'Masks reduce racism’ study is latest sign US medical establishment is insanely, perilously woke.

A new study in the New England Journal of Medicine purports to show that mask policies in schools work to contain COVID. But that’s not all: The authors conclude, “We believe that universal masking may be especially useful for mitigating effects of structural racism in schools, including potential deepening of educational inequities.”

Sure, masks help fix structural racism. Why not? And the next study will show masking fights climate change.

Source

YouTube marks the official World Government Summit video about a new world order as spreading a conspiracy theory.

This is a disaster. No child or human being should be taking these things.

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/11/vaccine-disaster-myopericarditis-rates-off-the-charts-23300-suspected-cases-per-million/ref/8/

🕺🏻Trusting "the science" in action

New G20 Agenda 2030 Document calls for Global Vaccine Passports

G-20 leaders have adopted a joint declaration calling for the establishment of “global digital health networks” that build on existing digital COVID-19 vaccine passports…

https://expose-news.com/2022/11/18/g20-agenda-2030-global-vaccine-passports/

Follow The Expose

For those that don't know, Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion is available to watch and share in over 25 languages:

Afrikaans
Albanian
Bosnian
Brazilian Sign Language
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Bulgarian
Croatian
Czech
Dutch
English
Finnish
French
German
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Italian
Japanese
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Vietnamese

Watch the film for free in 4K resolution here: oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective

It's also available on Rumble | Odysee | BrandNewTube | The Highwire | EpochTV and many other platforms.

Thank you to everyone that has dedicated their time and energy to making these translations and sharing the film with friends and family. This has been a massive undertaking and a remarkable effort by many across the world.

Humbled and grateful. Onward we go.

FDA Says Telling People Not To Take Ivermectin For COVID-19 Was "Just A Recommendation"

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) telling people to “stop” taking ivermectin for COVID-19 was informal and just a recommendation, government lawyers argued during a recent hearing.

“The cited statements were not directives. They were not mandatory. They were recommendations. They said what parties should do. They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19. They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it’s prohibited or it’s unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin,” Isaac Belfer, one of the lawyers, told the court during the Nov. 1 hearing in federal court in Texas.

“They use informal language, that is true,” he also said, adding that, “it’s conversational but not mandatory.”

The FDA created a webpage in 2021 titled “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19” and later posted a link to the page on Twitter while writing: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” A second post stated: “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.”

In a separate page, the FDA said: “Q: Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? A: No.”

Those actions interfered with the doctors’ practice of medicine, violating the laws including the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the lawsuit alleges.

Source

TOMORROW: Why the Depopulation Agenda is Real & What We Can Do About It | Dr Mike Yeadon at General Assembly #66

Join us tomorrow, November 21 at 7 pm UTC/GMT (2pm EST) in the WCH Newsroom to hear from Dr Mike Yeadon, who will be giving a presentation on what we can do about the depopulation agenda.

Mike Yeadon, a retired pharmacologist, was previously vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory at Pfizer and is co-founder and former CEO of the biotechnology company Ziarco.

Dr Yeadon has more than 30 years of experience leading new medicine research in the pharmaceutical industry.

Dr Robert Malone and Dr Roger Hunter will also be speaking.

Watch the meeting and join the live chat:
➨ https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/newsroom/

📩 NEWSLETTER | 💪 JOIN US

📌 Follow WCH:
➨ @WCH_org

This meeting will also be live on YouTube, Facebook, Odysee, Rumble, and Gettr. Tell a friend!

UK to launch new digital ID technology next month as part of nationwide digital ID push

The UK government is pushing ahead with its nationwide digital ID plans, despite half of the responses to its public consultation on digital identity opposing the idea.

The government’s digital ID plans were announced in the same month that the UK government’s Online Safety Bill began its legislative journey. This bill mandates the implementation of identity and age verification technology on many large online platforms.

This current attempt to introduce digital ID comes almost a decade after the UK government launched its 2013 digital ID project “Verify” which was blasted by the National Audit Office and internal Parliamentary committees for “failing the public” and missing all of its performance targets.

UK to launch new digital ID technology next month as part of nationwide digital ID push

https://ift.tt/bfVeRJo FOLLOW: @reclaimthenet

The UK Online Safety Bill explained: A reckless threat to free speech

https://ift.tt/GKjXqon FOLLOW:
@reclaimthenet

Rishi Sunak has urged the NHS to embrace the use of robots as the health service prepares to cut its workforce by half in a drastic attempt to cut costs.

Growing NHS waiting lists have left a record 2.5m people unable to work because of long-term sickness, with an extra 133,000 people falling out of the workforce for health reasons in the three months to September alone.

Source

"Regulators around the world pretended to review what Pharma had submitted, which was a pretend dossier. And that explains why the trials weren't done properly, why the toxicology was done incompletely. It's because they knew the FDA, EMA etc were not going to be marking their homework. But instead that it was going to be approved under something called Other Transaction Authority."

Dr Mike Yeadon in conversation with members of the World Council for Health yesterday evening. This was an incredibly insightful talk that I'd highly recommend watching in full here.

The interview that Dr Yeadon is referring to is available here.

Credit to World Council for Health

Prof Norman Fenton: MHRA and BBC fail to meet their own deadline for responding to complaints about "Unvaccinated"

23 November 2022 UPDATE:

Jeremy Hayes The BBC Complaints Director has finally provided their response.

Unsurprisingly it's a complete whitewash...

Read more

Homes with smart meters are being moved to pay as you go plans without consent and plunged into darkness - by remote control.

Thanks to the high-tech devices - which show your energy usage in real time and send meter readings automatically to suppliers - energy firms can switch customers on to different tariffs remotely.

And, crucially, if a household does not pay, gets into debt or fails to pay bills on time, the supplier can use a smart meter to turn off their power. All it takes is the click of a button in an office hundreds of miles away.

By the end of this winter, consumer charity Citizens Advice estimates 180,000 households will have been switched to prepayment plans via their smart meter.

The widespread adoption of smart meters means companies no longer have to come face-to-face with the people they are cutting off.

The solution here? Resist getting one.

Source

Ofcom ‘will get more power than spies’ to monitor apps

Ofcom is being given authority under the Online Safety Bill to force tech companies to crack down on terrorism and child abuse content on private messaging apps such as WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Telegram and Signal.

These services are “end-to-end” encrypted, meaning that only the users know the content of messages, not the platforms. Under the bill, however, the regulator would be able to order companies to use technology to scan messages to root out terrorism or child abuse. A failure to comply would result in a fine of up to 10 per cent of the company’s worldwide revenue.

The powers granted to Ofcom “permits the state to compel [tech firms] to carry out surveillance of the content of communications on a generalised and widespread basis”, Matthew Ryder, a human rights barrister, said in a legal opinion commissioned by Index on Censorship, a free speech organisation.

Ofcom would not need prior authorisation for issuing a demand for scanning messages and there is no independent oversight of such powers, Ryder said. This means that Ofcom would be able to act more freely than GCHQ does, which has a far more limited power of surveillance governed by the Investigatory Powers Act.

Source

https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/toxic-by-design-big-pharma-experts-speak-out

A conversation between two, good colleagues of mine. Their experience helped each of them clearly understand that we were (& still are) being lied to.

The new information, for those who haven’t read up on Katherine Watt, is that the line of authorisation of these experimental gene injections isn’t the Food & Drug Administration. An astonishing realisation.

Best wishes
Mike

THE NORTH UNITES
Leeds
Saturday 26th November 2022

More info available here 👉🏻 https://xn--r1a.website/TheNorthUnites

"Understanding and neutralising covid-19 misinformation and disinformation"

A disgraceful article published two days ago in the BMJ. Yuxi Wang, John Bye, Karam Bales et al appeal to shut down all opposing voices to Government health policy, including in the Covid-19 Public Inquiry.

"During the covid-19 pandemic, several groups have been active in opposing evidence based public health measures."

"A rapid rise in misinformation and disinformation in digital and physical environments over a short period is called an infodemic"

"Active management of infodemics must form part of a comprehensive pandemic response"

"Further investigations into the social and public health effects of misinformation groups are needed to inform policy."

"The covid-19 inquiry team has now reported on the consultation about its terms of reference. Those analysing the responses found that 15% of submissions were “campaigns and duplicates.” This raises the question of what a campaign is. When different groups submit versions of the same text, the connection is obvious. But other links are less obvious: for example, the BBC reports that UsForThem, which has attracted high level support from politicians in its campaign against restrictions in schools, has links with the Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART), which in turn has worked on a campaign against children being vaccinated against covid-19. HART, meanwhile, shares members with groups that have opposed vaccination, such as the UK Medical Freedom Alliance and the Children’s Health Defence.”

How and why was this published? THIS is anti-science.

Source