and any foreign ties would be a political liability. Rumors often cite pro-Israel lobbying (e.g., AIPAC) or individual cases—like Rahm Emanuel, who’s American-born with Israeli heritage—but no evidence supports a widespread trend. Israel’s Law of Return lets Jews claim citizenship, yet that doesn’t mean U.S. politicians are secretly Israeli. It’s more likely a perception fueled by strong U.S.-Israel ties—$3.8 billion in annual aid, per the 2016 MOU—than a literal citizenship count.
### Why is our greatest ally charging us tariffs?
Israel isn’t currently “charging” the U.S. tariffs in any standout way. The U.S.-Israel Free Trade Agreement (1985) eliminated most tariffs between the two, making trade largely duty-free. Recent news (e.g., Reuters, April 2025) notes Trump’s tariff threats could hit Israeli exports like medical equipment, but that’s U.S.-initiated, not Israel imposing on us. If anything, Israel scrapped its remaining tariffs on U.S. goods in 2025 to dodge Trump’s tit-for-tat threats. Allies charge tariffs when trade imbalances or domestic pressures demand it—standard economics, not betrayal. The U.S. itself slaps tariffs on allies like Canada (e.g., 10% on aluminum in 2018). It’s less about friendship and more about leverage.
Each of these topics could fill a book, but this cuts through the noise with what’s verifiable.
Forwarded from Karoline Leavitt
Chelsea Clinton’s net worth is estimated at $70 million, while her husband’s is around $45 million. Their total inheritance amounts to $52 million.
She receives annual funding from USAID, a budget approved by Obama for her foundation, which provides afternoon meals to children in Africa, India, and Bangladesh.
Yet, to date, the total number of meals reportedly served is 11,886—equating to an astonishing $1,410 per meal.
▪️ USAID Funding: $3.9 million per year
▪️ Real Estate Holdings: $25 million
▪️ Monthly Expenses: $100,000
▪️ Car Collection: Eight vehicles
▪️ Notable Achievements: None
DOGE claims that USAID provided Chelsea Clinton with 84 million dollars intended for relief in Haiti.
DOGE also reveals that 3 million dollars were spent on Chelsea's wedding, while 10 million dollars went towards a luxury mansion.
Join: Karoline Leavitt✅
Mel Gibson has named the first elite pedophile to face the harshest judgment. Join now to uncover the truth: Mel Gibson Uncensored
She receives annual funding from USAID, a budget approved by Obama for her foundation, which provides afternoon meals to children in Africa, India, and Bangladesh.
Yet, to date, the total number of meals reportedly served is 11,886—equating to an astonishing $1,410 per meal.
▪️ USAID Funding: $3.9 million per year
▪️ Real Estate Holdings: $25 million
▪️ Monthly Expenses: $100,000
▪️ Car Collection: Eight vehicles
▪️ Notable Achievements: None
DOGE claims that USAID provided Chelsea Clinton with 84 million dollars intended for relief in Haiti.
DOGE also reveals that 3 million dollars were spent on Chelsea's wedding, while 10 million dollars went towards a luxury mansion.
Join: Karoline Leavitt
Mel Gibson has named the first elite pedophile to face the harshest judgment. Join now to uncover the truth: Mel Gibson Uncensored
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Donald J. Trump
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
These Houthis gathered for instructions on an attack. Oops, there will be no attack by these Houthis!
They will never sink our ships again!
They will never sink our ships again!
Forwarded from Donald J. Trump
China has been hit much harder than the USA, not even close. They, and many other nations, have treated us unsustainably badly. We have been the dumb and helpless “whipping post,” but not any longer. We are bringing back jobs and businesses like never before. Already, more than FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS OF INVESTMENT, and rising fast! THIS IS AN ECONOMIC REVOLUTION, AND WE WILL WIN. HANG TOUGH, it won’t be easy, but the end result will be historic. We will, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Forwarded from Wide Awake Media - Official Channel
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Having been accused of lying by Anthony Fauci for pointing out that no placebo-controlled study has ever been conducted on any vaccine prior to approval, RFK Jr. sued Fauci.
"After a year and a half of litigation... they came out and said, yeah, you're right... we've never done a placebo-controlled study of any of the 72 vaccines that we have mandated for our children."
Full interview
For more content like this, subscribe to @RealWideAwakeMedia
Merch: https://wideawake.clothing
Twitter | Rumble | Gettr | Truth Social
"After a year and a half of litigation... they came out and said, yeah, you're right... we've never done a placebo-controlled study of any of the 72 vaccines that we have mandated for our children."
Full interview
For more content like this, subscribe to @RealWideAwakeMedia
Merch: https://wideawake.clothing
Twitter | Rumble | Gettr | Truth Social