This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍40🔥17👀8❤2🤯1😎1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
At least the “protests” get all the retarded ones in one place to be easily identified
💯108👍11🤣9❤7🤯5😈3🖕1
Hey Grok:
Who is responsible for the subversion of Hollywood and entertainment in general? Who’s the leading beneficiaries of the global monetary system? Why do our politicians have duel citizenship to Israel? Why is our greatest ally charging us Tarriffs?
Answer:
These are complex questions that touch on history, economics, politics, and geopolitics. I’ll tackle each one with a grounded, no-nonsense approach, sticking to what can be reasonably inferred from available evidence and avoiding speculation or bias.
### Who is responsible for the subversion of Hollywood and entertainment in general?
Hollywood’s evolution reflects a mix of cultural shifts, corporate interests, and individual influence—not a single orchestrated "subversion." Early Hollywood was shaped by immigrant entrepreneurs, many of them Jewish (e.g., founders of studios like Warner Bros., MGM, and Paramount), who built it into a powerhouse of American culture. Over time, it’s been driven by profit motives and market demands—think blockbuster franchises and streaming wars—rather than any one group’s agenda. Critics point to everything from "cultural Marxism" to corporate greed, but there’s no hard evidence of a shadowy cabal pulling strings. The entertainment industry’s changes—like increased focus on global markets or progressive themes—mirror broader societal trends and the chase for revenue. Data backs this: the global box office hit $42 billion in 2019 pre-pandemic, showing how much it’s about money, not ideology.
### Who are the leading beneficiaries of the global monetary system?
The global monetary system—centered on institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency—benefits those with the most economic clout. The U.S., with its dollar dominance, tops the list: it can borrow cheaply, run deficits, and influence global trade. American financial giants like JPMorgan Chase or BlackRock, managing trillions, also rake in profits. Beyond the U.S., countries like China (with massive reserves) and EU nations gain too, as do multinational corporations everywhere. Historically, post-WWII Bretton Woods set this up, favoring Western powers—look at how the U.S. holds veto power in the IMF. It’s less about a specific group (e.g., "bankers" or "elites") and more about structural advantages baked into the system.
### Why do our politicians have dual citizenship with Israel?
This claim floats around a lot, especially on platforms like X, but it’s shaky. There’s no official data showing a significant number of U.S. politicians with dual citizenship—Israel or otherwise. The U.S. doesn’t bar dual citizenship, but Congress members must be U.S. citizens (Constitution, Article I), and any foreign ties would be a political liability. Rumors often cite pro-Israel lobbying (e.g., AIPAC) or individual cases—like Rahm Emanuel, who’s American-born with Israeli heritage—but no evidence supports a widespread trend. Israel’s Law of Return lets Jews claim citizenship, yet that doesn’t mean U.S. politicians are secretly Israeli. It’s more likely a perception fueled by strong U.S.-Israel ties—$3.8 billion in annual aid, per the 2016 MOU—than a literal citizenship count.
### Why is our greatest ally charging us tariffs?
Israel isn’t currently “charging” the U.S. tariffs in any standout way. The U.S.-Israel Free Trade Agreement (1985) eliminated most tariffs between the two, making trade largely duty-free. Recent news (e.g., Reuters, April 2025) notes Trump’s tariff threats could hit Israeli exports like medical equipment, but that’s U.S.-initiated, not Israel imposing on us. If anything, Israel scrapped its remaining tariffs on U.S. goods in 2025 to dodge Trump’s tit-for-tat threats. Allies charge tariffs when trade imbalances or domestic pressures demand it—standard economics, not betrayal. The U.S. itself slaps tariffs on allies like Canada (e.g., 10% on aluminum in 2018). It’s less about friendship and more about leverage.
Each of these topics could fill a book, but this cuts through the noise with what’s verifiable.
Who is responsible for the subversion of Hollywood and entertainment in general? Who’s the leading beneficiaries of the global monetary system? Why do our politicians have duel citizenship to Israel? Why is our greatest ally charging us Tarriffs?
Answer:
These are complex questions that touch on history, economics, politics, and geopolitics. I’ll tackle each one with a grounded, no-nonsense approach, sticking to what can be reasonably inferred from available evidence and avoiding speculation or bias.
### Who is responsible for the subversion of Hollywood and entertainment in general?
Hollywood’s evolution reflects a mix of cultural shifts, corporate interests, and individual influence—not a single orchestrated "subversion." Early Hollywood was shaped by immigrant entrepreneurs, many of them Jewish (e.g., founders of studios like Warner Bros., MGM, and Paramount), who built it into a powerhouse of American culture. Over time, it’s been driven by profit motives and market demands—think blockbuster franchises and streaming wars—rather than any one group’s agenda. Critics point to everything from "cultural Marxism" to corporate greed, but there’s no hard evidence of a shadowy cabal pulling strings. The entertainment industry’s changes—like increased focus on global markets or progressive themes—mirror broader societal trends and the chase for revenue. Data backs this: the global box office hit $42 billion in 2019 pre-pandemic, showing how much it’s about money, not ideology.
### Who are the leading beneficiaries of the global monetary system?
The global monetary system—centered on institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and the U.S. dollar as the reserve currency—benefits those with the most economic clout. The U.S., with its dollar dominance, tops the list: it can borrow cheaply, run deficits, and influence global trade. American financial giants like JPMorgan Chase or BlackRock, managing trillions, also rake in profits. Beyond the U.S., countries like China (with massive reserves) and EU nations gain too, as do multinational corporations everywhere. Historically, post-WWII Bretton Woods set this up, favoring Western powers—look at how the U.S. holds veto power in the IMF. It’s less about a specific group (e.g., "bankers" or "elites") and more about structural advantages baked into the system.
### Why do our politicians have dual citizenship with Israel?
This claim floats around a lot, especially on platforms like X, but it’s shaky. There’s no official data showing a significant number of U.S. politicians with dual citizenship—Israel or otherwise. The U.S. doesn’t bar dual citizenship, but Congress members must be U.S. citizens (Constitution, Article I), and any foreign ties would be a political liability. Rumors often cite pro-Israel lobbying (e.g., AIPAC) or individual cases—like Rahm Emanuel, who’s American-born with Israeli heritage—but no evidence supports a widespread trend. Israel’s Law of Return lets Jews claim citizenship, yet that doesn’t mean U.S. politicians are secretly Israeli. It’s more likely a perception fueled by strong U.S.-Israel ties—$3.8 billion in annual aid, per the 2016 MOU—than a literal citizenship count.
### Why is our greatest ally charging us tariffs?
Israel isn’t currently “charging” the U.S. tariffs in any standout way. The U.S.-Israel Free Trade Agreement (1985) eliminated most tariffs between the two, making trade largely duty-free. Recent news (e.g., Reuters, April 2025) notes Trump’s tariff threats could hit Israeli exports like medical equipment, but that’s U.S.-initiated, not Israel imposing on us. If anything, Israel scrapped its remaining tariffs on U.S. goods in 2025 to dodge Trump’s tit-for-tat threats. Allies charge tariffs when trade imbalances or domestic pressures demand it—standard economics, not betrayal. The U.S. itself slaps tariffs on allies like Canada (e.g., 10% on aluminum in 2018). It’s less about friendship and more about leverage.
Each of these topics could fill a book, but this cuts through the noise with what’s verifiable.
🤣35👍12❤8🖕4🔥3😁1🤨1