This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In 🇳🇴, 🇳🇱 etc. people are saying "we don't close our doors". Well this is the problem!
Maybe there is less criminality and people are more honest, BUT remember not all people are in such category!
@UtoyaMassaker was a good example. This video is another good example.
Again, no matter if you think to be safe, NEVER trust ANYONE! and do most things to keep you safe.
Closing doors is the first step ... even if this will not fix all problems ...
Backup by @IsraelWarBullshit
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Maybe there is less criminality and people are more honest, BUT remember not all people are in such category!
@UtoyaMassaker was a good example. This video is another good example.
Again, no matter if you think to be safe, NEVER trust ANYONE! and do most things to keep you safe.
Closing doors is the first step ... even if this will not fix all problems ...
Backup by @IsraelWarBullshit
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
When Israel is sharing bullshit ...
Genocide and Suicide Terrorism - Part 2
Part 1: https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/945
In Gaza, after the separation barrier was completed and the Second Intifada had begun, most militants were in fact compelled to turn away from suicide bombing and toward guerilla attacks and the launching of Qassam rockets and mortar shells at Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip and Israel proper.
No such launches were recorded in 2000, but 516 took place in 2001. Their number rose steadily for the next three years to 1,475 in 2004 and then tapered off somewhat to just over 1,000 in 2005 (Intelligence and Information Center 2006, 24; Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2007).
In the West Bank, the situation was different. The rate of killing of Palestinians by Israel was only about half as high as in Gaza. At the same time, the frequency of Palestinian deaths was more sensitive to the threat level than was the case in Gaza. The correlation between the monthly number of Palestinian deaths and the monthly number of suicide missions originating in the region was strong and in the direction that Marshall’s rational choice theory would lead one to expect.
Thus, when threat was high in the West Bank, the killing of Palestinians by the Israeli state rose. When threat was low, the killing of Palestinians dropped off.
Interestingly, frontier-like Gaza was less subject to assassinations than was the West Bank. Nearly twice as many assassinations took place in the West Bank (135) as in Gaza (72).
In addition, a chorus of human rights groups, media outlets, the United Nations, and European governments soon criticized Israeli state violence, calling for constraint and reminding Israel that state violence against civilians violates international human rights norms that have become deeply entrenched since World War II.
About suicide terrorists
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/349
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/356
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/357
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/358
by University of Toronto
Part 1: https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/945
In Gaza, after the separation barrier was completed and the Second Intifada had begun, most militants were in fact compelled to turn away from suicide bombing and toward guerilla attacks and the launching of Qassam rockets and mortar shells at Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip and Israel proper.
No such launches were recorded in 2000, but 516 took place in 2001. Their number rose steadily for the next three years to 1,475 in 2004 and then tapered off somewhat to just over 1,000 in 2005 (Intelligence and Information Center 2006, 24; Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2007).
In the West Bank, the situation was different. The rate of killing of Palestinians by Israel was only about half as high as in Gaza. At the same time, the frequency of Palestinian deaths was more sensitive to the threat level than was the case in Gaza. The correlation between the monthly number of Palestinian deaths and the monthly number of suicide missions originating in the region was strong and in the direction that Marshall’s rational choice theory would lead one to expect.
Thus, when threat was high in the West Bank, the killing of Palestinians by the Israeli state rose. When threat was low, the killing of Palestinians dropped off.
Interestingly, frontier-like Gaza was less subject to assassinations than was the West Bank. Nearly twice as many assassinations took place in the West Bank (135) as in Gaza (72).
In addition, a chorus of human rights groups, media outlets, the United Nations, and European governments soon criticized Israeli state violence, calling for constraint and reminding Israel that state violence against civilians violates international human rights norms that have become deeply entrenched since World War II.
About suicide terrorists
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/349
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/356
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/357
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/358
by University of Toronto
Genocide and Suicide Terrorism - Part 1
Article 6 (a) Genocide by killing:
Elements
1. The perpetrator killed2 one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
On 3 April 2002, about 1,000 Israeli troops entered the Jenin refugee camp on the West Bank, home to some 14,000 Palestinians. Supported by Apache attack helicopters and Caterpillar D9 armored bulldozers, the troops razed a section of the camp that harbored militants who had recently organized a string of devastating suicide missions and other attacks against Israeli civilians. At least 52 Palestinians were killed in Jenin, 22 of them civilians, along with 23 Israeli soldiers. By the time the dust settled on 11 April, more than a quarter of the camp’s residents were homeless.
Data were also collected on all 210 state-directed assassinations and 138 suicide bombings that took place in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza between 26 October 2000 (the date of the Second Intifada’s first suicide bombing) and 12 July 2005.
Note that although relatively indiscriminate state violence was more widespread in Gaza than in the West Bank, Israelis saw Gaza as less of a threat than the West Bank throughout the Second Intifada. That is because 109 suicide bombings originated in the West Bank compared to just 28 in Gaza (see Table 3).
Part 2 next post
About suicide terrorists
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/349
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/356
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/357
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/358
by University of Toronto
Article 6 (a) Genocide by killing:
Elements
1. The perpetrator killed2 one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
On 3 April 2002, about 1,000 Israeli troops entered the Jenin refugee camp on the West Bank, home to some 14,000 Palestinians. Supported by Apache attack helicopters and Caterpillar D9 armored bulldozers, the troops razed a section of the camp that harbored militants who had recently organized a string of devastating suicide missions and other attacks against Israeli civilians. At least 52 Palestinians were killed in Jenin, 22 of them civilians, along with 23 Israeli soldiers. By the time the dust settled on 11 April, more than a quarter of the camp’s residents were homeless.
Data were also collected on all 210 state-directed assassinations and 138 suicide bombings that took place in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza between 26 October 2000 (the date of the Second Intifada’s first suicide bombing) and 12 July 2005.
Note that although relatively indiscriminate state violence was more widespread in Gaza than in the West Bank, Israelis saw Gaza as less of a threat than the West Bank throughout the Second Intifada. That is because 109 suicide bombings originated in the West Bank compared to just 28 in Gaza (see Table 3).
Part 2 next post
About suicide terrorists
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/349
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/356
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/357
https://xn--r1a.website/TerrorismTelegram/358
by University of Toronto
Israel, do you know that the "terroristic attack done by humans in Berlin", keeping innocent animals inside a fucking cylinder against their will, still GENERATED MORE DEATHS, compared to what happened at the festivals ... and this is just one of many "terroristic actions done by humans to animals no one is giving a shit.
Even all K deaths animals due to 🛢 disaster, that happened exactly IN ISRAEL TOO!
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/188 or similar things...
Meanwhile, your 1400 is still 1400 since weeks, even yesterday
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelEurope/18636
Just think about that ... since most people simply give a shit to what happens to animals ...
Would be time that ANIMALS GET MORE RESPECT! and not treat like shit and just perfect if you want to eat them ... or useful, once people understand that animals ARE CRUCIAL FOR OUR LIFE!
https://xn--r1a.website/AnimalFreaks/21
It's time to sentence all people doing crimes over crimes to animals or nature, since currently LAWS ARE JUST SHIT! This is not different like doing a terror attack to animals!!!
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/188
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/288
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/55
https://xn--r1a.website/AnimalFreaks/1150
https://xn--r1a.website/EcocideTelegram
This even with Israel oil disaster
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/188
or other Israel crimes against animals
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/191
Yes, people rape animals too!!!
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/598
But at least in Switzerland they "should" get sentenced for porn with animals ...
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/117
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/116
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/115
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/447
Even all K deaths animals due to 🛢 disaster, that happened exactly IN ISRAEL TOO!
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/188 or similar things...
Meanwhile, your 1400 is still 1400 since weeks, even yesterday
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelEurope/18636
Just think about that ... since most people simply give a shit to what happens to animals ...
Would be time that ANIMALS GET MORE RESPECT! and not treat like shit and just perfect if you want to eat them ... or useful, once people understand that animals ARE CRUCIAL FOR OUR LIFE!
https://xn--r1a.website/AnimalFreaks/21
It's time to sentence all people doing crimes over crimes to animals or nature, since currently LAWS ARE JUST SHIT! This is not different like doing a terror attack to animals!!!
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/188
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/288
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/55
https://xn--r1a.website/AnimalFreaks/1150
https://xn--r1a.website/EcocideTelegram
This even with Israel oil disaster
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/188
or other Israel crimes against animals
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelPollution/191
Yes, people rape animals too!!!
https://xn--r1a.website/NatureFreaksDeutsch/598
But at least in Switzerland they "should" get sentenced for porn with animals ...
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/117
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/116
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/115
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/447
Well, journalists are talking just about subscribers and views.
First, they probably haven't read ANYTHING of what we have written in various channels, showing exactly how they are not able to do journalism, if they find just easy big channels showed on Telegram, ignoring all private, hidden, small, etc. channels ...
We already reported to you and to Telegram directly how Telegram is used in inappropriate ways
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/43
This war is nothing better, just think Italy ...
We already reported such spam from Italy multiple times! PS: it's not just Italy ...
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/99
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/121
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/180
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/268
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/143
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/305
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/1465
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/422
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/311
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/142
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/166
etc.
We already said multiple times how people just use Telegram like 💩, with their follow / unfollow after 3 second trend ...
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/127
https://xn--r1a.website/BetterTelegramUsage/30
https://xn--r1a.website/BetterTelegramUsage/6
https://xn--r1a.website/TheBorderlineTelegram/112
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/315
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/287
but they do for other socials too
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/159
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/139
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/174
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/172
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/26
https://xn--r1a.website/TheBorderlineTelegram/106
https://xn--r1a.website/TheBorderlineTelegram/107
https://xn--r1a.website/TheBorderlineTelegram/74
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/148
Conclusion: increase of followers doesn't mean true followers and viewed posts don't mean people really read / watch / click the links!
One thing is sure, our analysis, tests etc. of people behaviour we did during this war confirmed again all such points, means people don't check links, read, watch, search, etc.
Most don't check / read our posts too ...
First, they probably haven't read ANYTHING of what we have written in various channels, showing exactly how they are not able to do journalism, if they find just easy big channels showed on Telegram, ignoring all private, hidden, small, etc. channels ...
We already reported to you and to Telegram directly how Telegram is used in inappropriate ways
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/43
This war is nothing better, just think Italy ...
We already reported such spam from Italy multiple times! PS: it's not just Italy ...
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/99
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/121
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/180
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/268
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/143
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/305
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/1465
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/422
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/311
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/142
https://xn--r1a.website/RapeTelegram/166
etc.
We already said multiple times how people just use Telegram like 💩, with their follow / unfollow after 3 second trend ...
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/127
https://xn--r1a.website/BetterTelegramUsage/30
https://xn--r1a.website/BetterTelegramUsage/6
https://xn--r1a.website/TheBorderlineTelegram/112
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/315
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/287
but they do for other socials too
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/159
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/139
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/174
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/172
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/26
https://xn--r1a.website/TheBorderlineTelegram/106
https://xn--r1a.website/TheBorderlineTelegram/107
https://xn--r1a.website/TheBorderlineTelegram/74
https://xn--r1a.website/TgFreaksAnnouncements/148
Conclusion: increase of followers doesn't mean true followers and viewed posts don't mean people really read / watch / click the links!
One thing is sure, our analysis, tests etc. of people behaviour we did during this war confirmed again all such points, means people don't check links, read, watch, search, etc.
Most don't check / read our posts too ...
Why people don't change mind in front of facts - part 1
Well the fact is THAT BOTH ARE AGGRESSIVE, instead of thinking with the brain.
Means even Israel, just think this example, but there are many more https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/579
It's pretty ridiculous that in 2023 PEOPLE ARE NOT ABLE TO REFLECT ON INFORMATIONS THEY GET OR TO TALK ABOUT ... they need to fight directly. At least Ben did it better in this scene https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/753 but such things are not done by many people
They have their ideas and they continue to keep such ideas, because reflecting and maybe changing mind is to difficult. Obviously this doesn't happen only with the war, but all things. Just think how many people are still using WhatsApp, even if Telegram is offering more and all things are better. Once people fell "this is perfect" it's difficult to put such people away from their idea "this is perfect", even if in reality "this is not perfect" ...
Conclusion (from a research done in 2023): This article (post) may not change your mind
As argued above, decades of research in multiple elds have demonstrated the limited effectiveness of scientific evidence for shifting social norms, creating uptake of new behaviors, or even generating effective solutions.
Most attitudes and behaviors regarding conservation decision-making are not based on the rational evaluation of evidence, but determined instead by a host of contextual, social, and cultural factors and values. Therefore, providing additional information – even in accessible formats - is not likely to lead to significant changes.
Similarly, it is questionable whether an evidence-based article such as this one will serve to change minds, as accepting the claims above may challenge one's prior beliefs about science communication, and perhaps even one's sense of how the world works. Attitudes and beliefs are highly resistant to change, and scientists are as prone as anyone else to “seeing what we believe” (Gorman and Gorman, 2016).
Well the fact is THAT BOTH ARE AGGRESSIVE, instead of thinking with the brain.
Means even Israel, just think this example, but there are many more https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/579
It's pretty ridiculous that in 2023 PEOPLE ARE NOT ABLE TO REFLECT ON INFORMATIONS THEY GET OR TO TALK ABOUT ... they need to fight directly. At least Ben did it better in this scene https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/753 but such things are not done by many people
They have their ideas and they continue to keep such ideas, because reflecting and maybe changing mind is to difficult. Obviously this doesn't happen only with the war, but all things. Just think how many people are still using WhatsApp, even if Telegram is offering more and all things are better. Once people fell "this is perfect" it's difficult to put such people away from their idea "this is perfect", even if in reality "this is not perfect" ...
Conclusion (from a research done in 2023): This article (post) may not change your mind
As argued above, decades of research in multiple elds have demonstrated the limited effectiveness of scientific evidence for shifting social norms, creating uptake of new behaviors, or even generating effective solutions.
Most attitudes and behaviors regarding conservation decision-making are not based on the rational evaluation of evidence, but determined instead by a host of contextual, social, and cultural factors and values. Therefore, providing additional information – even in accessible formats - is not likely to lead to significant changes.
Similarly, it is questionable whether an evidence-based article such as this one will serve to change minds, as accepting the claims above may challenge one's prior beliefs about science communication, and perhaps even one's sense of how the world works. Attitudes and beliefs are highly resistant to change, and scientists are as prone as anyone else to “seeing what we believe” (Gorman and Gorman, 2016).
Why people don't change mind in front of facts - part 2
Part 1: https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/952
The human mind is a social mind, and we live in a community of knowledge in which we depend upon one another to think effectively to support complex and productive action (Sloman and Fernbach, 2018).
The human mind is a social mind that is embedded in social, cultural, and ecological contexts, and as such is wired to act in accordance, rather than in con ict, with social cues and values in one's environ (Schill et al., 2019).
Recent research in social network analysis has found that while novel ideas that are disseminated across large, unstructured networks (e.g. Twitter) may spread more quickly, such information ows rarely result in widespread behavior change (Centola, 2021). Rather, this research suggests that change starts and spreads in the peripheries of societies, where new ideas take hold among smaller social networks by means of strong social ties, which then connect to other social networks, and then eventually they are adopted by the centers (Centola, 2018, 2021).
In this sense, social networks are key both for openness to change as well as resistance to it.
———
Have we said some bullshit? No problem, you can tell us, for example in the comment, and we have no problem to recheck that and in case say "we said bullshit" ... since we don't believe anything, even things said by scientists, and maybe such scientists said bullshit ...
We have not checked every single sources cited, like we did with a nutrition paper
https://xn--r1a.website/GenRevolutionOfficial/182
It's not the scope! Like said, we NEVER visited Israel / Palestine too ...
We have no problem to say that.
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/713
This instead is not be done be most people ... that prefer to defend bullshit, even if they discover it's a bullshit.
Best example? We discovered only after a while this video is bullshit https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelTelegramChannels/10 but we have no problem to say we did an error
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/87
Part 1: https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/952
The human mind is a social mind, and we live in a community of knowledge in which we depend upon one another to think effectively to support complex and productive action (Sloman and Fernbach, 2018).
The human mind is a social mind that is embedded in social, cultural, and ecological contexts, and as such is wired to act in accordance, rather than in con ict, with social cues and values in one's environ (Schill et al., 2019).
Recent research in social network analysis has found that while novel ideas that are disseminated across large, unstructured networks (e.g. Twitter) may spread more quickly, such information ows rarely result in widespread behavior change (Centola, 2021). Rather, this research suggests that change starts and spreads in the peripheries of societies, where new ideas take hold among smaller social networks by means of strong social ties, which then connect to other social networks, and then eventually they are adopted by the centers (Centola, 2018, 2021).
In this sense, social networks are key both for openness to change as well as resistance to it.
———
Have we said some bullshit? No problem, you can tell us, for example in the comment, and we have no problem to recheck that and in case say "we said bullshit" ... since we don't believe anything, even things said by scientists, and maybe such scientists said bullshit ...
We have not checked every single sources cited, like we did with a nutrition paper
https://xn--r1a.website/GenRevolutionOfficial/182
It's not the scope! Like said, we NEVER visited Israel / Palestine too ...
We have no problem to say that.
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/713
This instead is not be done be most people ... that prefer to defend bullshit, even if they discover it's a bullshit.
Best example? We discovered only after a while this video is bullshit https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelTelegramChannels/10 but we have no problem to say we did an error
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/87
We noticed it just now ... This DUDE THAT JUST SHARE BULLSHIT OVER BULLSHIT
Recently https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/929
Previous
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/292
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/293
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/284
and other things ...
Ridiculous how Twitter still keep online accounts that PROMOTE JUST BULLSHIT! Few things should be done a) reduce visibility b) they should NOT get any type of money from any post they post! c) ban, if needed
But you know, when money is more important, so for Elon Musk is better to spread bullshit, so he can continue to get more rich and pollute our planet
Recently https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/929
Previous
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/292
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/293
https://xn--r1a.website/IsraelWarBullshit/284
and other things ...
Ridiculous how Twitter still keep online accounts that PROMOTE JUST BULLSHIT! Few things should be done a) reduce visibility b) they should NOT get any type of money from any post they post! c) ban, if needed
But you know, when money is more important, so for Elon Musk is better to spread bullshit, so he can continue to get more rich and pollute our planet