Why do some Trump supporters jump off the bandwagon at every twist and turn?
Seems to me that aligning yourself with his enemies while he's doing everything to save our Republic is shortsighted at best.
You're welcome to disagree, of course. But if you do, please tell me who the alternative is and how they'd be able to rise to the presidency before the Republic has tanked.
Personally, one of the reasons I trust the guy because of everything he's done for us to date. Near as I can tell, we're in a 'Trump or bust' type scenario.
Seems to me that aligning yourself with his enemies while he's doing everything to save our Republic is shortsighted at best.
You're welcome to disagree, of course. But if you do, please tell me who the alternative is and how they'd be able to rise to the presidency before the Republic has tanked.
Personally, one of the reasons I trust the guy because of everything he's done for us to date. Near as I can tell, we're in a 'Trump or bust' type scenario.
💯306👍35🔥12🙏5❤4🥴4👏1
You can't fix an education system that is responsible for these statistics by throwing more money at it—especially since that tried-and-true approach has only delivered abject failure to date.
The problem is with the system itself. And this is especially true once you come to understand that it was always intentional.
The only way to resolve the problem is to destroy it and start anew...only without communist saboteurs running the show this time.
The problem is with the system itself. And this is especially true once you come to understand that it was always intentional.
The only way to resolve the problem is to destroy it and start anew...only without communist saboteurs running the show this time.
💯247👍13😢7❤6🤯3
Maybe I remembered it wrong.
Does the saying go, "When the going gets tough, the tough decide the best course of action is to light their hair on fire and run around screaming that the sky is falling at every twist and turn?"
Does the saying go, "When the going gets tough, the tough decide the best course of action is to light their hair on fire and run around screaming that the sky is falling at every twist and turn?"
🤣209😁44💯12❤4
RE: The conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud going on in California.
We have Sean McCluskie, who worked for Xavier Becerra (California Attorney General) as his chief of staff, and Greg Campbell, a prominent CA lobbyist, Both admitted to guilt as co-conspirators in a federal bank and wire fraud scheme involving Dana Williamson.
I'm not going to delve into the nitty-gritty about the whole case because that's not what I'm getting at. But know that both of them fully cooperated with federal prosecutors having turned state's evidence.
Now, about Dana, who is currently facing 23 federal charges—including conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, tax fraud, and obstruction of justice.
She's an interesting figure, IMO, not only because of her tight//high-level association with Gavin Newsom as his former chief of staff, but she was a key campaign operative for him due to her role in managing funds. 💰
Oh, and her deep connection to CA politics go back to working with none other than frm. Gov Jerry Brown.
That said, I believe it's fair to assume that she's a prime candidate for similarly turning state's evidence against Newsom (and others), given the fact she's potentially facing a scant 360 years in prison.
*If convicted on all counts and had to serve them consecutively.
This is important b/c the chances are that she knows all about mountains of fraud involving the highest-level political figures in the state...and it's for that reason that Gavin and his connected CA family and friends should be freaking out about it behind the scenes.
In related news, Dana's life is almost certainly in jeopardy.
This is only going to get spicier.
We have Sean McCluskie, who worked for Xavier Becerra (California Attorney General) as his chief of staff, and Greg Campbell, a prominent CA lobbyist, Both admitted to guilt as co-conspirators in a federal bank and wire fraud scheme involving Dana Williamson.
I'm not going to delve into the nitty-gritty about the whole case because that's not what I'm getting at. But know that both of them fully cooperated with federal prosecutors having turned state's evidence.
Now, about Dana, who is currently facing 23 federal charges—including conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, tax fraud, and obstruction of justice.
She's an interesting figure, IMO, not only because of her tight//high-level association with Gavin Newsom as his former chief of staff, but she was a key campaign operative for him due to her role in managing funds. 💰
Oh, and her deep connection to CA politics go back to working with none other than frm. Gov Jerry Brown.
That said, I believe it's fair to assume that she's a prime candidate for similarly turning state's evidence against Newsom (and others), given the fact she's potentially facing a scant 360 years in prison.
*If convicted on all counts and had to serve them consecutively.
This is important b/c the chances are that she knows all about mountains of fraud involving the highest-level political figures in the state...and it's for that reason that Gavin and his connected CA family and friends should be freaking out about it behind the scenes.
In related news, Dana's life is almost certainly in jeopardy.
This is only going to get spicier.
🔥141❤12😁6💯4👍3
We don't have to live like this.
______
Blue State: Suspect Accused of Assaulting Woman Freed Without Bail- Returns in an Hour Later to Assault Same Victim Again
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/blue-state-suspect-accused-assaulting-woman-freed-without/
______
Blue State: Suspect Accused of Assaulting Woman Freed Without Bail- Returns in an Hour Later to Assault Same Victim Again
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/11/blue-state-suspect-accused-assaulting-woman-freed-without/
🤬179💩24🤯11😈10❤3🌚1🍌1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
RE: Jesse Watters segment on Trump, the Democrats, and the ongoing Epstein hoax.
❤53🔥21🫡1
Consider the absolute gravity of the moment, and then watch Trump's body language. Listen to what he says and how he says it.
Do you get the impression that we're going to descend back to an apocalyptic, deep-state-controlled hellscape?
I ask because I'm not picking up those vibes at all. In fact, he keeps referring to us transitioning into America's golden age.
IMHO, he legitimately serves as our human barometer for gauging how things are going big-picture, even if it's a rough go at times.
This (restoring our Republic) was never going to be easy, folks. But the arc of the larger storyline is only trending in our direction
Do you get the impression that we're going to descend back to an apocalyptic, deep-state-controlled hellscape?
I ask because I'm not picking up those vibes at all. In fact, he keeps referring to us transitioning into America's golden age.
IMHO, he legitimately serves as our human barometer for gauging how things are going big-picture, even if it's a rough go at times.
This (restoring our Republic) was never going to be easy, folks. But the arc of the larger storyline is only trending in our direction
👍114💯92❤20🔥4👏2☃1
Who has a better grasp of what's going on behind the scenes, you or Trump (being the President of the United States)?
💯136❤50😁13🤔3
Forwarded from Parallel 8 Media — 8traQ
ICYMI The Friday Night Huddle with Julie Donuts, Betsy & Rachel Writeside Blonde.
How did I handle all the estrogen?
Catch the replay and find out!
https://rumble.com/v71o708-friday-night-huddle-ep-31-julie-donuts-rachel-and-betsy.html
How did I handle all the estrogen?
Catch the replay and find out!
https://rumble.com/v71o708-friday-night-huddle-ep-31-julie-donuts-rachel-and-betsy.html
❤38👍16😁13
The Secret Service security detail for Kamala Harris drove her within 20 ft of the location of the infamous J6 pipe bomb not once, but twice, as they entered and exited the parking structure at the DNC's DC Headquarters.
I mention that becuase given how politically charged the whole so-called "insurrection" was, and the savage political war we've seen waged in the interim since, why haven't the Democrats argued one time that this could have easily been considered an assassination attempt against her?
It doesn't even matter if it's true. Just think about all the sympathy, political capital, and money they could have scored/raised by making this simple argument.
I mean, given the outrageous amount of gaslighting the public fell victim to regarding the entire J6 narrative, many would believe this was plausible—yet they never have.
Weird, right?
I mention that becuase given how politically charged the whole so-called "insurrection" was, and the savage political war we've seen waged in the interim since, why haven't the Democrats argued one time that this could have easily been considered an assassination attempt against her?
It doesn't even matter if it's true. Just think about all the sympathy, political capital, and money they could have scored/raised by making this simple argument.
I mean, given the outrageous amount of gaslighting the public fell victim to regarding the entire J6 narrative, many would believe this was plausible—yet they never have.
Weird, right?
🤔91💯76❤6👀5